Literature DB >> 32015742

Improvements in Back and Leg Pain After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.

Dustin H Massel1, Benjamin C Mayo1, Dil V Patel1, Daniel D Bohl1, Philip K Louie1, Gregory D Lopez1, Kern Singh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have quantified clinical improvement following minimally invasive lumbar decompression based on predominant back pain or leg pain.
PURPOSE: To quantify improvement in patient-reported outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression and determine the degree of improvement in back pain, leg pain, and disability in patients who present with predominant back pain or predominant leg pain.
METHODS: Patients who underwent primary, one-level minimally invasive lumbar decompression for degenerative pathology were retrospectively reviewed. Comparisons of visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and Short Form-12 (SF-12) mental and physical component scores from pre-operative to 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with predominant back pain or predominant leg pain.
RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were identified. Scores on VAS back and leg pain, ODI, and SF-12 physical component improved from pre-operative to all post-operative time points. After 1 year, patients reported a 2.8-point (47%) reduction in back pain and a 4-point (61.1%) reduction in leg pain scores; 52 patients with predominant back pain and 50 patients with predominant leg pain reported reductions in pain throughout the year following surgery. In both the back and leg pain cohorts, patients experienced reductions in ODI during the first 6 months and throughout 1-year follow-up, respectively. The majority of patients achieved minimum clinically important difference, regardless of predominant symptom.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients reported improvements in back and leg pain following minimally invasive lumbar decompression regardless of predominant presenting symptom; however, patients with predominant leg pain may experience greater improvement than those with predominant back pain. © Hospital for Special Surgery 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oswestry Disability Index; lumbar decompression; minimally invasive spine surgery; minimum clinically important difference; patient-reported outcomes; visual analog scale back pain; visual analog scale leg pain

Year:  2019        PMID: 32015742      PMCID: PMC6973967          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-018-09661-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  52 in total

1.  The epidemiology of low back pain in an adolescent population.

Authors:  T L Olsen; R L Anderson; S R Dearwater; A M Kriska; J A Cauley; D J Aaron; R E LaPorte
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Perioperative results following open and minimally invasive single-level lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Peter Lee; John C Liu; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 3.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Evaluation of low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for lumbar spinal disease in a multicenter study: differences in scores based on age, sex, and type of disease.

Authors:  Seiji Ohtori; Toshinori Ito; Masaomi Yamashita; Yasuaki Murata; Tatsuo Morinaga; Jiro Hirayama; Tomoaki Kinoshita; Hiromi Ataka; Takana Koshi; Toshihiko Sekikawa; Masayuki Miyagi; Takaaki Tanno; Munetaka Suzuki; Yasuchika Aoki; Takato Aihara; Shinichiro Nakamura; Kiyoshi Yamaguchi; Toshiyuki Tauchi; Kenji Hatakeyama; Keiichi Takata; Hiroaki Sameda; Tomoyuki Ozawa; Eiji Hanaoka; Hirohito Suzuki; Tsutomu Akazawa; Kaoru Suseki; Hajime Arai; Masahiro Kurokawa; Yawara Eguchi; Miyako Suzuki; Yuzuru Okamoto; Jin Miyagi; Masatsune Yamagata; Tomoaki Toyone; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 1.601

5.  The natural history of low back pain in adolescents.

Authors:  A K Burton; R D Clarke; T D McClune; K M Tillotson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Kelly R Bratcher; Chelsea E Canan; Lauren O Burke; Mladen Djurasovic; Steven D Glassman
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-11-16

7.  Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Saniya S Godil; David N Shau; Stephen K Mendenhall; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-11-23

Review 8.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of current concepts in evaluation, management, and outcome measurements.

Authors:  J M Fritz; A Delitto; W C Welch; R E Erhard
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Clinical outcomes after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective case series.

Authors:  Pravesh S Gadjradj; Maurits W van Tulder; Clemens M F Dirven; Wilco C Peul; B Sanjay Harhangi
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 10.  Return-to-Play Recommendations After Cervical, Thoracic, and Lumbar Spine Injuries: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Philip Huang; Alireza Anissipour; William McGee; Lawrence Lemak
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.843

View more
  1 in total

1.  Diabetes is associated with greater leg pain and worse patient-reported outcomes at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Kosei Nagata; Hideki Nakamoto; Masahiko Sumitani; So Kato; Yuichi Yoshida; Naohiro Kawamura; Keiichiro Tozawa; Yujiro Takeshita; Hiroyuki Nakarai; Akiro Higashikawa; Masaaki Iizuka; Takashi Ono; Masayoshi Fukushima; Katsuyuki Sasaki; Rentaro Okazaki; Yusuke Ito; Nobuhiro Hara; Toru Doi; Yuki Taniguchi; Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; Sakae Tanaka; Yasushi Oshima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.