Adwait R Ranade1, Gunda I Georg. 1. University of Kansas , 1251 Wescoe Hall Drive, 4070 Malott Hall, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7482, United States.
Abstract
The synthesis of 3,4-dihydro-1,2-oxazepin-5(2H)-ones and 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones from β-substituted β-hydroxyaminoaldehydes is reported. The β-hydroxyaminoaldehydes were prepared by enantioselective organocatalytic 1,4-addition of N-tert-butyl (tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxycarbamate to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes (MacMillan protocol). Alkyne addition to the aldehydes followed by alcohol oxidation furnished N-Boc O-TBS-protected β-aminoynones. Removal of the TBS protecting group initiated a 7-endo-dig cyclization to yield previously unknown 3,4-dihydro-1,2-oxazepin-5(2H)-ones. Reductive cleavage of the N-O bond of the oxazepinones and Boc-deprotection provided 2-substituted 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones via 6-endo-trig cyclization. 2,3-Dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones are versatile intermediates that have been used for the synthesis of many alkaloids. The new protocol allows the synthesis of 3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones carrying an array of substituents at C2 that cannot be prepared from commercial β-amino acids or by one-carbon homologation of proteinogenic amino acids. The use of readily available β-hydroxylaminoaldehydes expands the utility of our previously reported method to prepare 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones from β-amino acids as the source of diversity and chirality. A broad substrate scope is possible because β-aminoaldehydes can be prepared from α,β-unsaturated aldehydes by an enantioselective organocatalytic process.
The synthesis of 3,4-dihydro-1,2-oxazepin-5(2H)-ones and 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones from β-substituted β-hydroxyaminoaldehydes is reported. The β-hydroxyaminoaldehydes were prepared by enantioselective organocatalytic 1,4-addition of N-tert-butyl (tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxycarbamate to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes (MacMillan protocol). Alkyne addition to the aldehydes followed by alcohol oxidation furnished N-Boc O-TBS-protected β-aminoynones. Removal of the TBS protecting group initiated a 7-endo-dig cyclization to yield previously unknown 3,4-dihydro-1,2-oxazepin-5(2H)-ones. Reductive cleavage of the N-O bond of the oxazepinones and Boc-deprotection provided 2-substituted 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones via 6-endo-trig cyclization. 2,3-Dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones are versatile intermediates that have been used for the synthesis of many alkaloids. The new protocol allows the synthesis of 3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones carrying an array of substituents at C2 that cannot be prepared from commercial β-amino acids or by one-carbon homologation of proteinogenic amino acids. The use of readily available β-hydroxylaminoaldehydes expands the utility of our previously reported method to prepare 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones from β-amino acids as the source of diversity and chirality. A broad substrate scope is possible because β-aminoaldehydes can be prepared from α,β-unsaturated aldehydes by an enantioselective organocatalytic process.
The objective of our
work was to devise an enantioselective synthesis
of 2,6-disubstituted 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones
(Figure 1) that would expand the scope of existing
methods. 2,3-Dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones are versatile
structures that have utility for the synthesis of piperidine-containing
natural products, such as indolizidine and quinolizidine alkaloids,[1,2] and piperidine-containing bioactive molecules.[3−8] They can also be converted to substituted pyridines by oxidation.[9−11] Compared to the structurally closely related enamines, 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones are relatively more stable[12] as a result of the conjugation of the enamine moiety to a carbonyl
functionality (vinylogous amides). They are therefore less sensitive
to hydrolysis and oxidation reactions. The 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones feature multiple reactive groups that can be subjected
to various synthetic transformations that modify the basic scaffold,[13,14] such as N-functionalization,[15,16] C3-functionalization,[17] 1,2-addition at C4, addition of electrophiles
at C5,[18] 1,4-addition at C6, and [2 + 2]
cycloaddition[19] with the C5–C6 double
bond (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Reactivity profile of
2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones.
Reactivity profile of
2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones.Several effective methods exist to prepare 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones enantioselectively (Figure 2).[20] These methods include Comins’
synthesis of 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones, employing
the addition of Grignard reagents to chiral N-acylpyridinium
salts (Figure 2, eq 1).[1,13,21] This approach relies on a sterically demanding
C3 tri-isopropylsilyl (TIPS) group to control regioselectivity and
a carbamate linked chiral auxiliary to achieve excellent diastereoselectivities.
Both auxiliary groups can be removed without racemization of the chiral
center. Charrette’s modification of Comins’ methodology
employs (S)-N-(1-methoxy-3-methylbutan-2-yl)benzamide
to generate nonracemic N-acylpyridinium salts (Figure 2, eq 2)[22] that furnish
N-protected enaminones with excellent diastereo- and regioselectivity.
This system does not require a sterically demanding group at C3 because
the regioselectivity of the reaction is achieved by a chelation-controlled
addition of the Grignard reagent to the pyridinium salt.
Figure 2
Methods for the synthesis
of chiral nonracemic 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones.
A catalytic
enantioselective addition of organozinc reagents to N-acylpyridinium salts was reported by the Feringa group
that furnished enantioselectivities with 56–97% ee with nonbranched
alkylzinc reagents (Figure 2, eq 3).[23]Other approaches utilize the asymmetric
hetero-Diels–Alder
reaction of imines with a Danishefsky’s diene either by using
chiral auxiliaries such as 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-pivaloyl-β-d-galactopyranosylamine (Figure 2, eq
4) attached to the imine[24−28] or by employing a chiral catalyst (Figure 2, eq 5).[29−32] Recently, the Rovis group published a facile highly enantioselective
synthesis of the bicyclic indolizidinone core via Rh(I)·CKphos-catalyzed
cycloaddition of alkynes and 1,1-disubstituted alkenyl isocyanates
(Figure 2, eq 6).[33]Gouault et al. developed a gold-catalyzed enantioselective
synthesis
of 2,6-disubstituted pyridones from the amino-ynones, which were synthesized
from the chiral pool of amino acids (Figure 2, eq 7).[34]Methods for the synthesis
of chiral nonracemic 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones.
Results and Discussion
Although
many methods for the synthesis of chiral nonracemic 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones have proven to be effective, there are drawbacks
depending on the exact method, such as multistep preparation of the
starting material, limited scope for the introduction of substituents
at C2, requirement to remove auxiliary groups, difficult-to-remove
auxiliary groups, or the enantiomer of the chiral auxiliary or chiral
catalyst may not be readily available. A limitation common to most
procedures with the exception of the Rovis method is that they require
multiple subsequent steps if bicyclic enaminones are the target compounds.
In contrast to the above-mentioned approaches, our group developed
a chiral pool method employing readily available chiral nonracemic
β-amino acids as the starting materials (Scheme 1), thereby incorporating asymmetry as well as diversity into
the target compounds.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of Amino Acid-Derived Enaminones[14,35]
This approach not only provides
an enantioselective route to 2-substitited
2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones but also is a concise
and direct route to form bicyclic 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones when cyclic amino acids such as homoproline, homopipecolic
acid, and cis-2-(methylamino)cyclohexanecarboxylic
acid are employed as the starting β-amino acids (Scheme 1).[14,35−42]As shown in Scheme 1, Weinrebamides
of
β-amino acids are reacted with readily available alkynyl Grignard
reagents to form amino ynones. After Boc deprotection with formic
acid and addition of NaI (or using HCl), the ynone is converted to
a ketovinyl halide, which is not isolated. The addition of base to
the reaction mixture deprotonates the amine, which undergoes a 6-endo-trig ring closure to form 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones. Using bicyclic 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones we accomplished the synthesis of indolizidine and quinolizidine
alkaloidsboehmeriasin A,[38] tylocrebrine,[40] antofine,[39,40] and ipalbidine.[39]An advantage of this process is that many
β-amino acids are
commercially available or can be prepared from α-amino acids
by Arndt–Eistert[43] or cyanohydrin
homologation.[44] However, this method relies
largely on the availability of the 20 proteinogenic amino acids and
therefore limits the scope to the side chains to those present in
the naturally occurring amino acids. In the case of the Arndt–Eistert
homologation, the handling of explosive diazomethane reagent is required.[45−47]Many other techniques have been developed to synthesize enantiopure
β-amino acids. Detailed reviews on advances in the synthesis
of β-amino acids and their derivatives have been published by
Sibi[48] and by Juaristi and Soloshonok.[49,50]MacMillan and co-workers recently developed a different strategy
for generating β-amino aldehydes by enantioselective organocatalytic
conjugate addition of N-siloxycarbamate nucleophiles
to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes.[51] This methodology is operationally simple and uses an inexpensive
and commercially available imidazolidinone catalyst that is available
in both enantiomeric forms. A variety of functional groups are tolerated
in this process, and the resulting β-amino aldehydes are synthesized
with high enantiomeric purity. Given the synthetic utility of this
well-developed strategy, we decided to employ it to generate β-hydroxylamino
aldehydes as precursors for synthesizing novel chiral nonracemic 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones.Our planned route to synthesize 2,6-disubstituted2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones 1, is
summarized in Scheme 2. The targeted 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones 1, could be obtained by reductive cleavage
of
the N–O bond of N-hydroxy 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones 2, which would be derived from the
ynones 3, after removal of the Boc- and TBS-protecting
groups. The ynone could be prepared by oxidation of propargyl alcohol 4, obtained by addition of alkynyl nucleophiles to β-hydroxylamino
aldehydes 5. The β-hydroxylamino aldehydes 5 can be prepared using MacMillan’s procedure.[51]
Scheme 2
Retrosynthetic Route to 2,3-Dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones 1
The preparation of the β-hydroxylamino aldehydes 5 started with the synthesis of N-Boc-O-TBS-protectedhydroxylamine 6 and α,β-unsaturated
aldehydes 7 (Scheme 3). We prepared
compound 6 from commercially available N-Boc-hydroxylamine by silylation of the hydroxyl group. Because only
2-hexenal (7a) was commercially available, we prepared
α,β-unsaturated aldehydes 7b and 7c from the corresponding aldehydes and commercially available (triphenylphosphoranylidene)acetaldehyde
by a Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reaction.[52] The β-hydroxylamino aldehydes 5 were
synthesized using the MacMillan protocol (Scheme 3).[51] The spectral data and the
optical rotation of aldehyde 5a matched those reported
by MacMillan. To confirm the optical purity of aldehyde 5b, we converted 5b to (3R,5S)-tert-butyl 3-((1,3-dioxoisoindolin-2-yl)methyl)-5-hydroxyisoxazolidine-2-carboxylate.
The optical rotation of this compound also matched MacMillan’s
report.[51] Aldehyde 5c was
reduced to the corresponding alcohol and then converted to a Mosher
ester.[53] On the basis of the 19FNMR spectrum of its Mosher ester, the enantiomeric ratio was determined
to be 90.5:9.5.
Scheme 3
Synthesis of β-Hydroxylamino Aldehydes 5
For the synthesis
of propargyl alcohols 4 (Table 1), alkynyl nucleophiles were generated by adding n-BuLi to a THF solution of the alkynes at −78 °C.
When R2 was methyl, we used commercially available propynyl
magnesium bromide. The aldehydes 5 were added to the
alkynyl nucleophiles at −78 °C to provide propargyl alcohols 4 (Table 1) as a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers.
Table 1
Synthesis of Propargyl Alcohols 4
entry (compound)
R1
R2
yield (%)
1 (4a)
n-Pr
Ph
64
2 (4b)
n-Pr
4-MeO(C6H4)
33
3 (4c)
n-Pr
4-CF3(C6H4)
83
4 (4d)
n-Pr
thiophen-3-yl
26
5 (4e)
n-Pr
Me
55
6 (4f)
n-Pr
tert-Bu
70
7 (4g)
PhthN–CH2
4-MeO(C6H4)
21
8 (4h)
BnO–CH2
4-MeO(C6H4)
46
After subjecting the diastereomeric propargyl
alcohols 4 to MnO2 oxidation in refluxing
1,2-dichloroethane for
24 h, ynones 3 were obtained and directly used in the
next step (Table 2). In an attempt to simultaneously
remove both amine protecting groups, we treated ynone 3a with 4 NHCl in dioxane followed by basification using excess K2CO3 and methanol. No product was formed, and starting
material 3a decomposed completely. Therefore, we decided
to use an orthogonal strategy to deprotect the TBS group first. When
a TBAF solution (1 M in THF) was slowly added to ynone 3a at room temperature, TLC analysis of the reaction mixture showed
complete disappearance of the starting material and the appearance
of a single new product spot within a few minutes. NMR analysis of
the product revealed that an unusual 7-endo-dig addition
product (i.e., the novel seven-membered oxazepinone 8a) had formed. Subjecting all ynones 3 to the same reaction
conditions furnished oxazepin-5-ones 8a–8h (Table 2).
Table 2
Two-Step
Synthesis of 3,4-Dihydro-1,2-oxazepin-5(2H)-ones 8 from Propargyl Alcohols 4
entry (compound)
R1
R2
yield (%)a
1 (8a)
n-Pr
Ph
77
2 (8b)
n-Pr
4-MeO(C6H4)
91
3 (8c)
n-Pr
4-CF3(C6H4)
23
4 (8d)
n-Pr
thiophen-3-yl
64
5 (8e)
n-Pr
Me
73
6 (8f)
n-Pr
tert-Bu
52
7 (8g)
PhthN–CH2
4-MeO(C6H4)
43
8 (8h)
BnO–CH2
4-MeO(C6H4)
48
Yield over
two steps.
Yield over
two steps.The proposed
mechanism of cyclization is shown in Scheme 4. After the removal of the silyl group, the oxygen
anion attacks the triple bond in Michael fashion, yielding oxazepin-5-ones 8 as a 7-endo-dig-cyclization product.
Scheme 4
Proposed Mechanism of Cyclization
We assigned the identity of the 7-endo-dig products
on the basis of the 1HNMR chemical shifts of the vinylic
protons (Figure 3). For compounds 8, we observed a chemical shift for the vinyl proton at 5.3 ppm for
aliphatic R2 groups and at 5.8–5.9 ppm for aromatic
R2 groups, which is in accordance with shifts reported
in the literature for similar compounds like 6,7-dihydrooxepin-4(5H)-ones (5.3–5.8 ppm),[54,55] 5-substituted
furanones (5.3 ppm),[56] and 2-substituted
dihydropyranones (5.3 ppm).[56−58] This also ruled out the possibility
that 6-exo-trig products had formed, in which case
the 1HNMR chemical shifts for the vinyl protons would
be expected at 6.7 ppm.[59]
Figure 3
Chemical shifts of vinylic
protons (5.3–5.9 ppm) for compounds 8 in comparison
with 3a,4-dihydrooxepinone 9 (5.2
ppm),[54] 4-oxo-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran 10 (5.3 ppm),[58] and
(Z)-2-benzylidene-4-methyldihydro-2H-pyran-3(4H)-one 11 (6.7 ppm).[59]
Chemical shifts of vinylic
protons (5.3–5.9 ppm) for compounds 8 in comparison
with 3a,4-dihydrooxepinone 9 (5.2
ppm),[54] 4-oxo-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran 10 (5.3 ppm),[58] and
(Z)-2-benzylidene-4-methyldihydro-2H-pyran-3(4H)-one 11 (6.7 ppm).[59]A literature search indicated that this particular seven-membered
scaffold has not been reported before, although 1,2-oxazepines are
a known class of compounds.[60] Various methods
have been reported for the synthesis of the 1,2-oxazepine core. These
include pyrolysis of cyclic N-oxides,[60−62] double Michael-type
addition of hydroxylamine to heptadienone,[63] intramolecular N-alkylation of a hydroxylamine derivative,[64] intramolecular O-alkylation,[65] ring-closing metathesis of alkenes tethered by hydroxylamine,[66] Pd-catalyzed [4 + 3] cycloaddition of γ-methylidene-δ-valerolactones
with nitrones,[67] ring enlargement of bicyclic
dibromo-1,2-oxazines,[68] gold(I)-catalyzed
1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of alkynyl cyclopropyl oximes with nitrones,[69] and cyclocondensation of chalcone-based 1,5-diketones
and hydroxylamine.[70] In all of these reports,
the structures of the final 1,2-oxazepine derivatives obtained are
different from 1,2-oxazepinones 8. For example, some
of the above-mentioned examples of oxazepines are fused with heterocycles
or a benzene ring, do not possess unsaturation in the ring, and, many
of those compounds, are devoid of a ketone moiety in their structures.
Scaffold 8 contains an α,β-unsaturated ketone
within the ring system that is bonded to oxygen at the β-position,
thus featuring also an enolether moiety.Following MacMillan’s
precedence that the N–O bond
can be cleaved easily with SmI2, we subjected oxazepinones 8 to reduction with SmI2 followed by treatment
with TFA to remove the Boc group and isolated the 2,3-dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones 1 (Table 3)
as the reaction products.
Table 3
Synthesis of 2,3-Dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones 1
entry (compound)
R1
R2
yield (%)
1 (1a)
n-Pr
Ph
60
2 (1b)
n-Pr
4-CF3(C6H4)
78
3 (1c)
n-Pr
thiophen-3-yl
88
4 (1d)
n-Pr
Me
100
5 (1e)
n-Pr
tert-Bu
100
6 (1f)
BnO–CH2
4-MeO(C6H4)
75
Conclusions
We have extended the scope of our previously reported method for
the synthesis of 3,4-dihydro-1,2-oxazepin-5(2H)-ones 1 by utilizing aminoaldehydes 5 instead of β-amino
acids as starting materials. The advantage of this method is that
a wide variety aminoaldehydes 5 with different substituents
can be prepared from α,β-unsaturated aldehydes employing
MacMillan’s enantioselective organocatalytic method. The α,β-unsaturated
aldehydes are readily accessible by reacting aldehydes with (triphenyphosphoranylidene)acetaldehyde.
Another result from this research is the identification of 3,4-dihydro-1,2-oxazepin-5(2H)-ones 8 that represent a novel structural
type. The one-flask reductive cleavage of the N–O bonds of
these intermediates followed by Boc-deprotection furnished the targeted
2,3-dihydropyridin-4-(1H)-ones 1. The
2,3-dihydropyridin-4-(1H)-ones 1, and
oxazepinones 8, constitute unique six- and seven-membered
scaffolds that can be used for the synthesis of diverse compound libraries.
Additional chemical transformations can be carried out (Figure 1) to diversify these scaffolds further.
Experimental Section
All commercially available reagents
and solvents were used without
further purification. Flash column chromatography was carried out
on silica gel. TLC was conducted on silica gel 250 μm, F254
plates. 1HNMR spectra were recorded at 400 MHz on a NMR
instrument. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm with TMS as an internal
standard (TMS, 0.0 ppm). Data are reported as follows: chemical shift,
multiplicity (s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; br,
broad; and m, multiplet), integration, and coupling constants (Hz). 13CNMR spectra were recorded at 100 MHz with complete proton
decoupling. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm with the solvent as
internal standard (CDCl3, 77.2 ppm). High-resolution mass
spectrometry was carried out using ESI-TOF. IR spectra were recorded
on a FT-IR spectrometer and are reported in terms of frequency of
absorption (cm–1). Optical rotations were measured
on a polarimeter at a concentration (c) of grams
per 100 mL.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of α,β-Unsaturated
Aldehydes 7
(E)-Hex-2-enal
(7a). This compound is commercially available.
General
Procedure for the Synthesis of α,β-Unsaturated
Aldehydes 7b and 7c.[52]
A toluene solution (0.13 M) of (triphenylphosphoranylidene)acetaldehyde
(1.0 equiv) and appropriate starting aldehyde (1.0 equiv) was heated
under reflux for 4 to 5 h under an argon atmosphere. After the solvent
was evaporated in vacuo, the residue was purified by silica gel chromatography.
Purification
of the crude reaction product by silica gel column chromatography
(30% EtOAc/hexanes) provided the title compound as clear oil in 81%
yield (1.8 g). IR (thin film) 1772, 1703, 1679, 1466, 733 cm–1. 1HNMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.57 (dd,
2H, J1 = 1.7 and J2 = 5 Hz), 6.12–6.18 (ddt, 1H, J1 = 1.7, J2 = 7.6 and J3 = 15.8 Hz), 6.83 (dt, 1H, J1 = 5 and J2 = 15.8 Hz), 7.77 (dd, 2H, J1 = 3 and J2 = 5.5
Hz), 7.90 (dd, 2H, J1 = 3 and J2 = 5.5 Hz), 9.57 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz) ppm. 13CNMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ
38.4, 123.7, 131.8, 133.1, 134.4, 149.0, 167.5, 192.5 ppm. HRMS m/z [M + Na] calcd for C12H9NNaO3, 238.0480; found, 238.0484.
(E)-4-(Benzyloxy)but-2-enal (7c)
Purification
of the crude reaction product by silica gel
column chromatography (20% EtOAc/hexanes) provided the title compound
as clear oil in 85% yield (2.0 g). The spectral data of the title
compound was in agreement with that found in the literature.[71]
Synthesis of tert-Butyl (tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxycarbamate
(6)
To a round-bottomed flask was added N-Boc hydroxylamine
(1.0 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (0.2 M) and triethylamine
(1.1 equiv), and the flask was cooled to 0 °C. To this solution
was added TBSCl (1.0 equiv) as liquid, and the reaction mixture was
allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for an additional
12 h. Upon completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was poured
into a separatory funnel and washed with water and brine. The organic
layer was separated, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated
in vacuo. The resulting residue was purified by silica gel chromatography
(10% ether/hexanes) to provide the title compound as a low-melting
solid in 95% yield (0.88 g). The spectral data of compound 6 matched with that described in the literature.[51]
General Procedure for the Synthesis β-Hydroxylaminoaldehydes
(5).[51]
A round-bottomed
flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer bar was charged with the pTSA salt of (2R,5R)-5-benzyl-2-tert-butyl-3-methylimidazolidin-4-one (0.2 equiv) and the
appropriate α,β-unsaturated aldehyde (7)
(3.0 equiv) in CHCl3 (1.0 M for 7) and was
then cooled to −20 °C. tert-Butyl (tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)carbamate 6 (1.0
equiv) was added in one portion as a solid, and the reaction was maintained
at −20 °C for 24–36 h. After completion of the
reaction, the reaction mixture was filtered through a silica gel plug,
eluted with diethyl ether, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue
was purified by silica gel chromatography. The spectral data for new
compounds 5b and 5c is given below.
Purification by silica gel column chromatography
(20% Et2O/hexanes) provided the title compound as clear
oil in 68% yield (583 mg). IR (thin film) 3430, 2945, 2930, 2858,
1728, 1479, 1455, 1388, 1368, 1310, 1251, 1168, 1109, 841, 786, 698
cm–1. 1HNMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.14 (d, 6H, J = 1.7 Hz), 0.94 (s, 9H),
1.46 (s, 9H), 2.59 (ddd, 1H, J1 = 2.1, J2 = 7.3, and J3 =
16.5 Hz), 2.76 (ddd, 1H, J1 = 2.1, J2 = 7.3, and J3 =
16.5 Hz), 3.50 (dd, 1H, J1 = 7.2 and J2 = 9.4 Hz), 3.73 (dd, 1H, J1 = 6.7 Hz and J2 = 9.4 Hz),
4.52 (s, 2H), 4.59–4.65 (m, 1H), 7.32–7.35 (m, 5H),
9.75 (t, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz). 13CNMR (100
MHz, CDCl3) δ −4.4, 18.1, 26.0, 28.1, 43.8,
57.8, 69.5, 73.1, 82.0, 127.6, 128.5, 131.8, 137.9, 158.6, 199.9.
HRMS m/z [M + Na] calcd for C22H37NNaO5Si, 446.2339; found, 446.2343.
[α]D25 +1.80 (c 0.500, CHCl3). The enantiomeric
ratio was determined by converting the title compound into the corresponding
alcohol. For synthesizing the alcohol, the title compound was dissolved
in MeOH (2.5 M) and cooled to 0 °C. To this was added NaBH4 (4.0 equiv). After stirring for 1 h, the reaction mixture
was quenched with 1.0 M NaHSO4(aq) and then the extracted
with diethyl ether (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layer was
dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo.
The crude alcohol was then converted into the Mosher ester by reaction
with (S)-(+)-α-methoxy-α-(trifluoromethyl)phenylacetyl
chloride (MTPA-Cl). The ratio of the two resulting diastereomeric
compounds was determined to be 90.5:9.5 by 19FNMR. 19FNMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ −71.54 (major
peak), −72.12 (minor peak).
General Procedure for the
Synthesis of Propargyl Alcohols 4a–d and 4f–h
The alkyne (1.5
equiv) was dissolved in dry THF
(2.0 M) and cooled to −78 °C. A solution of n-butyllithium (2.5 M in hexanes, 1.3 equiv) was then added dropwise.
The mixture was stirred for 30 min at −78 °C, and then
the β-hydroxylamino aldehyde (5a–c, 1.0 equiv) was added slowly. The mixture was stirred for 4 to 5
h. When the reaction was complete, as indicated by TLC, the mixture
was quenched by adding an aqueous saturated solution of ammonium chloride.
The aqueous layer was separated and extracted three times with ethyl
ether. The organic layers were combined, washed with water and then
with brine, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and
concentrated in vacuo.
To a solution of 5a (1.00 equiv) in dry THF (0.05
M) at −78 °C under argon was slowly added 1-propynyl magnesium
bromide (0.500 M in tetrahydrofuran, 4.00 equiv). The reaction mixture
was stirred at −78 °C and monitored by TLC. After 4 to
5 h, when the reaction was complete as indicated by TLC, the mixture
was quenched by adding an aqueous saturated solution of ammonium chloride.
The mixture was diluted with ethyl ether and washed with brine. The
separated organic layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered,
and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the resulting residue by
silica gel column chromatography (20% Et2O/hexanes) provided
the title compound as yellow oil in 55% yield (317 mg). IR (thin film)
3212, 2961, 2933, 1709, 1384, 1364, 1142 cm–1. 1HNMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.14–0.15
(m, 6H), 0.87–0.90 (m, 3H), 0.90–0.92 (d, 9H, J = 8 Hz), 1.34–1.40 (m, 3H), 1.44 (s, 9H), 1.69–1.72
(m, 2H), 1.79 (s, 3H), 2.01–2.17 (m, 1H), 3.86–4.00
(br m, 1H), 4.34–4.42 (m, 1H). 13CNMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3) δ −4.5, 3.6, 13.9, 18.1, 19.8, 26.1,
28.3, 35.6, 40.9, 59.8, 61.1, 80.0, 80.5, 81.8, 158.3. HRMS m/z [M + Na] calcd for C20H39NNaO4Si, 408.2546; found, 408.2556.
General Procedure for the
Synthesis of Ynones 3a–h
The propargyl alcohol (4a–h, 1.0
equiv) was dissolved in 1,2-dichloroethane
(0.035 M), and activated MnO2 (30 equiv) was added. The
reaction mixture was refluxed overnight. After completion of the reaction,
as indicated by TLC, the reaction mixture was filtered through a pad
of Celite. The solution was concentrated in vacuo to give the title
compound as a crude oil. The crude product was used in the next step
assuming quantitative yield because complete conversion was observed.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Oxazepin-5-ones 8a–h
The ynone (3a–h, 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in THF (0.028 M),
and tetrabutylammonium fluoride (1.0 M in tetrahydrofuran, 2.5 equiv)
was added at room temperature. After stirring for 1 min, the reaction
was complete, as indicated by TLC. The reaction mixture was quenched
with silica gel and concentrated in vacuo. The yields shown below
refer to the two-step conversion of propargyl alcohols 4 to oxazepin-5-ones 8.
General Procedure
for the Synthesis of 2,3-Dihydropyridin-4(1H)-ones 1a–f
To
an oven-dried 10 mL round-bottomed flask charged with corresponding
oxazepin-5-one 1 (1.00 equiv) in degassed MeOH (1 mL)
was added SmI2 (0.100 M in tetrahydrofuran, 3.00 equiv)
under an argon atmosphere. The deep-blue solution was allowed to stir
at room temperature until the reaction turned pale yellow (2 min)
or was deemed complete by TLC. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and
the residue was then resuspended in dichloromethane (20 mL). The organic
layer was washed successively with aqueous 1 M NaHSO4,
H2O, and brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated
in vacuo to give crude compound. To a solution of this crude compound
in dichloromethane (1 mL) was added trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The
reaction mixture was stirred until TLC showed that the reaction was
complete (∼24 h). The reaction mixture was then diluted with
DCM (20 mL) and washed with saturated NaHCO3 solution,
and brine. The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered,
and concentrated to afford the pure title compound.
Authors: Cory A Newman; Jon C Antilla; Pei Chen; Alexander V Predeus; Lee Fielding; William D Wulff Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2007-05-16 Impact factor: 15.419