Literature DB >> 24248341

Effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the risk perception of residents near a nuclear power plant in China.

Lei Huang1, Ying Zhou, Yuting Han, James K Hammitt, Jun Bi, Yang Liu.   

Abstract

We assessed the influence of the Fukushima nuclear accident (FNA) on the Chinese public's attitude and acceptance of nuclear power plants in China. Two surveys (before and after the FNA) were administered to separate subsamples of residents near the Tianwan nuclear power plant in Lianyungang, China. A structural equation model was constructed to describe the public acceptance of nuclear power and four risk perception factors: knowledge, perceived risk, benefit, and trust. Regression analysis was conducted to estimate the relationship between acceptance of nuclear power and the risk perception factors while controlling for demographic variables. Meanwhile, we assessed the median public acceptable frequencies for three levels of nuclear events. The FNA had a significant impact on risk perception of the Chinese public, especially on the factor of perceived risk, which increased from limited risk to great risk. Public acceptance of nuclear power decreased significantly after the FNA. The most sensitive groups include females, those not in public service, those with lower income, and those living close to the Tianwan nuclear power plant. Fifty percent of the survey respondents considered it acceptable to have a nuclear anomaly no more than once in 50 y. For nuclear incidents and serious incidents, the frequencies are once in 100 y and 150 y, respectively. The change in risk perception and acceptance may be attributed to the FNA. Decreased acceptance of nuclear power after the FNA among the Chinese public creates additional obstacles to further development of nuclear power in China and require effective communication strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nuclear risk; public perception; spatial distribution

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24248341      PMCID: PMC3856800          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1313825110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

1.  Public response to the Tokai nuclear accident.

Authors:  T Katsuya
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage.

Authors:  S N Jonkman; P H A J M van Gelder; J K Vrijling
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Examining the relationship between affect and implicit associations: implications for risk perception.

Authors:  Simone Dohle; Carmen Keller; Michael Siegrist
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Nuclear power. Is the friendly atom poised for a comeback?

Authors:  Eliot Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Consumer evaluations of food risk management quality in Europe.

Authors:  E Van Kleef; J R Houghton; A Krystallis; U Pfenning; G Rowe; H Van Dijk; I A Van der Lans; L J Frewer
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Perceived risks from radiation and nuclear testing near Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan: a comparison between physicians, scientists, and the public.

Authors:  Kathleen L Purvis-Roberts; Cynthia A Werner; Irene Frank
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Living with nuclear power: A Q-method study of local community perceptions.

Authors:  Dan Venables; Nick Pidgeon; Peter Simmons; Karen Henwood; Karen Parkhill
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  Effects of distance, age and sex upon attitudes toward nuclear power plants: an empirical study.

Authors:  M Hüppe; J Weber
Journal:  Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed       Date:  1999-08

9.  How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster.

Authors:  Vivianne H M Visschers; Michael Siegrist
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.000

10.  Risk perception in a developing country: the case of Chile.

Authors:  Nicolás C Bronfman; Luis A Cifuentes
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.000

View more
  14 in total

1.  The amplification of risk in experimental diffusion chains.

Authors:  Mehdi Moussaïd; Henry Brighton; Wolfgang Gaissmaier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Maternal residential proximity to nuclear facilities and low birth weight in offspring in Texas.

Authors:  Xi Gong; F Benjamin Zhan; Yan Lin
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Assessing knowledge and application of emergency risk communication principles among public health workers in China.

Authors:  James R Cope; Melinda Frost; Li Richun; Ruiqian Xie
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 1.385

4.  Integrating new indicators of predictors that shape the public's perception of local extreme temperature in China.

Authors:  Jie Ban; Lei Huang; Chen Chen; Yuming Guo; Mike Z He; Tiantian Li
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Development and evaluation of a new measure of children's play: the Children's Play Scale (CPS).

Authors:  Helen F Dodd; Rachel J Nesbit; Laura R Maratchi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Bipolarization of Risk Perception about the Health Effects of Radiation in Residents after the Accident at Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant.

Authors:  Makiko Orita; Naomi Hayashida; Yumi Nakayama; Tetsuko Shinkawa; Hideko Urata; Yoshiko Fukushima; Yuuko Endo; Shunichi Yamashita; Noboru Takamura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Acceptable Risk Analysis for Abrupt Environmental Pollution Accidents in Zhangjiakou City, China.

Authors:  Xi Du; Zhijiao Zhang; Lei Dong; Jing Liu; Alistair G L Borthwick; Renzhi Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Do Climate Change Policies Promote or Conflict with Subjective Wellbeing: A Case Study of Suzhou, China.

Authors:  Miaomiao Liu; Yining Huang; Rosemary Hiscock; Qin Li; Jun Bi; Patrick L Kinney; Clive E Sabel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Exploring the Determinants of Perceived Risk of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in Korea.

Authors:  Sunhee Kim; Seoyong Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The Influencing Factors of Haze Tolerance in China.

Authors:  Lingyi Zhou; Yixin Dai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.