Literature DB >> 24784460

Systolic flow displacement correlates with future ascending aortic growth in patients with bicuspid aortic valves undergoing magnetic resonance surveillance.

Nicholas S Burris1, Monica Sigovan, Heather A Knauer, Elaine E Tseng, David Saloner, Michael D Hope.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Altered systolic blood flow in the ascending aorta has been correlated with increased aortic growth in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs). We used conventional, 2-dimensional (2D) phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) to assess the relationship between altered flow and future growth in patients with BAV.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aortic MRI data were reviewed for 17 adult patients with BAV with right-left leaflet fusion undergoing surveillance imaging who had 2D PC-MRI through their ascending aortas on an initial study, follow-up studies more than 1 year later, and an initial maximum aortic diameter of less than 4.5 cm. Diameters were measured at standard levels by 2 blinded reviewers. Normalized systolic flow displacement was calculated at peak systole from the PC-MRI data, and correlation with the interval aortic growth was performed, with adjustment for clinical/demographic factors.
RESULTS: The average follow-up interval was 2.9 ± 1.3 years. Systolic flow displacement at the initial study strongly correlated with ascending aortic growth rate (r = 0.71, P < 0.005) with moderate, non-significant correlation between initial diameter and growth (r = 0.45, P = 0.214). Aortic growth was 4 times faster in patients with initial flow displacement of 0.2 or greater (n = 9) compared with those (n = 8) with initial flow displacement less than 0.2 (0.8 ± 0.4 vs 0.2 ± 0.3 mm/y; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Systolic flow displacement calculated from conventional 2D PC-MRI in the ascending aorta correlates with future aortic growth in patients undergoing routine surveillance imaging for BAV. With a cutoff valve of 0.2, flow displacement may be used to identify a subset of patients likely to have elevated growth rates and may better risk-stratify patients with BAV for aortic disease progression than vessel diameter alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24784460     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  16 in total

1.  Association between flow skewness and aortic dilatation in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Hojin Ha; Hyun Jung Koo; June Goo Lee; Guk Bae Kim; Jihoon Kweon; Sang Joon Lee; Joon Won Kang; Tae Hwan Lim; Dae Hee Kim; Jong Min Song; Duk Hyun Kang; Jae Kwan Song; Young Hak Kim; Namkug Kim; Dong Hyun Yang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Evolving treatment options for valve and aortic disease with bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Nicholas S Burris; Michael D Hope
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-08

3.  Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm wall stress analysis using patient-specific finite element modeling of in vivo magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kapil Krishnan; Liang Ge; Henrik Haraldsson; Michael D Hope; David A Saloner; Julius M Guccione; Elaine E Tseng
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-07-14

4.  MRI-based Protocol to Characterize the Relationship Between Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology and Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Lucia Mirabella; Alex J Barker; Neelakantan Saikrishnan; Elizabeth R Coco; Daniel J Mangiameli; Michael Markl; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Valve mediated hemodynamics and their association with distal ascending aortic diameter in bicuspid aortic valve subjects.

Authors:  Vrishank Raghav; Alex J Barker; Daniel Mangiameli; Lucia Mirabella; Michael Markl; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Bicuspid valve-related aortic disease: flow assessment with conventional phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Nicholas S Burris; Michael D Hope
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: Full online-only version.

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Paul W M Fedak; Elizabeth H Stephens; Thomas G Gleason; Evaldas Girdauskas; John S Ikonomidis; Ali Khoynezhad; Samuel C Siu; Subodh Verma; Michael D Hope; Duke E Cameron; Donald F Hammer; Joseph S Coselli; Marc R Moon; Thoralf M Sundt; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Alessandro Della Corte; Hector I Michelena; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Optimized analysis of blood flow and wall shear stress in the common carotid artery of rat model by phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Shin-Lei Peng; Cheng-Ting Shih; Chiun-Wei Huang; Shao-Chieh Chiu; Wu-Chung Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Bileaflet mechanical aortic valves do not alter ascending aortic wall shear stress.

Authors:  Emile S Farag; Emilio L Schade; Pim van Ooij; S Matthijs Boekholdt; R Nils Planken; Roland van Kimmenade; Aart J Nederveen; Bas A J M de Mol; Jolanda Kluin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Model-Based Therapy Planning Allows Prediction of Haemodynamic Outcome after Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  M Kelm; L Goubergrits; J Bruening; P Yevtushenko; J F Fernandes; S H Sündermann; F Berger; V Falk; T Kuehne; S Nordmeyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.