Literature DB >> 24783468

Non-invasive cardiac output assessment in critically ill paediatric patients.

Theeranan Wongsirimetheekul, Anant Khositseth, Rojjanee Lertbunrian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recently, non-invasive methods for cardiac output (CO) assessment have been developed including the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM). This technique uses the same concept as Doppler echocardiography but differs in two aspects including continuous wave (CW) Doppler and estimated outflow tract diameter (OTD) used in USCOM compared to pulsed wave Doppler and directed measurement of OTD used in echocardiography. We sought to assess the agreement between CO assessment by USCOM and echocardiography in critically ill paediatric patients.
METHODS: Paired measurements of CO in critically ill paediatric patients were simultaneously and independently obtained by USCOM and echocardiography. Agreement between OTD, velocity time integral (VTI), CO, and cardiac index (CI) were assessed by percentage error and Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS: Thirty-four children (aged 7.86 +/- 5.78years, 44.1% male) had a mean OTD (1.47 +/- 0.38, 1.41 +/- 0.40), VTI (19.13 +/- 6.06, 23.53 +/- 7.31 cm), CO (3.88 +/- 2.19,4.41 +/- 2.83 l/min) and CI (4.23 +/- 1.19,4.77 +/- 1.43 l/min/m2) by echocardiography and USCOM, respectively. Bias +/- precision and percentage of error of OTD, VTI, CO, and CI were -0.07 +/- 0.20 cm, 27.80%; -4.40 +/- 3.84 cm, 31.99%; -0.53 +/- 1.23 l/min, 54.66%; and 0.54 +/- 1.03 l/min/m2, 42.32%, respectively. The bias +/- precision and percentage error were more important in patients with septic shock (n = 16).
CONCLUSION: USCOM was an unreliable tool for absolute value measurement of CO and CI due to the errors of VTI by CW Doppler.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24783468     DOI: 10.1080/ac.69.2.3017298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cardiol        ISSN: 0001-5385            Impact factor:   1.718


  4 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy and precision of minimally-invasive cardiac output monitoring in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro; Alexandre Joosten; Linda Suk-Ling Murphy; Olivier Desebbe; Brenton Alexander; Sang-Hyun Kim; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Validation of an Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor as a Bedside Tool for Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Fernando Beltramo; Jondavid Menteer; Asma Razavi; Robinder G Khemani; Jacqueline Szmuszkovicz; Christopher J L Newth; Patrick A Ross
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  [Application of ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in evaluation of cardiac function in children with severe pneumonia].

Authors:  Juan Fan; Zhi-Ying Chen; Peng-Yuan Chen; Chang-Hui Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2016-09

4.  Comparison of three non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring methods in critically ill children.

Authors:  Chanapai Chaiyakulsil; Marut Chantra; Poomiporn Katanyuwong; Anant Khositseth; Nattachai Anantasit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.