Literature DB >> 24781020

Feconomics®; a new and more convenient method, the routine diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections.

Ismail Soner Koltas1, Isın Akyar, Gullu Elgun, Tanıl Kocagoz.   

Abstract

Direct wet mount examination and concentration are the most commonly used methods for detecting intestinal parasites from fecal samples. Concentration methods are used when there are fewer protozoan cyst, coccidian oocyst, microsporidial spore, helminth egg, and larvae in the fecal samples. Early detection of the causative intestinal parasites plays a significant role in implementing timely and correct treatment, which relieves the patients' symptoms and also prevents recurrences. Formalin-ethyl acetate concentration (FEAC) is believed to be a gold standard method to detect most intestinal parasites. Thus, in this study, we evaluated the diagnostic value of Feconomics® [manufactured by Salubris Inc, Boston, USA. Patent application number (TR): 2010/07549] which is a simple, new, and rapid fecal concentration method for the detection of the intestinal parasites in human beings. We also compared the FEAC with Feconomics® and direct wet mount examination. A total of 918 fecal samples were collected from the patients suspected to have intestinal parasitic infection. Samples were examined with the direct wet mount, FEAC, and Feconomics® methods. Different parasite species 15.9% (146/918) with Feconomics®, 13.3% (122/918) with FEAC, and 9.8% (90/918) with direct wet mount examination, Feconomics® > FEAC > direct wet mount examinations were detected. They were statistically compared considering FEAC as the gold standard for parasitological diagnosis; the sensitivity and specificity of Feconomics® were calculated as 96 and 97%, respectively. Blastocystis hominis was found to be the most common parasite, followed by Giardia lamblia with direct wet mount examination, FEAC, and Feconomics® methods. Feconomics® proved to be better than not only FEAC in concentrating parasite egg and cyst forms as well as in maintaining characteristic morphology but it is also better in direct wet mount examination. Feconomics® eliminates the need for centrifugation by using absorbent beads that help the homogenization and concentration of the sample. Feconomics® in this study was considerably better than FEAC in detecting the trophozoites of Giardia lamblia. We suggest that Feconomics® be used for the routine diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infection in rural areas of developing countries due to the fact that a centrifuge is not required and it eliminates large stool particles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24781020     DOI: 10.1007/s00436-014-3899-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.289


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of three concentration methods for the recovery of canine intestinal parasites from stool samples.

Authors:  S Katagiri; T C G Oliveira-Sequeira
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.011

2.  [The comparison of the concentration techniques used in investigation of feces for parasitosis].

Authors:  Nilay Cöplü; Ayşegül Gözalan; Levent Akin
Journal:  Turkiye Parazitol Derg       Date:  2007

3.  Parasite detection efficiencies of five stool concentration systems.

Authors:  J L Perry; J S Matthews; G R Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Laboratory diagnosis of intestinal parasitosis.

Authors:  S Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Concentration and identification of Cryptosporidium sp. by use of a parasite concentrator.

Authors:  W S Zierdt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  [Usefulness of 2 coproparasitological methods and their utilization in an antigiardiasis therapeutic trial].

Authors:  Daimary Mendoza; Fidel Angel Núñez; Angel Arturo Escobedo; Liliana Pelayo; Maribel Fernández; Dinorah Torres; Raúl A Cordovi
Journal:  Rev Cubana Med Trop       Date:  2003 Sep-Dec

7.  Parasitic infections of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  James A Harp
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.287

8.  A field evaluation of formalin-gasoline technique in the concentration of stool for detection of intestinal parasites.

Authors:  Nayeb Ali Ahmadi; Fatemeh-alsadat Damraj
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 2.289

9.  Evaluation of the formalin-tween concentration technique for parasitic detection.

Authors:  Rungkanta Methanitikorn; Kom Sukontason; Kabkaew L Sukontason; Somsak Piangjai
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 1.846

10.  Comparison of the FeKal CON-Trate system with the formalin-ethyl acetate technique for detection of intestinal parasites.

Authors:  E G Long; A T Tsin; B A Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  3 in total

1.  Improvement in the detection of enteric protozoa from clinical stool samples using the automated urine sediment analyzer sediMAX® 2 compared to sediMAX® 1.

Authors:  J Intra; M R Sala; R Falbo; F Cappellini; P Brambilla
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  A historical review of the techniques of recovery of parasites for their detection in human stools.

Authors:  Felipe Augusto Soares; Aline do Nascimento Benitez; Bianca Martins Dos Santos; Saulo Hudson Nery Loiola; Stefany Laryssa Rosa; Walter Bertequini Nagata; Sandra Valéria Inácio; Celso Tetsuo Nagase Suzuki; Katia Denise Saraiva Bresciani; Alexandre Xavier Falcão; Jancarlo Ferreira Gomes
Journal:  Rev Soc Bras Med Trop       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 1.581

3.  Complementary school garden, nutrition, water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to improve children's nutrition and health status in Burkina Faso and Nepal: a study protocol.

Authors:  Séverine Erismann; Akina Shrestha; Serge Diagbouga; Astrid Knoblauch; Jana Gerold; Ramona Herz; Subodh Sharma; Christian Schindler; Peter Odermatt; Axel Drescher; Ray-Yu Yang; Jürg Utzinger; Guéladio Cissé
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.