Literature DB >> 27646557

Improvement in the detection of enteric protozoa from clinical stool samples using the automated urine sediment analyzer sediMAX® 2 compared to sediMAX® 1.

J Intra1, M R Sala2, R Falbo2, F Cappellini2, P Brambilla2.   

Abstract

Detection of intestinal parasites from fecal samples is routinely performed by direct wet mount examination. This method requires skilled personnel, and it is time consuming. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the usefulness of the newer automated urinary sediment analyser sediMAX 2 for a fast detection of intestinal protozoa in stool samples. A total of 700 consecutively preserved samples consisting of 70 positives and 630 negatives were analyzed. SediMAX 2 takes digital images of each sediment sample, and analysis was conducted using a dilution of stool specimens, allowing determination of typical morphology. Compared to manual microscopy, sediMAX 2 showed sensitivity and specificity of 100 % in the detection of intestinal parasites, as also recently demonstrated for sediMAX 1. However, all clinically important human protozoa were detected using only 15 images for each specimen, compared to 30 images required in sediMAX 1 analysis. Moreover, changing manually the focus, it is possible to carry out a discrimination between morphologically identical Entamoeba complex members, including the pathogenic E. histolytica and the non-pathogenic E. dispar, E. moshkovskii and E. Bangladeshi, from the non-pathogenic Entamoeba coli based on the number of nuclei present in the cells. This study presents sediMAX 2 as an automatic aid to traditional microscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27646557     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-016-2788-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  25 in total

1.  Comparison of eight computer programs for receiver-operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Sebastian Wesseling; Tania Schink; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Detection of intestinal parasites by use of the cuvette-based automated microscopy analyser sediMAX(®).

Authors:  J Intra; E Taverna; M R Sala; R Falbo; F Cappellini; P Brambilla
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Evaluation of multiplex tandem real-time PCR for detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in clinical stool samples.

Authors:  D Stark; S E Al-Qassab; J L N Barratt; K Stanley; T Roberts; D Marriott; J Harkness; J T Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Recent advances in clinical parasitology diagnostics.

Authors:  Cedric P Yansouni; Joanna Merckx; Michael D Libman; Momar Ndao
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  Evaluation of nine immunoassay kits (enzyme immunoassay and direct fluorescence) for detection of Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum in human fecal specimens.

Authors:  L S Garcia; R Y Shimizu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Feconomics®; a new and more convenient method, the routine diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections.

Authors:  Ismail Soner Koltas; Isın Akyar; Gullu Elgun; Tanıl Kocagoz
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 7.  Enteric protozoa in the developed world: a public health perspective.

Authors:  Stephanie M Fletcher; Damien Stark; John Harkness; John Ellis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 8.  Detection of intestinal protozoa in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Ian H McHardy; Max Wu; Robyn Shimizu-Cohen; Marc Roger Couturier; Romney M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of intestinal protozoan morphology in polyvinyl alcohol preservative: comparison of zinc sulfate- and mercuric chloride-based compounds for use in Schaudinn's fixative.

Authors:  L S Garcia; R Y Shimizu; A Shum; D A Bruckner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Identification and preservation of intestinal parasites using methylene blue-glycerol mount: a new approach to stool microscopy.

Authors:  Vinay Khanna; Kriti Tilak; Shihnin Rasheed; Chiranjay Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  J Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-04-10
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Is the Medium Still the Message? Culture-Independent Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Infections.

Authors:  Neil Sood; Gary Carbell; Holly S Greenwald; Frank K Friedenberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Progress in Automated Urinalysis.

Authors:  Matthijs Oyaert; Joris Delanghe
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Utility of an Automatic Vision-Based Examination System (AVE-562) for the Detection of Clonorchis sinensis Eggs in Stool.

Authors:  Yu Jeong Lee; Eun Jeong Won; Young-Chang Cho; Soo Hyun Kim; Myung Geun Shin; Jong Hee Shin
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.464

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.