Literature DB >> 24780790

Patient outcomes after treatment with percutaneous cholecystostomy for biliary sepsis.

S M Flexer1, M B Peter, A C Durham-Hall, J R Ausobsky.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acute cholecystitis is among the most common general surgical presentations. There is a cohort of patients who develop systemic sepsis and complications of acute cholecystitis. These patients are often elderly and co-morbid. Conservative management with percutaneous cholecystostomy has been shown to be a safe and effective management option in the acute setting. However, there is currently no consensus for the further management of these patients. In particular, there is a paucity of data on readmission rates and subsequent operative or non-operative management.
METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out of patients treated with a percutaneous cholecystostomy for biliary sepsis over a three-year period in a UK teaching hospital. Outcome measures were subsequent operative or conservative management, conversion rates, operative complications and readmission rates.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients had a percutaneous cholecystostomy for the treatment of acute biliary sepsis. The median follow-up duration was 35 months. Thirteen patients (52%) had operative treatment. In the operative group, 6/13 had a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 2/13 had a planned open cholecystectomy, 2/13 had abandoned procedures and 3/13 had a converted procedure. Complications in the operative group included: postoperative mortality (1/13), common bile duct injury requiring drainage and endoscopic stenting (1/13) and one patient required readmission with recurrent pain. In the non-operative group, 5/12 patients were readmitted with biliary sepsis, 5/12 had no readmissions, 1/12 died in the community and 1/12 was readmitted with biliary colic.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a recognised treatment modality for elderly, co-morbid patients with biliary sepsis. Nevertheless, the readmission rate in this group is relatively high at 5/12 (42%). Patients who undergo subsequent operative management have a conversion rate of 3/13 (23%) and a significant complication rate of 2/13 (15%). The further management of patients having undergone percutaneous cholecystostomy requires careful consideration on an individual case basis. The P-POSSUM (Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity) may aid decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24780790      PMCID: PMC4474055          DOI: 10.1308/003588414X13814021679799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  18 in total

1.  Conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evolution from 1993 and current state.

Authors:  Francesco Domenico Capizzi; Luciano Fogli; Mauro Brulatti; Sergio Boschi; Marco Di Domenico; Vito Papa; Patrizio Patrizi
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  An alternative approach to acute cholecystitis. Percutaneous cholecystostomy and interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E J Patterson; R F McLoughlin; J R Mathieson; P L Cooperberg; J K MacFarlane
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the elderly: is it safe?

Authors:  Boris Kirshtein; Michael Bayme; Arkady Bolotin; Solly Mizrahi; Leonid Lantsberg
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.719

4.  Surgical management of acute cholecystitis at a tertiary care center in the modern era.

Authors:  Jason T Wiseman; Maia N Sharuk; Anand Singla; Mitchell Cahan; Demetrius E M Litwin; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-05

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  K Gurusamy; K Samraj; C Gluud; E Wilson; B R Davidson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Anders Winbladh; Per Gullstrand; Joar Svanvik; Per Sandström
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within and beyond 72 h of symptom onset during emergency admissions.

Authors:  Bin Zhu; Zhanzhi Zhang; Yan Wang; Ke Gong; Yiping Lu; Nengwei Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Management of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: contemporary role for cholecystostomy and subsequent cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Bryan C Morse; J Brandon Smith; Richard B Lawdahl; Richard H Roettger
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Management of acute gallbladder disease in England.

Authors:  G G David; A A Al-Sarira; S Willmott; M Deakin; D J Corless; J P Slavin
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  A 10-year follow-up of a longitudinal study of gallstone prevalence at necropsy in South East England.

Authors:  Hamed N Khan; Margaret Harrison; Eryl E Bassett; Tom Bates
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.199

View more
  5 in total

1.  The impact of frailty syndrome and risk scores on emergency cholecystectomy patients.

Authors:  Laura Lorenzon; Gianluca Costa; Giulia Massa; Barbara Frezza; Francesco Stella; Genoveffa Balducci
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Percutaneous aspiration of the gall bladder for the treatment of acute cholecystitis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ilana Haas; Elon Lahat; Ygal Griton; Pavel Shmulevsky; Stanislav Shichman; Guy Elad; Chagay Kammar; Ori Yaslovich; Shai Kendror; Anat Ben-Ari; Haim Paran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy… why, when, what next? A systematic review of past decade.

Authors:  M Elsharif; A Forouzanfar; K Oaikhinan; Niraj Khetan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy for severe (Tokyo 2013 stage III) acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  F Polistina; C Mazzucco; D Coco; M Frego
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 5.  Emergency surgery in the elderly: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Andrew D W Torrance; Susan L Powell; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2015-09-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.