Literature DB >> 20698375

Management of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: contemporary role for cholecystostomy and subsequent cholecystectomy.

Bryan C Morse1, J Brandon Smith, Richard B Lawdahl, Richard H Roettger.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients carries a high mortality rate. Although decompression and drainage of the gallbladder through a cholecystostomy tube may be used as a temporary treatment of acute cholecystitis in this population, there is still some debate about the management of the tube and the subsequent need for a cholecystectomy. This series evaluates the clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients who underwent the insertion of cholecystostomy tubes for the initial treatment of acute cholecystitis. This is a retrospective review of critically ill patients admitted to the hospital intensive care unit who were diagnosed with acute cholecystitis and underwent a cholecystostomy tube as a temporary treatment for the disease. Patients were identified through the Greenville Hospital System electronic medical records coding database. Medical records were reviewed for demographic data, diagnoses, imaging, complications, and outcomes. From January 2002 through June 2008, 50 patients were identified for the study. The mean age was 72 +/- 11 years, and the majority (66%) were men. The following comorbidities were found: severe cardiovascular disease (40 patients), respiratory failure (30 patients), and multisystem organ dysfunction (30 patients). The mean intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) was 16 +/- 9 days, and the mean hospital LOS was 28 +/- 27 days. At 30 days, the morbidity associated with the cholecystostomy tube itself was 4 per cent, but overall in-hospital morbidity and mortality rates were 62 and 50 per cent, respectively. Of the 25 patients who survived longer than 30 days, 12 retained their cholecystostomy tubes until they underwent cholecystectomy (four open, seven laparoscopic). All of the remaining 13 patients had their cholecystostomy tubes removed, and eight developed recurrent cholecystitis. Of these patients with recurrent of cholecystitis, five had cholecystectomy or repeat cholecystostomy, but the remaining three patients died. Although this is a small patient population, these data suggest that, in critically ill patients, cholecystostomy tubes should remain in place until the patient is deemed medically suitable to undergo cholecystectomy. Removal of the cholecystostomy tube without subsequent cholecystectomy is associated with a high incidence of recurrent cholecystitis and devastating consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20698375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  31 in total

Review 1.  [The intensive care gallbladder as shock organ: symptoms and therapy].

Authors:  C Rimkus; J C Kalff
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Timing of percutaneous cholecystostomy affects conversion rate of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Amitai Bickel; Rotem Sivan Hoffman; Norman Loberant; Michael Weiss; Arieh Eitan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  An alternative percutaneous technique for gallbladder drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents.

Authors:  Michael Kostrzewa; Rebecca Zener; Lee L Swanström; Eran Shlomovitz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Is surgical cholecystectomy better than percutaneous in treatment of acute cholecystitis in patients unfit for surgery?

Authors:  Enver Zerem; Safet Omerović; Bilal Imširović
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystostomy tube-guided hepatotomy and cholecystolithotomy: alternative strategy for treatment of severe chronic cholecystitis.

Authors:  N Horesh; M Gutman; D Rosin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Routine surveillance cholangiography after percutaneous cholecystostomy delays drain removal and cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Scott C Brakenridge; Frederick A Moore; Camille G Dessaigne; George A Sarosi; William J Zingarelli; Janeen R Jordan; Chasen A Croft; R Stephen Smith; Philip A Efron; Alicia M Mohr
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.313

7.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy… why, when, what next? A systematic review of past decade.

Authors:  M Elsharif; A Forouzanfar; K Oaikhinan; Niraj Khetan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy is safe and effective option for acute calculous cholecystitis in select group of high-risk patients.

Authors:  M Bala; I Mizrahi; H Mazeh; J Yuval; A Eid; G Almogy
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Role of percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute acalculous cholecystitis: clinical outcomes of 271 patients.

Authors:  Seung Yeon Noh; Dong Il Gwon; Gi-Young Ko; Hyun-Ki Yoon; Kyu-Bo Sung
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  High rate of common bile duct stones and postoperative abscess following percutaneous cholecystostomy.

Authors:  R Furtado; P Le Page; G Dunn; G L Falk
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.