Literature DB >> 24780696

Robust, accurate and fast automatic segmentation of the spinal cord.

Benjamin De Leener1, Samuel Kadoury2, Julien Cohen-Adad3.   

Abstract

Spinal cord segmentation provides measures of atrophy and facilitates group analysis via inter-subject correspondence. Automatizing this procedure enables studies with large throughput and minimizes user bias. Although several automatic segmentation methods exist, they are often restricted in terms of image contrast and field-of-view. This paper presents a new automatic segmentation method (PropSeg) optimized for robustness, accuracy and speed. The algorithm is based on the propagation of a deformable model and is divided into three parts: firstly, an initialization step detects the spinal cord position and orientation using a circular Hough transform on multiple axial slices rostral and caudal to the starting plane and builds an initial elliptical tubular mesh. Secondly, a low-resolution deformable model is propagated along the spinal cord. To deal with highly variable contrast levels between the spinal cord and the cerebrospinal fluid, the deformation is coupled with a local contrast-to-noise adaptation at each iteration. Thirdly, a refinement process and a global deformation are applied on the propagated mesh to provide an accurate segmentation of the spinal cord. Validation was performed in 15 healthy subjects and two patients with spinal cord injury, using T1- and T2-weighted images of the entire spinal cord and on multiecho T2*-weighted images. Our method was compared against manual segmentation and against an active surface method. Results show high precision for all the MR sequences. Dice coefficients were 0.9 for the T1- and T2-weighted cohorts and 0.86 for the T2*-weighted images. The proposed method runs in less than 1min on a normal computer and can be used to quantify morphological features such as cross-sectional area along the whole spinal cord.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic; Deformable model; MRI; Propagation; Spinal cord segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24780696     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  41 in total

1.  Correlations between cervical spinal cord magnetic resonance diffusion tensor and diffusion kurtosis imaging metrics and motor performance in patients with chronic ischemic brain lesions of the corticospinal tract.

Authors:  Valentina Panara; R Navarra; P A Mattei; E Piccirilli; V Bartoletti; A Uncini; M Caulo
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Convolutional Neural Network-Based Automated Segmentation of the Spinal Cord and Contusion Injury: Deep Learning Biomarker Correlates of Motor Impairment in Acute Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  D B McCoy; S M Dupont; C Gros; J Cohen-Adad; R J Huie; A Ferguson; X Duong-Fernandez; L H Thomas; V Singh; J Narvid; L Pascual; N Kyritsis; M S Beattie; J C Bresnahan; S Dhall; W Whetstone; J F Talbott
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Spatial distribution of multiple sclerosis lesions in the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Dominique Eden; Charley Gros; Atef Badji; Sara M Dupont; Benjamin De Leener; Josefina Maranzano; Ren Zhuoquiong; Yaou Liu; Tobias Granberg; Russell Ouellette; Leszek Stawiarz; Jan Hillert; Jason Talbott; Elise Bannier; Anne Kerbrat; Gilles Edan; Pierre Labauge; Virginie Callot; Jean Pelletier; Bertrand Audoin; Henitsoa Rasoanandrianina; Jean-Christophe Brisset; Paola Valsasina; Maria A Rocca; Massimo Filippi; Rohit Bakshi; Shahamat Tauhid; Ferran Prados; Marios Yiannakas; Hugh Kearney; Olga Ciccarelli; Seth A Smith; Constantina Andrada Treaba; Caterina Mainero; Jennifer Lefeuvre; Daniel S Reich; Govind Nair; Timothy M Shepherd; Erik Charlson; Yasuhiko Tachibana; Masaaki Hori; Kouhei Kamiya; Lydia Chougar; Sridar Narayanan; Julien Cohen-Adad
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  MRI Atlas-Based Measurement of Spinal Cord Injury Predicts Outcome in Acute Flaccid Myelitis.

Authors:  D B McCoy; J F Talbott; Michael Wilson; M D Mamlouk; J Cohen-Adad; Mark Wilson; J Narvid
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  On computerized methods for spine analysis in MRI: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marko Rak; Klaus D Tönnies
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Spinal cord microstructure integrating phase-sensitive inversion recovery and diffusional kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  V Panara; R Navarra; P A Mattei; E Piccirilli; A R Cotroneo; N Papinutto; R G Henry; A Uncini; M Caulo
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  Future Brain and Spinal Cord Volumetric Imaging in the Clinic for Monitoring Treatment Response in MS.

Authors:  Tim Sinnecker; Cristina Granziera; Jens Wuerfel; Regina Schlaeger
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Fully automatic 3D segmentation of the thoracolumbar spinal cord and the vertebral canal from T2-weighted MRI using K-means clustering algorithm.

Authors:  Sahar Sabaghian; Hamed Dehghani; Seyed Amir Hossein Batouli; Ali Khatibi; Mohammad Ali Oghabian
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 9.  Segmentation of the human spinal cord.

Authors:  Benjamin De Leener; Manuel Taso; Julien Cohen-Adad; Virginie Callot
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  g-Ratio weighted imaging of the human spinal cord in vivo.

Authors:  T Duval; S Le Vy; N Stikov; J Campbell; A Mezer; T Witzel; B Keil; V Smith; L L Wald; E Klawiter; J Cohen-Adad
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.