Literature DB >> 26861655

On computerized methods for spine analysis in MRI: a systematic review.

Marko Rak1, Klaus D Tönnies2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the last decades, the increasing medical interest in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine gave rise to a growing number of publications on computerized methods for spine analysis, covering goals such as localization and segmentation of vertebrae and intervertebral discs as well as the extraction and segmentation of the spinal canal and cord. We provide a critical systematic review to work in the field, putting focus on approaches that can be applied to different imaging sequences and settings.
METHODS: Work is analysed on two levels. First, methods are reviewed in detail so that the reader understands justifications and constraints of particular work. Second, work is classified according to relevant attributes and tabulated to give an impression on recent trends. We discuss the general methodical and evaluational aspects of the work as well as challenges specific to MRI such as the lack of intensity standardization and partial volume effects.
RESULTS: Methods can be condensed to a small number of optimization frameworks, e.g., graphical models, cost-minimal paths and deformable models. Works sharing the same framework mainly differentiate by the types of information, i.e., pose, geometry and appearance, that are used and by the implementation thereof. MRI-specific challenges are rarely addressed explicitly, calling into question the applicability of most methods to changing imaging sequences or settings. Most often, little attention is paid to evaluation, meaning that results lack comparability and reproducibility although publicly available data sets exist.
CONCLUSION: The diversity of MRI sequences and settings still poses challenges to computerized spine analysis. Further research is necessary to implement methods that are actually applicable in practice, e.g., in clinical routine or for study purposes. Certainly, manual guidance will be necessary at some point, for instance to deal with changing subject positions. Therefore, future work should put attention to the appropriate integration of manual interaction.

Keywords:  Extraction; Localization; Magnetic resonance imaging; Segmentation; Spine analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26861655     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-016-1350-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  57 in total

1.  Labeling of lumbar discs using both pixel- and object-level features with a two-level probabilistic model.

Authors:  Raja' S Alomari; Jason J Corso; Vipin Chaudhary
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Automated localization and identification of lower spinal anatomy in magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  M P Chwialkowski; P E Shile; D Pfeifer; R W Parkey; R M Peshock
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1991-04

3.  MRI analysis of lumbar intervertebral disc height in young and older populations.

Authors:  N Roberts; C Gratin; G H Whitehouse
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Robust MR spine detection using hierarchical learning and local articulated model.

Authors:  Yiqiang Zhan; Dewan Maneesh; Martin Harder; Xiang Sean Zhou
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2012

5.  Automatic segmentation of spinal cord MRI using symmetric boundary tracing.

Authors:  Dipti Prasad Mukherjee; Irene Cheng; Nilanjan Ray; Vivian Mushahwar; Marc Lebel; Anup Basu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2010-06-07

6.  Robust, accurate and fast automatic segmentation of the spinal cord.

Authors:  Benjamin De Leener; Samuel Kadoury; Julien Cohen-Adad
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Atlas-based segmentation of degenerated lumbar intervertebral discs from MR images of the spine.

Authors:  Sofia K Michopoulou; Lena Costaridou; Elias Panagiotopoulos; Robert Speller; George Panayiotakis; Andrew Todd-Pokropek
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Robust parametric modeling approach based on domain knowledge for computer aided detection of vertebrae column metastases in MRI.

Authors:  A K Jerebko; G P Schmidt; X Zhou; J Bi; V Anand; J Liu; S Schoenberg; I Schmuecking; B Kiefer; A Krishnan
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2007

9.  Cube-cut: vertebral body segmentation in MRI-data through cubic-shaped divergences.

Authors:  Robert Schwarzenberg; Bernd Freisleben; Christopher Nimsky; Jan Egger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Application of a B-spline active surface technique to the measurement of cervical cord volume in multiple sclerosis from three-dimensional MR images.

Authors:  Simon J Hickman; Olivier Coulon; Geoffrey J M Parker; Gareth J Barker; Valerie L Stevenson; Declan T Chard; Simon R Arridge; Alan J Thompson; David H Miller
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  4 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Fully automatic cross-modality localization and labeling of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs in 3D spinal images.

Authors:  Maria Wimmer; David Major; Alexey A Novikov; Katja Bühler
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Automated assessment of paraspinal muscle fat composition based on the segmentation of chemical shift encoding-based water/fat-separated images.

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Cristian Lorenz; Christian Buerger; Friedemann Freitag; Michael Dieckmeyer; Holger Eggers; Claus Zimmer; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Jan S Kirschke
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2018-11-07

4.  Lumbar Intervertebral Disc and Discovertebral Segment, Part 1: An Imaging Review of Normal Anatomy.

Authors:  Daphne J Theodorou; Stavroula J Theodorou; Ioannis D Gelalis; Yousuke Kakitsubata
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.