Literature DB >> 24779954

Use of stress analysis methods to evaluate the biomechanics of oral rehabilitation with implants.

Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira1, Marcelo Coelho Goiato, Humberto Gennari Filho, Douglas Roberto Monteiro, Daniela Micheline Dos Santos, Marcela Filié Haddad, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer.   

Abstract

Because the biomechanical behavior of dental implants is different from that of natural tooth, clinical problems may occur. The mechanism of stress distribution and load transfer to the implant/bone interface is a critical issue affecting the success rate of implants. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a brief literature review of the available stress analysis methods to study implant-supported prosthesis loading and to discuss their contributions in the biomechanical evaluation of oral rehabilitation with implants. Several studies have used experimental, analytical, and computational models by means of finite element models (FEM), photoelasticity, strain gauges and associations of these methods to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of dental implants. The FEM has been used to evaluate new components, configurations, materials, and shapes of implants. The greatest advantage of the photoelastic method is the ability to visualize the stresses in complex structures, such as oral structures, and to observe the stress patterns in the whole model, allowing the researcher to localize and quantify the stress magnitude. Strain gauges can be used to assess in vivo and in vitro stress in prostheses, implants, and teeth. Some authors use the strain gauge technique with photoelasticity or FEM techniques. These methodologies can be widely applied in dentistry, mainly in the research field. Therefore, they can guide further research and clinical studies by predicting some disadvantages and streamlining clinical time.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24779954     DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  12 in total

1.  A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal.

Authors:  Romy Angeles Maslucan; John Alexis Dominguez
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Biomechanical Stress in Obturator Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Studies.

Authors:  Mohammed A Mousa; Johari Yap Abdullah; Nafij B Jamayet; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Adam Husein
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Physical and photoelastic properties of bulk-fill and conventional composites.

Authors:  Renata Pereira; Maria Cecília Caldas Giorgi; Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins; Jéssica Dias Theobaldo; Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima; Giselle Maria Marchi; Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-12-12

Review 4.  Application of Finite Element Model in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  M Sesha Reddy; Rajasekar Sundram; Hossam Abdelatty Eid Abdemagyd
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2019-05

5.  A Comparative 3D Finite Element Computational Study of Three Connections.

Authors:  Davide Farronato; Mattia Manfredini; Andrea Stevanello; Veronica Campana; Lorenzo Azzi; Marco Farronato
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.

Authors:  Fabricia Teixeira Barbosa; Luiz Carlos Silveira Zanatta; Edélcio de Souza Rendohl; Sergio Alexandre Gehrke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Biomechanical analysis of rigid and non-rigid connection with implant abutment designs for tooth-implant supported prosthesis: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yen-Chang Huang; Shinn-Jyh Ding; Cadmus Yuan; Min Yan
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 2.080

8.  Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible.

Authors:  Lana Zupancic Cepic; Martin Frank; Andreas Reisinger; Dieter Pahr; Werner Zechner; Andreas Schedle
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-02-11

9.  Mechanical properties of resin glass fiber-reinforced abutment in comparison to titanium abutment.

Authors:  Mirko Andreasi Bassi; Rossella Bedini; Raffella Pecci; Pietro Ioppolo; Dorina Lauritano; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2015 May-Jun

10.  Dynamic Modelling of Tooth Deformation Using Occlusal Kinematics and Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Benazzi; Huynh Nhu Nguyen; Ottmar Kullmer; Kornelius Kupczik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.