Literature DB >> 24779867

Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores.

Melissa M Garrido1, Amy S Kelley, Julia Paris, Katherine Roza, Diane E Meier, R Sean Morrison, Melissa D Aldridge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To model the steps involved in preparing for and carrying out propensity score analyses by providing step-by-step guidance and Stata code applied to an empirical dataset. STUDY
DESIGN: Guidance, Stata code, and empirical examples are given to illustrate (1) the process of choosing variables to include in the propensity score; (2) balance of propensity score across treatment and comparison groups; (3) balance of covariates across treatment and comparison groups within blocks of the propensity score; (4) choice of matching and weighting strategies; (5) balance of covariates after matching or weighting the sample; and (6) interpretation of treatment effect estimates. EMPIRICAL APPLICATION: We use data from the Palliative Care for Cancer Patients (PC4C) study, a multisite observational study of the effect of inpatient palliative care on patient health outcomes and health services use, to illustrate the development and use of a propensity score.
CONCLUSIONS: Propensity scores are one useful tool for accounting for observed differences between treated and comparison groups. Careful testing of propensity scores is required before using them to estimate treatment effects. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Observational data/quasi-experiments; administrative data uses; patient outcomes/function

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24779867      PMCID: PMC4213057          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  21 in total

1.  Cost savings from assertive community treatment services in an era of declining psychiatric inpatient use.

Authors:  Eric P Slade; John F McCarthy; Marcia Valenstein; Stephanie Visnic; Lisa B Dixon
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Variable selection for propensity score models when estimating treatment effects on multiple outcomes: a simulation study.

Authors:  Richard Wyss; Cynthia J Girman; Robert J LoCasale; Alan M Brookhart; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Applying propensity score methods in medical research: pitfalls and prospects.

Authors:  Zhehui Luo; Joseph C Gardiner; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Application of a propensity score approach for risk adjustment in profiling multiple physician groups on asthma care.

Authors:  I-Chan Huang; Constantine Frangakis; Francesca Dominici; Gregory B Diette; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys.

Authors:  Eva H Dugoff; Megan Schuler; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Choosing models for health care cost analyses: issues of nonlinearity and endogeneity.

Authors:  Melissa M Garrido; Partha Deb; James F Burgess; Joan D Penrod
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Duration of breastfeeding and childhood obesity: a generalized propensity score approach.

Authors:  Miao Jiang; E Michael Foster
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stuart; Brian K Lee; Finbarr P Leacy
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.894

View more
  190 in total

1.  Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation and 30-Day Readmissions in Oncology.

Authors:  Lisa D DiMartino; Bryan J Weiner; Laura C Hanson; Morris Weinberger; Sarah A Birken; Katherine Reeder-Hayes; Justin G Trogdon
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Falsification Testing of Instrumental Variables Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research.

Authors:  Steven D Pizer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Comparing the Cost of Care Provided to Medicare Beneficiaries Assigned to Primary Care Nurse Practitioners and Physicians.

Authors:  Jennifer Perloff; Catherine M DesRoches; Peter Buerhaus
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-12-27       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Rural-urban disparities in health care costs and health service utilization following pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Janessa M Graves; Jessica L Mackelprang; Megan Moore; Demetrius A Abshire; Frederick P Rivara; Nathalia Jimenez; Molly Fuentes; Monica S Vavilala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Health-related outcomes of critically ill patients with and without sepsis.

Authors:  Kelly Thompson; Colman Taylor; Stephen Jan; Qiang Li; Naomi Hammond; John Myburgh; Manoj Saxena; Balasubramanian Venkatesh; Simon Finfer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  A Palliative Radiation Oncology Consult Service's Impact on Care of Advanced Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sanders Chang; Peter May; Nathan E Goldstein; Juan Wisnivesky; Kenneth Rosenzweig; R Sean Morrison; Kavita V Dharmarajan
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Comparison of Direct and Less Invasive Techniques for the Treatment of Severe Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease.

Authors:  Kimberly C Zamor; Andrew W Hoel; Irene B Helenowski; Adam W Beck; Joseph R Schneider; Karen J Ho
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.466

8.  African-American race and mortality in interstitial lung disease: a multicentre propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Ayodeji Adegunsoye; Justin M Oldham; Shashi K Bellam; Jonathan H Chung; Paul A Chung; Kathleen M Biblowitz; Steven Montner; Cathryn Lee; Scully Hsu; Aliya N Husain; Rekha Vij; Gokhan Mutlu; Imre Noth; Matthew M Churpek; Mary E Strek
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  Veridical Causal Inference using Propensity Score Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research with Medical Claims.

Authors:  Ryan D Ross; Xu Shi; Megan E V Caram; Pheobe A Tsao; Paul Lin; Amy Bohnert; Min Zhang; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2020-10-20

10.  Outcomes of Multiple Listing for Adult Heart Transplantation in the United States: Analysis of OPTN Data From 2000 to 2013.

Authors:  Raymond C Givens; Todd Dardas; Kevin J Clerkin; Susan Restaino; P Christian Schulze; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 12.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.