Literature DB >> 34040495

Veridical Causal Inference using Propensity Score Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research with Medical Claims.

Ryan D Ross1, Xu Shi1, Megan E V Caram2,3,4, Pheobe A Tsao2, Paul Lin4, Amy Bohnert3,4,5, Min Zhang1, Bhramar Mukherjee1.   

Abstract

Medical insurance claims are becoming increasingly common data sources to answer a variety of questions in biomedical research. Although comprehensive in terms of longitudinal characterization of disease development and progression for a potentially large number of patients, population-based inference using these datasets require thoughtful modifications to sample selection and analytic strategies relative to other types of studies. Along with complex selection bias and missing data issues, claims-based studies are purely observational, which limits effective understanding and characterization of the treatment differences between groups being compared. All these issues contribute to a crisis in reproducibility and replication of comparative findings using medical claims. This paper offers practical guidance to the analytical process, demonstrates methods for estimating causal treatment effects with propensity score methods for several types of outcomes common to such studies, such as binary, count, time to event and longitudinally-varying measures, and also aims to increase transparency and reproducibility of reporting of results from these investigations. We provide an online version of the paper with readily implementable code for the entire analysis pipeline to serve as a guided tutorial for practitioners. The online version can be accessed at https://rydaro.github.io/. The analytic pipeline is illustrated using a sub-cohort of patients with advanced prostate cancer from the large Clinformatics TM Data Mart Database (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, Minnesota), consisting of 73 million distinct private payer insurees from 2001-2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  average treatment effect; covariate adjustment; hormone therapy; insurance claims; matching; prostate cancer; reproducibility; sensitivity analysis; veridical data science

Year:  2020        PMID: 34040495      PMCID: PMC8142944          DOI: 10.1007/s10742-020-00222-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol        ISSN: 1387-3741


  66 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Propensity-Score Methods and Their Use in Cardiovascular Research.

Authors:  Saswata Deb; Peter C Austin; Jack V Tu; Dennis T Ko; C David Mazer; Alex Kiss; Stephen E Fremes
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 2.  A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Paul Grootendorst; Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Moving beyond the hazard ratio in quantifying the between-group difference in survival analysis.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Brian Claggett; Lu Tian; Eisuke Inoue; Paul Gallo; Toshio Miyata; Deborah Schrag; Masahiro Takeuchi; Yoshiaki Uyama; Lihui Zhao; Hicham Skali; Scott Solomon; Susanna Jacobus; Michael Hughes; Milton Packer; Lee-Jen Wei
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Association of Mood and Anxiety Disorders and Opioid Prescription Patterns Among Postpartum Women.

Authors:  Nichole Nidey; Ryan Carnahan; Knute D Carter; Lane Strathearn; Wei Bao; Andrea Greiner; Laura Jelliffee-Pawlowski; Karen M Tabb; Kelli Ryckman
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2020-04-06

6.  Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.894

7.  Restricted mean survival time: an alternative to the hazard ratio for the design and analysis of randomized trials with a time-to-event outcome.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Mahesh K B Parmar
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Assessing the performance of the generalized propensity score for estimating the effect of quantitative or continuous exposures on binary outcomes.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Principles of confounder selection.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Comparative Effectiveness of Generic Atorvastatin and Lipitor® in Patients Hospitalized with an Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Cynthia A Jackevicius; Jack V Tu; Harlan M Krumholz; Peter C Austin; Joseph S Ross; Therese A Stukel; Maria Koh; Alice Chong; Dennis T Ko
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  1 in total

1.  Risk of Alzheimer's Disease Following Influenza Vaccination: A Claims-Based Cohort Study Using Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Avram S Bukhbinder; Yaobin Ling; Omar Hasan; Xiaoqian Jiang; Yejin Kim; Kamal N Phelps; Rosemarie E Schmandt; Albert Amran; Ryan Coburn; Srivathsan Ramesh; Qian Xiao; Paul E Schulz
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.160

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.