OBJECTIVE: The decision to admit a patient to the ICU is complex, reflecting patient factors and available resources. Previous work has shown that ICU census does not impact mortality of patients admitted to the ICU. However, the effect of ICU bed availability on patients outside the ICU is unknown. We sought to determine the association between ICU bed availability, ICU readmissions, and ward cardiac arrests. DESIGN: In this observational study using data collected between 2009 and 2011, rates of ICU readmission and ward cardiac arrest were determined per 12-hour shift. The relationship between these rates and the number of available ICU beds at the start of each shift (accounting for census and nursing capacity) was investigated. Grouped logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. SETTING: Five specialized adult ICUs comprising 63 adult ICU beds in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Any patient admitted to a non-ICU inpatient unit was counted in the ward census and considered at risk for ward cardiac arrest. Patients discharged from an ICU were considered at risk for ICU readmission. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were available for 2,086 of 2,190 shifts. The odds of ICU readmission increased with each decrease in the overall number of available ICU beds (odds ratio = 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00-1.12; p = 0.03), with a similar but not statistically significant association demonstrated in ward cardiac arrest rate (odds ratio = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98-1.14; p = 0.16). In subgroup analysis, the odds of ward cardiac arrest increased with each decrease in the number of medical ICU beds available (odds ratio = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06-1.49; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced ICU bed availability is associated with increased rates of ICU readmission and ward cardiac arrest. This suggests that systemic factors are associated with patient outcomes, and flexible critical care resources may be needed when demand is high.
OBJECTIVE: The decision to admit a patient to the ICU is complex, reflecting patient factors and available resources. Previous work has shown that ICU census does not impact mortality of patients admitted to the ICU. However, the effect of ICU bed availability on patients outside the ICU is unknown. We sought to determine the association between ICU bed availability, ICU readmissions, and ward cardiac arrests. DESIGN: In this observational study using data collected between 2009 and 2011, rates of ICU readmission and ward cardiac arrest were determined per 12-hour shift. The relationship between these rates and the number of available ICU beds at the start of each shift (accounting for census and nursing capacity) was investigated. Grouped logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. SETTING: Five specialized adult ICUs comprising 63 adult ICU beds in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Any patient admitted to a non-ICU inpatient unit was counted in the ward census and considered at risk for ward cardiac arrest. Patients discharged from an ICU were considered at risk for ICU readmission. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were available for 2,086 of 2,190 shifts. The odds of ICU readmission increased with each decrease in the overall number of available ICU beds (odds ratio = 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00-1.12; p = 0.03), with a similar but not statistically significant association demonstrated in ward cardiac arrest rate (odds ratio = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98-1.14; p = 0.16). In subgroup analysis, the odds of ward cardiac arrest increased with each decrease in the number of medical ICU beds available (odds ratio = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06-1.49; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced ICU bed availability is associated with increased rates of ICU readmission and ward cardiac arrest. This suggests that systemic factors are associated with patient outcomes, and flexible critical care resources may be needed when demand is high.
Authors: C L Sprung; D Geber; L A Eidelman; M Baras; R Pizov; A Nimrod; A Oppenheim; L Epstein; S Cotev Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: E W Ely; A M Baker; D P Dunagan; H L Burke; A C Smith; P T Kelly; M M Johnson; R W Browder; D L Bowton; E F Haponik Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-12-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dale M Needham; Susan E Bronskill; Jonah R Calinawan; William J Sibbald; Peter J Pronovost; Andreas Laupacis Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Matthew M Churpek; Blair Wendlandt; Frank J Zadravecz; Richa Adhikari; Christopher Winslow; Dana P Edelson Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Maheer M Masood; Douglas R Farquhar; Christopher Biancaniello; Trevor G Hackman Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Nelleke van Sluisveld; Ferishta Bakhshi-Raiez; Nicolette de Keizer; Rebecca Holman; Gert Wester; Hub Wollersheim; Johannes G van der Hoeven; Marieke Zegers Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Bertrand Guidet; Helene Vallet; Jacques Boddaert; Dylan W de Lange; Alessandro Morandi; Guillaume Leblanc; Antonio Artigas; Hans Flaatten Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: Oleksa G Rewa; Henry T Stelfox; Armann Ingolfsson; David A Zygun; Robin Featherstone; Dawn Opgenorth; Sean M Bagshaw Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 9.097