Literature DB >> 8948561

Effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying patients capable of breathing spontaneously.

E W Ely1, A M Baker, D P Dunagan, H L Burke, A C Smith, P T Kelly, M M Johnson, R W Browder, D L Bowton, E F Haponik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prompt recognition of the reversal of respiratory failure may permit earlier discontinuation of mechanical ventilation, without harm to the patient.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial in 300 adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation in medical and coronary intensive care units. In the intervention group, patients underwent daily screening of respiratory function by physicians, respiratory therapists, and nurses to identify those possibly capable of breathing spontaneously; successful tests were followed by two-hour trials of spontaneous breathing in those who met the criteria. Physicians were notified when their patients successfully completed the trials of spontaneous breathing. The control subjects had daily screening but no other interventions. In both groups, all clinical decisions, including the decision to discontinue mechanical ventilation, were made by the attending physicians.
RESULTS: Although the 149 patients randomly assigned to the intervention group had more severe disease, they received mechanical ventilation for a median of 4.5 days, as compared with 6 days in the 151 patients in the control group (P=0.003). The median interval between the time a patient met the screening criteria and the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation was one day in the intervention group and three days in the control group (P<0.001). Complications -- removal of the breathing tube by the patient, reintubation, tracheostomy, and mechanical ventilation for more than 21 days -- occurred in 20 percent of the intervention group and 41 percent of the control group (P=0.001). The number of days of intensive care and hospital care was similar in the two groups. Total costs for the intensive care unit were lower in the intervention group (median, $15,740, vs. $20,890 in the controls, P=0.03); hospital costs were lower, though not significantly so (median, $26,229 and $29,048, respectively; P=0.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Daily screening of the respiratory function of adults receiving mechanical ventilation, followed by trials of spontaneous breathing in appropriate patients and notification of their physicians when the trials were successful, can reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and the cost of intensive care and is associated with fewer complications than usual care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8948561     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199612193352502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  223 in total

Review 1.  Weaning from mechanical ventilation. When paediatric intensive care medicine profits from adult experience and vice-versa.

Authors:  L Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  "One more thing to think about…" Cognitive burden experienced by intensive care unit nurses when implementing a tight glucose control protocol.

Authors:  Lit Soo Ng; Martha A Q Curley
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-01

3.  Hemodynamic assessment: the technique or the physician at fault?

Authors:  Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Surviving intensive care: a report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable.

Authors:  Derek C Angus; Jean Carlet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Optimizing outcomes for older patients treated in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  E Wesley Ely
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  How are children mechanically ventilated in pediatric intensive care units?

Authors:  Adrienne G Randolph
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Chronic critical illness.

Authors:  Judith E Nelson; Christopher E Cox; Aluko A Hope; Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 8.  Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation as a weaning strategy for intubated adults with respiratory failure.

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Maureen O Meade; Azra Premji; Neill K J Adhikari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-09

9.  Neurological examination of critically ill patients: a pragmatic approach. Report of an ESICM expert panel.

Authors:  Tarek Sharshar; Giuseppe Citerio; Peter J D Andrews; Arturo Chieregato; Nicola Latronico; David K Menon; Louis Puybasset; Claudio Sandroni; Robert D Stevens
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Identifying Barriers to Delivering the Awakening and Breathing Coordination, Delirium, and Early Exercise/Mobility Bundle to Minimize Adverse Outcomes for Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Deena Kelly Costa; Matthew R White; Emily Ginier; Milisa Manojlovich; Sushant Govindan; Theodore J Iwashyna; Anne E Sales
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.