Literature DB >> 15753749

Projected incidence of mechanical ventilation in Ontario to 2026: Preparing for the aging baby boomers.

Dale M Needham1, Susan E Bronskill, Jonah R Calinawan, William J Sibbald, Peter J Pronovost, Andreas Laupacis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aging baby boomers are expected to have a significant impact on the healthcare system. Mechanical ventilation is an age-dependent, costly, and relatively nondiscretionary medical service that may be particularly affected by the aging population. We forecast the future incidence of mechanical ventilation to the year 2026 to understand the impact of aging baby boomers on critical care resources.
DESIGN: Population-based, sex-specific, and age-specific mechanical ventilation incidences for adults for the year 2000 were directly standardized to population projections to estimate the incidence of mechanical ventilation, in 5-yr intervals, from 2006 to 2026. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying population projections and mechanical ventilation incidence for the elderly.
SETTING: Province of Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: Noncardiac surgery, mechanically ventilated adults.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN
RESULTS: The projected number of ventilated patients in 2026 was 34,478, representing an 80% increase from 2000. The crude incidence increased 31%, from 222 to 291 per 100,000 adults. The annually compounded projected growth rate during this 26-yr period was 2.3%, similar to the actual growth rate experienced in the 1990s. The projected incidence was relatively insensitive to changes in assumptions, with estimates for 2026 ranging from 31,473 to 36,313 ventilated adults.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of mechanical ventilation projected to the year 2026 will steadily increase and outpace population growth as occurred in the 1990s. In the current environment in which intensive care unit resources are limited and ventilated patients already use a significant proportion of acute care resources, planning for this continued growth is necessary. Existing evidence-based strategies that improve both the efficiency and efficacy of critical care services should be carefully evaluated for widespread implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15753749     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000155992.21174.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  78 in total

1.  Development of demographics and outcome of very old critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units.

Authors:  Gerald C Ihra; Judith Lehberger; Helene Hochrieser; Peter Bauer; Rene Schmutz; Barbara Metnitz; Philipp G H Metnitz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Limiting acute respiratory distress syndrome in the emergency department: a survey of US academic emergency medicine physicians.

Authors:  Brian M Fuller; Nicholas M Mohr
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.799

3.  The Frailty Phenotype and Palliative Care Needs of Older Survivors of Critical Illness.

Authors:  Lauren R Pollack; Nathan E Goldstein; Wendy C Gonzalez; Craig D Blinderman; Mathew S Maurer; David J Lederer; Matthew R Baldwin
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Impact of interhospital transfer on complications and outcome after intracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ashley R Catalano; H R Winn; Errol Gordon; Jennifer A Frontera
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist improves patient-ventilator interaction.

Authors:  Lise Piquilloud; Laurence Vignaux; Emilie Bialais; Jean Roeseler; Thierry Sottiaux; Pierre-François Laterre; Philippe Jolliet; Didier Tassaux
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Perceptions of "futile care" among caregivers in intensive care units.

Authors:  Robert Sibbald; James Downar; Laura Hawryluck
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Health technology assessment in critical care.

Authors:  Damon C Scales; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Non-invasive ventilation: how far away from the ICU?

Authors:  Alexandre Demoule
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Interventions to improve the physical function of ICU survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Enrique Calvo-Ayala; Babar A Khan; Mark O Farber; E Wesley Ely; Malaz A Boustani
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Comparison of Care Patterns and Rehospitalizations for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in New York and Ontario.

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch; Andrea D Hill; Damon C Scales; Robert A Fowler; May Hua
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.