Literature DB >> 24773446

Pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: tidal vs. forced inspiratory breathing.

D M Hong1, J M Lee, J H Seo, J J Min, Y Jeon, J H Bahk.   

Abstract

We evaluated whether pulse pressure variation can predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Fifty-nine elective thoracic surgical patients were studied before induction of general anaesthesia. After volume expansion with hydroxyethyl starch 6 ml.kg(-1) , patients were defined as responders by a ≥ 15% increase in the cardiac index. Haemodynamic variables were measured before and after volume expansion and pulse pressure variations were calculated during tidal breathing and during forced inspiratory breathing. Median (IQR [range]) pulse pressure variation during forced inspiratory breathing was significantly higher in responders (n = 29) than in non-responders (n = 30) before volume expansion (18.2 (IQR 14.7-18.2 [9.3-31.3])% vs. 10.1 (IQR 8.3-12.6 [4.8-21.1])%, respectively, p < 0.001). The receiver-operating characteristic curve revealed that pulse pressure variation during forced inspiratory breathing could predict fluid responsiveness (area under the curve 0.910, p < 0.0001). Pulse pressure variation measured during forced inspiratory breathing can be used to guide fluid management in spontaneously breathing patients.
© 2014 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24773446     DOI: 10.1111/anae.12678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  10 in total

1.  Utility of stroke volume variation measured using non-invasive bioreactance as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in the prone position.

Authors:  Jeong Jin Min; Jong-Hwan Lee; Kwan Young Hong; Soo Joo Choi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  A robust Fourier-based method to measure pulse pressure variability.

Authors:  Sebastian Acosta; Mubbasheer Ahmed; Suellen M Yin; Ken M Brady; Daniel J Penny; Craig G Rusin
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.880

3.  The effect of fluid resuscitation on the effective circulating volume in patients undergoing liver surgery: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jaap Jan Vos; A F Kalmar; H G D Hendriks; J Bakker; T W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  What is the impact of the fluid challenge technique on diagnosis of fluid responsiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Toscani; Hollmann D Aya; Dimitra Antonakaki; Davide Bastoni; Ximena Watson; Nish Arulkumaran; Andrew Rhodes; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Assessment of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Renato Carneiro de Freitas Chaves; Thiago Domingos Corrêa; Ary Serpa Neto; Bruno de Arruda Bravim; Ricardo Luiz Cordioli; Fabio Tanzillo Moreira; Karina Tavares Timenetsky; Murillo Santucci Cesar de Assunção
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 6.925

6.  The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Jun; Rack Kyung Chung; Hee Jung Baik; Mi Hwa Chung; Joon-Sang Hyeon; Young-Goo Lee; Sung-Ho Park
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Evaluation of volume responsiveness by pulse pressure variability and inferior vena cava dispensability index at different tidal volumes by mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Fujuan He; Xiaoqiang Li; Suman Thapa; Chi Li; Jiawei Luo; Wenyan Dai; Jin Liu
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.590

8.  Respiratory variations in pulse pressure and photoplethysmographic waveform amplitude during positive expiratory pressure and continuous positive airway pressure in a model of progressive hypovolemia.

Authors:  Ingrid Elise Hoff; Jonny Hisdal; Svein Aslak Landsverk; Jo Røislien; Knut Arvid Kirkebøen; Lars Øivind Høiseth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A novel particle filtering method for estimation of pulse pressure variation during spontaneous breathing.

Authors:  Sunghan Kim; Fouzia Noor; Mateo Aboy; James McNames
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 10.  One approach to circulation and blood flow in the critical care unit.

Authors:  Camilo Pena-Hernandez; Kenneth Nugent
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-07-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.