Literature DB >> 16575620

Impact of new technologies on the clinical and functional outcome of Altemeier's procedure: a randomized, controlled trial.

Paolo Boccasanta1, Marco Venturi, Sergio Barbieri, Giancarlo Roviaro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A randomized study was performed to assess whether new technologies offer advantages over the conventional technique on the clinical and functional outcome of patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence, submitted to Altemeier's procedure with levatorplasty.
METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2003, 58 patients (55 females; mean age, 70.9 +/- 11.3 years) with full-thickness rectal prolapse were evaluated with continence score, colonoscopy, anorectal manometry, anal electromyography, and sacral reflex latency; 40 of them were selected and randomly assigned to two groups: 20 patients (Group 1; 19 females, 73.4 +/- 10.4 years) were submitted to a conventional operation with monopolar electrocautery and handsewn anastomosis, and 20 (Group 2; 18 females, 71.5 +/- 12.2 years) using harmonic scalpel and circular stapler. Patients were followed up with clinical examination, anorectal manometry, and anal electromyography, with mean follow-up 29.3 +/- 8.5 and 27.5 +/- 9.2 months in Groups 1 and 2, respectively.
RESULTS: Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly reduced in Group 2 (P < 0.001), whereas no differences were found in pain score, time to return to normal activity, morbidity, and mortality. Complications were two (10 percent) stenosis in Group 1. Fecal continence score significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.01), whereas anorectal manometry and neurophysiologic data were not significantly modified by the operation. Recurrence rates were 15 and 10 percent in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P= not significant).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and functional long-term results of perineal rectosigmoidectomy with levatorplasty are not influenced by surgical instruments and type of coloanal anastomosis. The clinical relevance of the short-term results in high-risk patients should be specifically investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16575620     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0505-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  7 in total

1.  Perineal approaches to rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Mari A Madsen
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

2.  Perineal stapled prolapse resection (PSPR) in elderly patients for external rectal prolapse: early experience.

Authors:  E Ram; H Krissi; A Zbar; E Atar; S Joubran; L Rath-Wolfson
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Caitlin W Hicks; Andreas M Kaiser; Karim Alavi; Ranjan Sudan; Paul E Wise
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Primary and repeated perineal stapled prolapse resection.

Authors:  D Raahave; A K Jensen; L Dammegaard; I K Pedersen
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Surgery for complete (full-thickness) rectal prolapse in adults.

Authors:  Samson Tou; Steven R Brown; Richard L Nelson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-24

6.  Prolapse of the rectum, long-term results of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Anders T Hoel; Arne Skarstein; Kjell K Ovrebo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  New kid on the block: perineal stapled prolapse resection (PSP) is it worthwhile in the long-term?

Authors:  Bianka Hummel; Julia Hardt; Stephan Bischofberger; Franc Hetzer; Rene Warschkow; Marcel Zadnikar; Walter Brunner; Bernhard Widmann; Bruno Schmied; Lukas Marti
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.445

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.