Literature DB >> 23222285

Midterm results after perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse.

Diana Sehmer1, Lukas Marti, Katja Wolff, Franc H Hetzer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse improves continence and has short operation times and low complication rates.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the midterm recurrence rates, functional results, and patient satisfaction after perineal stapled prolapse resection.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. SETTINGS: : The study was performed at a tertiary hospital in Switzerland. PATIENTS: From November 2007 to October 2011, a total of 56 consecutive patients were included in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recurrence rates, functional results according to the Wexner incontinence scale, and patient satisfaction using a visual analog scale were determined.
RESULTS: The median age was 78.5 years (range, 24-94 years), and 2 patients were men. Midterm results were available for 46 (82%) of 56 patients after a median follow-up of 25.5 months (range, 2-47 months). In 10 cases (18%) data collection was not possible. The recurrence rate at 3 years was 19.7% (95% CI 4.2%-32.7%). The Wexner incontinence score improved from a median of 14.5 presurgery to 4.0 points (p < 0.0001) after surgery. Twenty-five patients (54%) stated that their bowel movements were regular postoperatively. On a visual analog scale that measured satisfaction, the median patient score was 9 (range, 0-10), indicating high patient satisfaction. LIMITATIONS: Limitations included the retrospective study design and the lack of clinical examinations to determine recurrence rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Perineal stapled prolapse resection is an alternative technique for treating rectal prolapse with a recurrence rate similar to the Altemeier-Mikulicz or Delorme procedures. This technique is a quick and reliable procedure for use in patients with advanced age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23222285     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826cbbea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Complications after rectal prolapse surgery].

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse.

Authors:  G Gallo; J Martellucci; G Pellino; R Ghiselli; A Infantino; F Pucciani; M Trompetto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Perineal stapled prolapse resection (PSPR) in elderly patients for external rectal prolapse: early experience.

Authors:  E Ram; H Krissi; A Zbar; E Atar; S Joubran; L Rath-Wolfson
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Primary and repeated perineal stapled prolapse resection.

Authors:  D Raahave; A K Jensen; L Dammegaard; I K Pedersen
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  [Operative therapy of external rectal prolapse with a stapler].

Authors:  R Scherer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  New kid on the block: perineal stapled prolapse resection (PSP) is it worthwhile in the long-term?

Authors:  Bianka Hummel; Julia Hardt; Stephan Bischofberger; Franc Hetzer; Rene Warschkow; Marcel Zadnikar; Walter Brunner; Bernhard Widmann; Bruno Schmied; Lukas Marti
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.445

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.