Literature DB >> 24770330

How to infer relative fitness from a sample of genomic sequences.

Adel Dayarian1, Boris I Shraiman2.   

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that natural populations can harbor extensive fitness diversity with numerous genomic loci under selection. It is also known that genealogical trees for populations under selection are quantifiably different from those expected under neutral evolution and described statistically by Kingman's coalescent. While differences in the statistical structure of genealogies have long been used as a test for the presence of selection, the full extent of the information that they contain has not been exploited. Here we demonstrate that the shape of the reconstructed genealogical tree for a moderately large number of random genomic samples taken from a fitness diverse, but otherwise unstructured, asexual population can be used to predict the relative fitness of individuals within the sample. To achieve this we define a heuristic algorithm, which we test in silico, using simulations of a Wright-Fisher model for a realistic range of mutation rates and selection strength. Our inferred fitness ranking is based on a linear discriminator that identifies rapidly coalescing lineages in the reconstructed tree. Inferred fitness ranking correlates strongly with actual fitness, with a genome in the top 10% ranked being in the top 20% fittest with false discovery rate of 0.1-0.3, depending on the mutation/selection parameters. The ranking also enables us to predict the genotypes that future populations inherit from the present one. While the inference accuracy increases monotonically with sample size, samples of 200 nearly saturate the performance. We propose that our approach can be used for inferring relative fitness of genomes obtained in single-cell sequencing of tumors and in monitoring viral outbreaks.
Copyright © 2014 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolution; fitness inference; genealogy; population genetics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24770330      PMCID: PMC4096370          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.160986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  43 in total

1.  The solitary wave of asexual evolution.

Authors:  Igor M Rouzine; John Wakeley; John M Coffin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effect of selection on ancestry: an exactly soluble case and its phenomenological generalization.

Authors:  E Brunet; B Derrida; A H Mueller; S Munier
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2007-10-03

3.  Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Barrick; Dong Su Yu; Sung Ho Yoon; Haeyoung Jeong; Tae Kwang Oh; Dominique Schneider; Richard E Lenski; Jihyun F Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 7.  Cancer as an evolutionary and ecological process.

Authors:  Lauren M F Merlo; John W Pepper; Brian J Reid; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Estimate of effective recombination rate and average selection coefficient for HIV in chronic infection.

Authors:  Rebecca Batorsky; Mary F Kearney; Sarah E Palmer; Frank Maldarelli; Igor M Rouzine; John M Coffin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Recombination rate and selection strength in HIV intra-patient evolution.

Authors:  Richard A Neher; Thomas Leitner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Highly-multiplexed barcode sequencing: an efficient method for parallel analysis of pooled samples.

Authors:  Andrew M Smith; Lawrence E Heisler; Robert P St Onge; Eveline Farias-Hesson; Iain M Wallace; John Bodeau; Adam N Harris; Kathleen M Perry; Guri Giaever; Nader Pourmand; Corey Nislow
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Effective models and the search for quantitative principles in microbial evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin H Good; Oskar Hallatschek
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 7.934

2.  Predicting evolution from the shape of genealogical trees.

Authors:  Richard A Neher; Colin A Russell; Boris I Shraiman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  A Metric on Phylogenetic Tree Shapes.

Authors:  C Colijn; G Plazzotta
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Predicting the short-term success of human influenza virus variants with machine learning.

Authors:  Maryam Hayati; Priscila Biller; Caroline Colijn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Genealogical structure changes as range expansions transition from pushed to pulled.

Authors:  Gabriel Birzu; Oskar Hallatschek; Kirill S Korolev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Ecological and evolutionary dynamics of multi-strain RNA viruses.

Authors:  Dennis N Makau; Samantha Lycett; Matthew Michalska-Smith; Igor A D Paploski; Maxim C-J Cheeran; Meggan E Craft; Rowland R Kao; Declan C Schroeder; Andrea Doeschl-Wilson; Kimberly VanderWaal
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 19.100

7.  Quantifying chromosomal instability from intratumoral karyotype diversity using agent-based modeling and Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Andrew R Lynch; Nicholas L Arp; Amber S Zhou; Beth A Weaver; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 8.713

8.  Joint single cell DNA-seq and RNA-seq of gastric cancer cell lines reveals rules of in vitro evolution.

Authors:  Noemi Andor; Billy T Lau; Claudia Catalanotti; Anuja Sathe; Matthew Kubit; Jiamin Chen; Cristina Blaj; Athena Cherry; Charles D Bangs; Susan M Grimes; Carlos J Suarez; Hanlee P Ji
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2020-03-14

9.  The relative fitness of the de novo variants in general Lithuanian population vs. in individuals with intellectual disability.

Authors:  Laura Pranckėnienė; Vaidutis Kučinskas
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Early prediction of antigenic transitions for influenza A/H3N2.

Authors:  Lauren A Castro; Trevor Bedford; Lauren Ancel Meyers
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.