J Jeon1, S Taneva1, V Kukreti2, P Trbovich3, A C Easty4, P G Rossos5, J A Cafazzo6. 1. Healthcare Human Factors, University Health Network, Toronto, ON. 2. Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON. ; Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. 3. HumanEra, University Health Network, Toronto, ON. ; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. ; Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. 4. HumanEra, University Health Network, Toronto, ON. ; Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. 5. Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, University Health Network, Toronto, ON. ; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. 6. Healthcare Human Factors, University Health Network, Toronto, ON. ; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. ; Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Computerized physician order entry (cpoe) systems allow for medical order management in a clinical setting. Use of a cpoe has been shown to significantly improve chemotherapy safety by reducing the number of prescribing errors. Usability of these systems has been identified as a critical factor in their successful adoption. However, there is a paucity of literature investigating the usability of cpoe for chemotherapy and describing the experiences of cancer care providers in implementing and using a cpoe system. METHODS: A mixed-methods study, including a national survey and a workshop, was conducted to determine the current status of cpoe adoption in Canadian oncology institutions, to identify and prioritize knowledge gaps in cpoe usability and adoption, and to establish a research agenda to bridge those gaps. Survey respondents were representatives of cancer care providers from each Canadian province. The workshop participants were oncology clinicians, human factors engineers, patient safety researchers, policymakers, and hospital administrators from across Canada, with participation from the United States. RESULTS: A variety of issues related to implementing and using a cpoe for chemotherapy were identified. The major issues concerned the need for better understanding of current practices of chemotherapy ordering, preparation, and administration; a lack of system selection and procurement guidance; a lack of implementation and maintenance guidance; poor cpoe usability and workflow support; and other cpoe system design issues. An additional three research themes for addressing the existing challenges and advancing successful adoption of cpoe for chemotherapy were identified: The need to investigate variances in workflows and practices in chemotherapy ordering and administrationThe need to develop best-practice cpoe procurement and implementation guidance specifically for chemotherapyThe need to measure the effects of cpoe implementation in medical oncology. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing the existing challenges in cpoe usability and adoption for chemotherapy, and accelerating successful migration to cpoe by cancer care providers requires future research focusing on workflow variations, chemotherapy-specific cpoe procurement needs, and implementation guidance needs.
BACKGROUND: Computerized physician order entry (cpoe) systems allow for medical order management in a clinical setting. Use of a cpoe has been shown to significantly improve chemotherapy safety by reducing the number of prescribing errors. Usability of these systems has been identified as a critical factor in their successful adoption. However, there is a paucity of literature investigating the usability of cpoe for chemotherapy and describing the experiences of cancer care providers in implementing and using a cpoe system. METHODS: A mixed-methods study, including a national survey and a workshop, was conducted to determine the current status of cpoe adoption in Canadian oncology institutions, to identify and prioritize knowledge gaps in cpoe usability and adoption, and to establish a research agenda to bridge those gaps. Survey respondents were representatives of cancer care providers from each Canadian province. The workshop participants were oncology clinicians, human factors engineers, patient safety researchers, policymakers, and hospital administrators from across Canada, with participation from the United States. RESULTS: A variety of issues related to implementing and using a cpoe for chemotherapy were identified. The major issues concerned the need for better understanding of current practices of chemotherapy ordering, preparation, and administration; a lack of system selection and procurement guidance; a lack of implementation and maintenance guidance; poor cpoe usability and workflow support; and other cpoe system design issues. An additional three research themes for addressing the existing challenges and advancing successful adoption of cpoe for chemotherapy were identified: The need to investigate variances in workflows and practices in chemotherapy ordering and administrationThe need to develop best-practice cpoe procurement and implementation guidance specifically for chemotherapyThe need to measure the effects of cpoe implementation in medical oncology. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing the existing challenges in cpoe usability and adoption for chemotherapy, and accelerating successful migration to cpoe by cancer care providers requires future research focusing on workflow variations, chemotherapy-specific cpoe procurement needs, and implementation guidance needs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chemotherapy; computerized physician order entry; cpoe; usability
Authors: Erika L Abramson; Vaishali Patel; Sameer Malhotra; Elizabeth R Pfoh; S Nena Osorio; Adam Cheriff; Curt L Cole; Arwen Bunce; Joan Ash; Rainu Kaushal Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2012-03-30 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: James M Hoffman; Donald K Baker; Scott C Howard; Joseph H Laver; Jerry L Shenep Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Mia A Levy; Dario A Giuse; Carol Eck; Gwen Holder; Giles Lippard; Julia Cartwright; Nancy K Rudge Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2011-06-17 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-03-09 Impact factor: 56.272