Literature DB >> 22465355

Physician experiences transitioning between an older versus newer electronic health record for electronic prescribing.

Erika L Abramson1, Vaishali Patel, Sameer Malhotra, Elizabeth R Pfoh, S Nena Osorio, Adam Cheriff, Curt L Cole, Arwen Bunce, Joan Ash, Rainu Kaushal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Federal incentives to adopt interoperable, certified electronic health records (EHRs) with electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) are motivating providers using older EHRs to transition to newer EHRs. The objective of this study was to describe, from the perspective of experienced EHR users, the transition from an older, locally developed EHR with minimal clinical decision support (CDS) for e-prescribing to a newer, commercial EHR with more robust CDS for e-prescribing.
METHODS: This qualitative, case study consisted of observations and semi-structured interviews of adult internal medicine faculty members (n=19) at an academic-affiliated ambulatory care clinic from January through November 2009. All providers transitioned from the older, locally developed EHR to the newer, commercial EHR in April 2008. We analyzed field notes of observations and transcripts of semi-structured interviews using qualitative methods guided by a grounded theory approach.
RESULTS: We identified key themes describing physician experiences. Despite intensive effort by the information systems team to ease the transition, even these experienced e-prescribers found transitioning extremely difficult. The commercial EHR was not perceived as improving medication safety, despite having more robust CDS. Additionally, physicians felt the commercial EHR was too complex, reducing their efficiency.
CONCLUSIONS: This is among the first studies examining physician experiences transitioning between an older, locally developed EHR to a newer, commercial EHR with more robust CDS for e-prescribing. Understanding physician experiences with this type of transition and their general preferences for prescribing applications may lead to less disruptive system implementations and better designed EHRs that are more readily accepted by providers. In this way, productivity and safety benefits may be maximized while mitigating potential threats associated with transitions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT00603070.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22465355     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  20 in total

Review 1.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic prescription: a systematic review of user groups' perceptions.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Édith-Romy Nsangou; Julie Payne-Gagnon; Sonya Grenier; Claude Sicotte
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  E-prescribing errors in community pharmacies: exploring consequences and contributing factors.

Authors:  Olufunmilola K Odukoya; Jamie A Stone; Michelle A Chui
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Toward successful migration to computerized physician order entry for chemotherapy.

Authors:  J Jeon; S Taneva; V Kukreti; P Trbovich; A C Easty; P G Rossos; J A Cafazzo
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Successful physician training program for large scale EMR implementation.

Authors:  J L Pantaleoni; L A Stevens; E S Mailes; B A Goad; C A Longhurst
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  The value of clinical teachers for EMR implementations and conversions.

Authors:  L A Stevens; J L Pantaleoni; C A Longhurst
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Data Quality Assessment in Emergency Medical Services: What Are the Stakeholders' Perspectives?

Authors:  Mehrnaz Mashoufi; Haleh Ayatollahi; And Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2019-01-01

7.  A long-term follow-up evaluation of electronic health record prescribing safety.

Authors:  Erika L Abramson; Sameer Malhotra; S Nena Osorio; Alison Edwards; Adam Cheriff; Curtis Cole; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future.

Authors:  R S Evans
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-05-20

9.  Migrating from One Comprehensive Commercial EHR to Another: Perceptions of Front-line Clinicians and Staff.

Authors:  Tera L Reynolds; Brian Clay; Scott E Rudkin; Sara Beckham; Danielle Perret Karimi; Joshua Glandorf; Pat Patton; Christopher Longhurst; Kai Zheng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

10.  Benefits and challenges of electronic health record system on stakeholders: a qualitative study of outpatient physicians.

Authors:  Weng Chi Chao; Hao Hu; Carolina Oi Lam Ung; Yong Cai
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 4.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.