Literature DB >> 29600180

Cap morphology after small-incision lenticule extraction and its effects on intraocular scattering.

Dan Fu1, Lin Wang1, Xing-Tao Zhou1,2, Zhi-Qiang Yu1,2.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate cap morphology after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and its effects on intraocular scattering.
METHODS: Sixty-five eyes of 33 patients undergoing SMILE were enrolled. In addition to regular evaluation, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography was used to investigate cap thickness at 1d, 1wk, 1 and 3mo postoperatively. The optical quality including modulation transfer function cutoff frequency, Strehl ratio, Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS) values, and objective scattering index (OSI), were evaluated using OQAS™.
RESULTS: Cap thickness decreased from 1d to 1wk (P<0.001), but remained higher than intended thickness of 120 µm after 3mo (P<0.001). Cap thickness in central area was thinner than that of in the paracentral and peripheral areas (P<0.0001). Total number of microdistortions decreased from 1d to 3mo (P<0.0001). Pearson analysis revealed a weak correlation between OSI and standard deviation of cap thickness at 1d and 1mo, as well as between range of cap thickness and OSI at 1mo. No correlation was found between microdistortion and OSI, but a negative correlation existed between microdistortion and range at 1d and 1moafter surgery.
CONCLUSION: The corneal cap tends to be more accurate and regular with time lapse. Better cap morphology tends to contribute less intraocular scattering in the eyes undergoing SMILE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corneal cap; intraocular scattering; microdistortion; small-incision lenticule extraction

Year:  2018        PMID: 29600180      PMCID: PMC5861236          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.03.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  30 in total

1.  Visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Kimiya Shimizu; Akihito Igarashi; Hidenaga Kobashi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 2.  Small-incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Michael V McCaughey; Dan Z Reinstein; Rupal Shah; Luis Santiago-Caban; Carlton R Fenzl
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Efficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity, and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Anders H Vestergaard; Jakob Grauslund; Anders R Ivarsen; Jesper Ø Hjortdal
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  SMILE Procedures With Four Different Cap Thicknesses for the Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.

Authors:  Jose L Güell; Paula Verdaguer; Gloria Mateu-Figueras; Daniel Elies; Oscar Gris; Mostafa A El Husseiny; Felicidad Manero; Mercè Morral
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Topographic analysis of the centration of the treatment zone after SMILE for myopia and comparison to FS-LASIK: subjective versus objective alignment.

Authors:  Apostolos Lazaridis; Konstantinos Droutsas; Walter Sekundo
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations of the Anterior Surface, Posterior Surface, and Total Cornea After SMILE, FS-LASIK, and FLEx Surgeries.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Yan Wang
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.018

7.  Accuracy and precision of cap thickness in small incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Engin Bilge Ozgurhan; Alper Agca; Ercument Bozkurt; Baran Gencer; Ugur Celik; Kadir Ilker Cankaya; Ahmet Demirok; Omer Faruk Yilmaz
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-21

8.  Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK: comparison of corneal wound healing and inflammation.

Authors:  Zixian Dong; Xingtao Zhou; Jihong Wu; Zhehuan Zhang; Tao Li; Zimei Zhou; Shenghai Zhang; Gang Li
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 9.  Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zeren Shen; Keda Shi; Yinhui Yu; Xiaoning Yu; Yuchen Lin; Ke Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of Two Cap Thickness in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: 100μm versus 160μm.

Authors:  Miao He; Wei Wang; Hui Ding; Xingwu Zhong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Agreement between subjective and predicted high and low contrast visual acuities with a double-pass system.

Authors:  Joaquín Fernández; Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo; Javier Martínez; Noemi Burguera; David P Piñero
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Evaluation of morphological features: femtosecond-LASIK flap vs. SMILE cap, and the effects on corneal higher-order aberrations.

Authors:  Xiaoying He; Qin He; Minjie Yuan; Zhi Fang; Kai Zhang; Tiepei Zhu; Wei Han
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.535

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.