Literature DB >> 24763613

Combined PET/MRI improves diagnostic accuracy in patients with prostate cancer: a prospective diagnostic trial.

Markus Hartenbach1, Sabrina Hartenbach2, Winfried Bechtloff2, Burkhardt Danz2, Klaus Kraft2, Burkhard Klemenz2, Christoph Sparwasser2, Marcus Hacker3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The pretherapeutic assessment of prostate cancer is challenging and still holds the risk of over- or undertreatment. This prospective trial investigates positron emission tomography (PET) with [(18)F]fluoroethylcholine (FEC) combined with endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of primary prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients with prostate cancer based on needle biopsy findings, scheduled for radical prostatectomy, were assessed by FEC-PET and MRI in identical positioning. After prostatectomy, imaging results were compared with histologic whole-mount sections, and the PET/MRI lesion-based semiquantitative FEC uptake was compared with biopsy Gleason scores and postoperative histology.
RESULTS: PET/MRI showed a patient-based sensitivity of 95% (36/38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 82%-99%). The analysis of 128 prostate lesions demonstrated a sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value/accuracy of 67%/35%/59%/44%/54% (P = 0.8295) for MRI and 85%/45%/68%/69%/68% (P = 0.0021) for PET, which increased to 84%/80%/85%/78%/82% (P < 0.0001) by combined FEC-PET/MRI in lesions >5 mm (n = 98). For lesions in patients with Gleason >6 tumors (n = 43), MRI and PET achieved 73%/31%/71%/33%/60% (P = 1.0000) and 90%/62%/84%/73%/81% (P = 0.0010), which were improved to 87%/92%/96%/75%/88% (P < 0.0001) by combined PET/MRI. Applying semiquantitative PET analysis, carcinomas with Gleason scores >6 were distinguished from those with Gleason ≤ 6 with a specificity of 90% and a positive predictive value of 83% (P = 0.0011; needle biopsy 71%/60%, P = 0.1071).
CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective diagnostic trial setting, combined FEC-PET/MRI achieved very high sensitivity in the detection of the dominant malignant lesion of the prostate, and markedly improved upon PET or MRI alone. Noninvasive Gleason score assessment was more precise than needle biopsy in this patient cohort. Hence, FEC-PET/MRI merits further investigation in trials of randomized, multiarm design. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24763613     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  16 in total

Review 1.  Combined PET/MRI: Multi-modality Multi-parametric Imaging Is Here: Summary Report of the 4th International Workshop on PET/MR Imaging; February 23-27, 2015, Tübingen, Germany.

Authors:  D L Bailey; B J Pichler; B Gückel; H Barthel; A J Beer; J Bremerich; J Czernin; A Drzezga; C Franzius; V Goh; M Hartenbach; H Iida; A Kjaer; C la Fougère; C N Ladefoged; I Law; K Nikolaou; H H Quick; O Sabri; J Schäfer; M Schäfers; H F Wehrl; T Beyer
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Effect of androgen deprivation therapy on intraprostatic tumour volume identified on 18F choline PET/CT for prostate dose painting radiotherapy.

Authors:  Joachim Chan; Antony Carver; John N H Brunt; Sobhan Vinjamuri; Isabel Syndikus
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Prostate cancer: combined FEC-PET/MRI improves diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Melanie Clyne
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.

Authors:  Morand Piert; Jeffrey Montgomery; Lakshmi Priya Kunju; Javed Siddiqui; Virginia Rogers; Thekkelnaycke Rajendiran; Timothy D Johnson; Xia Shao; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Comparison of 68Ga-labelled PSMA-11 and 11C-choline in the detection of prostate cancer metastases by PET/CT.

Authors:  Johannes Schwenck; Hansjoerg Rempp; Gerald Reischl; Stephan Kruck; Arnulf Stenzl; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christina Pfannenberg; Christian la Fougère
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  18F-Fluciclovine Parameters on Targeted Prostate Biopsy Associated with True Positivity in Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo; Akinyemi A Akintayo; Oladunni O Akin-Akintayo; Funmilayo I Tade; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Mark M Goodman; Baowei Fei; David M Schuster
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Magnetic resonance molecular imaging for non-invasive precision cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Zheng-Rong Lu
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-16

Review 8.  Multiparametric MRI in the PSA screening era.

Authors:  Arvin K George; Peter A Pinto; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Metabolic Volumetric Parameters in 11C-Choline PET/MR Are Superior PET Imaging Biomarkers for Primary High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jing-Ren Tseng; Lan-Yan Yang; Yu-Chun Lin; Chung-Yi Liu; See-Tong Pang; Ji-Hong Hong; Tzu-Chen Yen; Li-Jen Wang
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Molecular research in urology 2014: update on PET/MR imaging of the prostate.

Authors:  Axel Wetter
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.