Literature DB >> 24763475

Central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties after refractive femtosecond lenticule extraction.

Anders H Vestergaard, Jakob Grauslund, Anders R Ivarsen, Jesper Ø Hjortdal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties after femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEX) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-masked clinical trial of 35 patients treated for moderate to high myopia with FLEX in one eye and SMILE in the other. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography imaging (Heidelberg Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) was used to measure central corneal thickness (CCT) and epithelial, flap/cap, and residual stromal bed thickness centrally. The Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) was used to assess corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF). Patients were examined before and 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Mean decrease in CCT was 105 μm in FLEX-treated eyes and 106 μm in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .70), which is equivalent to approximately 14 μm/diopters corrected. Mean central epithelial thickness increased 7 ± 6 μm in FLEX-treated eyes and 6 ± 5 μm in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .64). Achieved mean flap/cap thickness was 4 ± 6 μm from the expected thickness in FLEX-treated eyes and 4 ± 9 μm in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .37). CH was reduced 2.7 ± 1.3 mm Hg in FLEX-treated eyes and 3.3 ± 1.2 mm Hg in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .08). CRF was reduced 4.5 ± 1.2 mm Hg in FLEX-treated eyes and 4.6 ± 1.2 mm Hg in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .71). CH and CRF were highly correlated with CCT, but not patient age.
CONCLUSIONS: In this paired-eye study, the flap-based FLEX and cap-based SMILE resulted in almost identical changes in central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties for moderate to high myopia 6 months after treatment. Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24763475     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20140120-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  10 in total

1.  Small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond lenticule extraction for myopic: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Song Wang; Hua-Tao Xie; Ye Jia; Ming-Chang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry.

Authors:  Iben Bach Pedersen; Sashia Bak-Nielsen; Anders Højslet Vestergaard; Anders Ivarsen; Jesper Hjortdal
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Efficacy, safety, predictability, aberrations and corneal biomechnical parameters after SMILE and FLEx: Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Ma; Nan-Jue Cao; Li-Kun Xia
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Yang Shen; Xiangjian Su; Xiu Liu; Huamao Miao; Xuejun Fang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Comparison of postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for high myopia: A 1-year outcome.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhu; Leilei Zou; Manrong Yu; Chen Qiu; Minjie Chen; Jinhui Dai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Visual outcomes and management after corneal refractive surgery: A review.

Authors:  Ane Murueta-Goyena; Pilar Cañadas
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-11-26

7.  Assessment of surgical outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis in patients with low compliance to postoperative follow-up: a retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital in China.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Jing Wang; Mohan Li; Xiaohu Ding; Liming Tao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Evaluation of Wide Corneal Epithelial Remodeling after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) with Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Yiming Ye; Pei Chen; Na Yu; Linxi Wan; Min Lan; Hua Zheng; Keming Yu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 9.  Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-16

10.  Comparison of Early Changes in Ocular Surface and Inflammatory Mediators between Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Hui Ding; Miao He; Lina Liu; Liangping Liu; Gang Li; Bing Niu; Xingwu Zhong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.