S J Holdsworth1, K W Yeom2, M U Antonucci2, J B Andre3, J Rosenberg2, M Aksoy2, M Straka2, N J Fischbein2, R Bammer2, M E Moseley2, G Zaharchuk2, S Skare4. 1. From the Department of Radiology (S.J.H., K.W.Y., M.U.A., J.R., M.A., M.S., N.J.F., R.B., M.E.M., G.Z.), Stanford University, Stanford, California sholdsworth@stanford.edu. 2. From the Department of Radiology (S.J.H., K.W.Y., M.U.A., J.R., M.A., M.S., N.J.F., R.B., M.E.M., G.Z.), Stanford University, Stanford, California. 3. Department of Radiology (J.B.A.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 4. Clinical Neuroscience (S.S.), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Parallel imaging facilitates the acquisition of echo-planar images with a reduced TE, enabling the incorporation of an additional image at a later TE. Here we investigated the use of a parallel imaging-enhanced dual-echo EPI sequence to improve lesion conspicuity in diffusion-weighted imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parallel imaging-enhanced dual-echo DWI data were acquired in 50 consecutive patients suspected of stroke at 1.5T. The dual-echo acquisition included 2 EPI for 1 diffusion-preparation period (echo 1 [TE = 48 ms] and echo 2 [TE = 105 ms]). Three neuroradiologists independently reviewed the 2 echoes by using the routine DWI of our institution as a reference. Images were graded on lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, and image quality. The apparent diffusion coefficient map from echo 1 was used to validate the presence of acute infarction. Relaxivity maps calculated from the 2 echoes were evaluated for potential complementary information. RESULTS: Echo 1 and 2 DWIs were rated as better than the reference DWI. While echo 1 had better image quality overall, echo 2 was unanimously favored over both echo 1 and the reference DWI for its high sensitivity in detecting acute infarcts. CONCLUSIONS: Parallel imaging-enhanced dual-echo diffusion-weighted EPI is a useful method for evaluating lesions with reduced diffusivity. The long TE of echo 2 produced DWIs that exhibited superior lesion conspicuity compared with images acquired at a shorter TE. Echo 1 provided higher SNR ADC maps for specificity to acute infarction. The relaxivity maps may serve to complement information regarding blood products and mineralization.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Parallel imaging facilitates the acquisition of echo-planar images with a reduced TE, enabling the incorporation of an additional image at a later TE. Here we investigated the use of a parallel imaging-enhanced dual-echo EPI sequence to improve lesion conspicuity in diffusion-weighted imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parallel imaging-enhanced dual-echo DWI data were acquired in 50 consecutive patients suspected of stroke at 1.5T. The dual-echo acquisition included 2 EPI for 1 diffusion-preparation period (echo 1 [TE = 48 ms] and echo 2 [TE = 105 ms]). Three neuroradiologists independently reviewed the 2 echoes by using the routine DWI of our institution as a reference. Images were graded on lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, and image quality. The apparent diffusion coefficient map from echo 1 was used to validate the presence of acute infarction. Relaxivity maps calculated from the 2 echoes were evaluated for potential complementary information. RESULTS: Echo 1 and 2 DWIs were rated as better than the reference DWI. While echo 1 had better image quality overall, echo 2 was unanimously favored over both echo 1 and the reference DWI for its high sensitivity in detecting acute infarcts. CONCLUSIONS: Parallel imaging-enhanced dual-echo diffusion-weighted EPI is a useful method for evaluating lesions with reduced diffusivity. The long TE of echo 2 produced DWIs that exhibited superior lesion conspicuity compared with images acquired at a shorter TE. Echo 1 provided higher SNR ADC maps for specificity to acute infarction. The relaxivity maps may serve to complement information regarding blood products and mineralization.
Authors: T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Stefan Skare; Rexford D Newbould; David B Clayton; Gregory W Albers; Scott Nagle; Roland Bammer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: J V Hajnal; M Doran; A S Hall; A G Collins; A Oatridge; J M Pennock; I R Young; G M Bydder Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 1991 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: A G Sorensen; F S Buonanno; R G Gonzalez; L H Schwamm; M H Lev; F R Huang-Hellinger; T G Reese; R M Weisskoff; T L Davis; N Suwanwela; U Can; J A Moreira; W A Copen; R B Look; S P Finklestein; B R Rosen; W J Koroshetz Journal: Radiology Date: 1996-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Eric K Gibbons; Patrick Le Roux; Shreyas S Vasanawala; John M Pauly; Adam B Kerr Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Kristen W Yeom; Matus Straka; Michael Iv; Michael E Moseley; Patrick D Barnes; Stefan Skare; Samantha J Holdsworth Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 3.240