Maarten De Vos1, Markus Kroesen, Reiner Emkes, Stefan Debener. 1. Methods in Neurocognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany. Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany. Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In a previous study, we presented a low-cost, small and wireless EEG system enabling the recording of single-trial P300 amplitudes in a truly mobile, outdoor walking condition (Debener et al (2012 Psychophysiology 49 1449-53)). Small and wireless mobile EEG systems have substantial practical advantages as they allow for brain activity recordings in natural environments, but these systems may compromise the EEG signal quality. In this study, we aim to evaluate the EEG signal quality that can be obtained with the mobile system. APPROACH: We compared our mobile 14-channel EEG system with a state-of-the-art wired laboratory EEG system in a popular brain-computer interface (BCI) application. N = 13 individuals repeatedly performed a 6 × 6 matrix P300 spelling task. Between conditions, only the amplifier was changed, while electrode placement and electrode preparation, recording conditions, experimental stimulation and signal processing were identical. MAIN RESULTS: Analysis of training and testing accuracies and information transfer rate (ITR) revealed that the wireless mobile EEG amplifier performed as good as the wired laboratory EEG system. A very high correlation for testing ITR between both amplifiers was evident (r = 0.92). Moreover the P300 topographies and amplitudes were very similar for both devices, as reflected by high degrees of association (r > = 0.77). SIGNIFICANCE: We conclude that efficient P300 spelling with a small, lightweight and quick to set up mobile EEG amplifier is possible. This technology facilitates the transfer of BCI applications from the laboratory to natural daily life environments, one of the key challenges in current BCI research.
OBJECTIVE: In a previous study, we presented a low-cost, small and wireless EEG system enabling the recording of single-trial P300 amplitudes in a truly mobile, outdoor walking condition (Debener et al (2012 Psychophysiology 49 1449-53)). Small and wireless mobile EEG systems have substantial practical advantages as they allow for brain activity recordings in natural environments, but these systems may compromise the EEG signal quality. In this study, we aim to evaluate the EEG signal quality that can be obtained with the mobile system. APPROACH: We compared our mobile 14-channel EEG system with a state-of-the-art wired laboratory EEG system in a popular brain-computer interface (BCI) application. N = 13 individuals repeatedly performed a 6 × 6 matrix P300 spelling task. Between conditions, only the amplifier was changed, while electrode placement and electrode preparation, recording conditions, experimental stimulation and signal processing were identical. MAIN RESULTS: Analysis of training and testing accuracies and information transfer rate (ITR) revealed that the wireless mobile EEG amplifier performed as good as the wired laboratory EEG system. A very high correlation for testing ITR between both amplifiers was evident (r = 0.92). Moreover the P300 topographies and amplitudes were very similar for both devices, as reflected by high degrees of association (r > = 0.77). SIGNIFICANCE: We conclude that efficient P300 spelling with a small, lightweight and quick to set up mobile EEG amplifier is possible. This technology facilitates the transfer of BCI applications from the laboratory to natural daily life environments, one of the key challenges in current BCI research.
Authors: Selene Petit; Nicholas A Badcock; Tijl Grootswagers; Anina N Rich; Jon Brock; Lyndsey Nickels; Denise Moerel; Nadene Dermody; Shu Yau; Elaine Schmidt; Alexandra Woolgar Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Nicholas A Badcock; Kathryn A Preece; Bianca de Wit; Katharine Glenn; Nora Fieder; Johnson Thie; Genevieve McArthur Journal: PeerJ Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Anne-Marie Brouwer; Thorsten O Zander; Jan B F van Erp; Johannes E Korteling; Adelbert W Bronkhorst Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Martin G Bleichner; Micha Lundbeck; Matthias Selisky; Falk Minow; Manuela Jäger; Reiner Emkes; Stefan Debener; Maarten De Vos Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2015-04