Literature DB >> 32640176

Toward an Individualized Neural Assessment of Receptive Language in Children.

Selene Petit1,2, Nicholas A Badcock1,2,3, Tijl Grootswagers1,2,4, Anina N Rich1,2, Jon Brock2, Lyndsey Nickels2, Denise Moerel1,2, Nadene Dermody1,5, Shu Yau6,7, Elaine Schmidt8,9, Alexandra Woolgar1,2,9.   

Abstract

Purpose We aimed to develop a noninvasive neural test of language comprehension to use with nonspeaking children for whom standard behavioral testing is unreliable (e.g., minimally verbal autism). Our aims were threefold. First, we sought to establish the sensitivity of two auditory paradigms to elicit neural responses in individual neurotypical children. Second, we aimed to validate the use of a portable and accessible electroencephalography (EEG) system, by comparing its recordings to those of a research-grade system. Third, in light of substantial interindividual variability in individuals' neural responses, we assessed whether multivariate decoding methods could improve sensitivity. Method We tested the sensitivity of two child-friendly covert N400 paradigms. Thirty-one typically developing children listened to identical spoken words that were either strongly predicted by the preceding context or violated lexical-semantic expectations. Context was given by a cue word (Experiment 1) or sentence frame (Experiment 2), and participants either made an overall judgment on word relatedness or counted lexical-semantic violations. We measured EEG concurrently from a research-grade system, Neuroscan's SynAmps2, and an adapted gaming system, Emotiv's EPOC+. Results We found substantial interindividual variability in the timing and topology of N400-like effects. For both paradigms and EEG systems, traditional N400 effects at the expected sensors and time points were statistically significant in around 50% of individuals. Using multivariate analyses, detection rate increased to 88% of individuals for the research-grade system in the sentences paradigm, illustrating the robustness of this method in the face of interindividual variations in topography. Conclusions There was large interindividual variability in neural responses, suggesting interindividual variation in either the cognitive response to lexical-semantic violations and/or the neural substrate of that response. Around half of our neurotypical participants showed the expected N400 effect at the expected location and time points. A low-cost, accessible EEG system provided comparable data for univariate analysis but was not well suited to multivariate decoding. However, multivariate analyses with a research-grade EEG system increased our detection rate to 88% of individuals. This approach provides a strong foundation to establish a neural index of language comprehension in children with limited communication. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12606311.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32640176      PMCID: PMC7116229          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  61 in total

1.  A Rett patient with a typical Angelman EEG.

Authors:  Laura A E M Laan; A A Vein
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.864

2.  Cloze probability and completion norms for 498 sentences: behavioral and neural validation using event-related potentials.

Authors:  Cady K Block; Carryl L Baldwin
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-08

3.  Which People with Specific Language Impairment have Auditory Processing Deficits?

Authors:  G M McArthur; D V M Bishop
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Dissimilar age influences on two ERP waveforms (LPC and N400) reflecting semantic context effect.

Authors:  K Juottonen; A Revonsuo; H Lang
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1996-09

5.  Electrophysiological assessment of language function following stroke.

Authors:  Ryan C N D'Arcy; Yannick Marchand; Gail A Eskes; Edmund R Harrison; Stephen J Phillips; Alma Major; John F Connolly
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  The N400 as a function of the level of processing.

Authors:  D J Chwilla; C M Brown; P Hagoort
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  N400-like semantic incongruity effect in 19-month-olds: processing known words in picture contexts.

Authors:  Manuela Friedrich; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP).

Authors:  Marta Kutas; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 9.  User's guide to correlation coefficients.

Authors:  Haldun Akoglu
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-08-07

10.  Implicit Measures of Receptive Vocabulary Knowledge in Individuals With Level 3 Autism.

Authors:  Emily L Coderre; Mariya Chernenok; Jessica O'Grady; Laura Bosley; Barry Gordon; Kerry Ledoux
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.600

View more
  2 in total

1.  Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation.

Authors:  Lydia Barnes; Selene Petit; Nicholas A Badcock; Christopher J Whyte; Alexandra Woolgar
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 2.  When Is Simultaneous Recording Necessary? A Guide for Researchers Considering Combined EEG-fMRI.

Authors:  Catriona L Scrivener
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.