Literature DB >> 30639330

Reducing power line noise in EEG and MEG data via spectrum interpolation.

Sabine Leske1, Sarang S Dalal2.   

Abstract

Electroencephalographic (EEG) and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) signals can often be exposed to strong power line interference at 50 or 60 Hz. A widely used method to remove line noise is the notch filter, but it comes with the risk of potentially severe signal distortions. Among other approaches, the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) filter and CleanLine have been developed as alternatives, but they may fail to remove power line noise of highly fluctuating amplitude. Here we introduce spectrum interpolation as a new method to remove line noise in the EEG and MEG signal. This approach had been developed for electromyographic (EMG) signals, and combines the advantages of a notch filter, while synthetic test signals indicate that it introduces less distortion in the time domain. The effectiveness of this method is compared to CleanLine, the notch (Butterworth) and DFT filter. In order to quantify the performance of these three methods, we used synthetic test signals and simulated power line noise with fluctuating amplitude and abrupt on- and offsets that were added to an MEG dataset free of line noise. In addition, all methods were applied to EEG data with massive power line noise due to acquisition in unshielded settings. We show that spectrum interpolation outperforms the DFT filter and CleanLine, when power line noise is nonstationary. At the same time, spectrum interpolation performs equally well as the notch filter in removing line noise artifacts, but shows less distortions in the time domain in many common situations.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifact removal; Gibbs effect; Notch filter; Power line noise; Ringing; Spectrum interpolation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30639330      PMCID: PMC6456018          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  19 in total

1.  Systematic biases in early ERP and ERF components as a result of high-pass filtering.

Authors:  David J Acunzo; Graham Mackenzie; Mark C W van Rossum
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  P300 speller BCI with a mobile EEG system: comparison to a traditional amplifier.

Authors:  Maarten De Vos; Markus Kroesen; Reiner Emkes; Stefan Debener
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components.

Authors:  T W Picton; S A Hillyard; H I Krausz; R Galambos
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-02

4.  Context-aware brain-computer interfaces: exploring the information space of user, technical system and environment.

Authors:  T O Zander; S Jatzev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  fMRI artefact rejection and sleep scoring toolbox.

Authors:  Yves Leclercq; Jessica Schrouff; Quentin Noirhomme; Pierre Maquet; Christophe Phillips
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-13

6.  Four common conceptual fallacies in mapping the time course of recognition.

Authors:  Rufin Vanrullen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-07

7.  Filter effects and filter artifacts in the analysis of electrophysiological data.

Authors:  Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-09

8.  Does Filtering Preclude Us from Studying ERP Time-Courses?

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-05-04

9.  The PREP pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis.

Authors:  Nima Bigdely-Shamlo; Tim Mullen; Christian Kothe; Kyung-Min Su; Kay A Robbins
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 4.081

10.  Detection of Near-Threshold Sounds is Independent of EEG Phase in Common Frequency Bands.

Authors:  Benedikt Zoefel; Peter Heil
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-14
View more
  14 in total

1.  Causal Evidence for a Role of Cerebellar Lobulus Simplex in Prefrontal-Hippocampal Interaction in Spatial Working Memory Decision-Making.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Samuel S McAfee; Meike E Van Der Heijden; Mukesh Dhamala; Roy V Sillitoe; Detlef H Heck
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.648

Review 2.  Principles and open questions in functional brain network reconstruction.

Authors:  Onerva Korhonen; Massimiliano Zanin; David Papo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Zapline-plus: A Zapline extension for automatic and adaptive removal of frequency-specific noise artifacts in M/EEG.

Authors:  Marius Klug; Niels A Kloosterman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 5.399

4.  The Application of EEG Mu Rhythm Measures to Neurophysiological Research in Stuttering.

Authors:  David Jenson; Andrew L Bowers; Daniel Hudock; Tim Saltuklaroglu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  Multimodal signal dataset for 11 intuitive movement tasks from single upper extremity during multiple recording sessions.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Jeong; Jeong-Hyun Cho; Kyung-Hwan Shim; Byoung-Hee Kwon; Byeong-Hoo Lee; Do-Yeun Lee; Dae-Hyeok Lee; Seong-Whan Lee
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 6.524

6.  Electrical Brain Activity and Its Functional Connectivity in the Physical Execution of Modern Jazz Dance.

Authors:  Johanna Wind; Fabian Horst; Nikolas Rizzi; Alexander John; Wolfgang I Schöllhorn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-15

7.  Using OPMs to measure neural activity in standing, mobile participants.

Authors:  Robert A Seymour; Nicholas Alexander; Stephanie Mellor; George C O'Neill; Tim M Tierney; Gareth R Barnes; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The significance of neural inter-frequency power correlations.

Authors:  Oscar W Savolainen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Interference suppression techniques for OPM-based MEG: Opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Robert A Seymour; Nicholas Alexander; Stephanie Mellor; George C O'Neill; Tim M Tierney; Gareth R Barnes; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Source imaging of high-density visual evoked potentials with multi-scale brain parcellations and connectomes.

Authors:  David Pascucci; Sebastien Tourbier; Joan Rué-Queralt; Margherita Carboni; Patric Hagmann; Gijs Plomp
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 8.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.