Literature DB >> 24762143

Geriatric fractures about the hip: divergent patterns in the proximal femur, acetabulum, and pelvis.

Matthew P Sullivan, Keith D Baldwin, Derek J Donegan, Samir Mehta, Jaimo Ahn.   

Abstract

Geriatric acetabular, pelvis, and subtrochanteric femur fractures are poorly understood and rapidly growing clinical problems. The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiologic trends of these injuries as compared with traditional fragility fractures about the hip. From 1993 to 2010, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) recorded more than 600 million Medicare-paid hospital discharges. This retrospective study used the NIS to compare patients with acetabular fractures (n=87,771), pelvic fractures (n=522,831), and subtrochanteric fractures (n=170,872) with patients with traditional hip fractures (intertrochanteric and femoral neck, n=3,495,742) with regard to annual trends over an 18-year period in incidence, length of hospital stay, hospital mortality, transfers from acute care institutions, and hospital charges. Traditional hip fractures peaked in 1996 and declined by 25.7% by 2010. During the same 18-year period, geriatric acetabular fractures increased by 67%, subtrochanteric femur fractures increased by 42%, and pelvic fractures increased by 24%. Hospital charges, when controlling for inflation, increased roughly 50% for all fracture types. Furthermore, transfers from outside acute care hospitals for definitive management stayed elevated for acetabular fractures as compared with traditional hip fractures, suggesting a greater need for tertiary care of acetabular fractures. Geriatric acetabular fractures are rapidly increasing, whereas traditional hip fractures continue to decline. Patients with these injuries are more likely to be transferred from their hospital of presentation to another acute care institution, possibly increasing costs and complications. This is likely related to their complexity and the lack of consensus regarding optimal management. Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24762143     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20140225-50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  23 in total

1.  Implementation of a standardized protocol to manage elderly patients with low energy pelvic fractures: can service improvement be expected?

Authors:  Nikolaos K Kanakaris; Tess Greven; Robert M West; Arie B Van Vugt; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  CORR Insights(®): Variation in Resource Utilization for Patients With Hip and Pelvic Fractures Despite Equal Medicare Reimbursement.

Authors:  Lisa K Cannada
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Osteoporotic Pelvic Fractures.

Authors:  Ludwig Oberkircher; Steffen Ruchholtz; Pol Maria Rommens; Alexander Hofmann; Benjamin Bücking; Antonio Krüger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Biomechanical comparison of screw vs. cerclage refixation in orthogeriatric lesser trochanteric fractures: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Christoph Linhart; Manuel Kistler; Matthias Woiczinski; Rouven Neudeck; Matthias Kassube; Wolfgang Böcker; Christian Ehrnthaller
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Focusing on individual morphological fracture characteristics of pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients can support clinical decision making.

Authors:  Franziska Saxer; Henrik Eckardt; Michaela Ramser; Dieter Cadosch; Werner Vach; Nathalie Strub
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.070

6.  Demographic changes in pelvic fracture patterns at a Swiss academic trauma center from 2007 to 2017.

Authors:  Karin Villiger; Malin Kristin Meier; Rebecca Maria Hasler; Johannes Dominik Bastian; Moritz Tannast; Aristomenis Konstantinos Exadaktylos; Simon Damian Steppacher
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.697

7.  [Trends in the surgical treatment of fractures of the pelvic ring : A nationwide analysis of operations and procedures code (OPS) data between 2005 and 2017].

Authors:  Moritz F Lodde; J Christoph Katthagen; Oliver Riesenbeck; Michael J Raschke; René Hartensuer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 8.  Drug-based pain management for people with dementia after hip or pelvic fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kai Moschinski; Silke Kuske; Silke Andrich; Astrid Stephan; Irmela Gnass; Erika Sirsch; Andrea Icks
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Does surgical treatment for unstable fragility fracture of the pelvis promote early mobilization and improve survival rate and postoperative clinical function?

Authors:  Yuki Saito; Katsuhiro Tokutake; Yasuhiko Takegami; Masahiro Yoshida; Toshifumi Omichi; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Epidemiology of Pelvic Fractures in Germany: Considerably High Incidence Rates among Older People.

Authors:  Silke Andrich; Burkhard Haastert; Elke Neuhaus; Kathrin Neidert; Werner Arend; Christian Ohmann; Jürgen Grebe; Andreas Vogt; Pascal Jungbluth; Grit Rösler; Joachim Windolf; Andrea Icks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.