Literature DB >> 33030568

[Trends in the surgical treatment of fractures of the pelvic ring : A nationwide analysis of operations and procedures code (OPS) data between 2005 and 2017].

Moritz F Lodde1, J Christoph Katthagen2, Oliver Riesenbeck2, Michael J Raschke2, René Hartensuer2.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiological trends and incidences in inpatient pelvic surgery in the period from 2005 to 2007.
METHOD: Approximately 194 million anonymized diagnosis-related groups (DRG) inpatient records were collected by the German Federal Statistical Office between 2005 and 2017. These data were screened for pelvic procedures, gender and age of the patients. Statistical testing was performed using the χ2-test and Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2017 the number of closed reduction and internal fixation of the pelvic ring with screw fixation increased by +1116%. The use of screw fixation for closed reduction and internal fixation of the sacroiliac joint increased by +800%. The number of cases of open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the pelvic ring and pelvic rim increased by +185% and reposition with external fixator increased by +188%. In 2005 more surgical procedures were undertaken in male inpatients, whereas more surgical procedures were undertaken in female inpatients in 2017. In general, a large increase in the number of pelvic procedures was observed in the group of patients >50 years old.
CONCLUSION: There was an increase in the number of all analyzed pelvic procedures between 2005 and 2017. Especially the use of screw fixation increased. The introduction of new techniques (e.g. screw fixation of the sacroiliac joint) and progress and innovation in the field of three-dimensional navigation techniques, the demographic trend, greater mobility and higher demands on functionality of older patients might explain this increase in pelvic procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Demographic change; External fixator; Pelvic fracture; Sacroiliac-screw; Surgical medical care situation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33030568     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-020-00893-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  27 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review.

Authors:  Charles M Court-Brown; Ben Caesar
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  [Operative treatment in orthopedics and trauma surgery : Are more operations carried out in Germany?]

Authors:  P Garcia; C Domnick; G Lodde; M J Raschke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Biomechanical comparison of augmented versus non-augmented sacroiliac screws in a novel hemi-pelvis test model.

Authors:  Niklas Grüneweller; Michael J Raschke; Ivan Zderic; Daniel Widmer; Dirk Wähnert; Boyko Gueorguiev; Robert Geoff Richards; Thomas Fuchs; Markus Windolf
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Outcome analysis of unstable posterior ring injury of the pelvis: comparison between percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation and conservative treatment.

Authors:  Po-Han Chen; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Yen-Yao Li; Tsan-Wen Huang; Tsung-Jen Huang; Kuo-Ti Peng
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.910

5.  Trends and incidences of ligament-surgeries and osteotomies of the knee: an analysis of German inpatient records 2005-2013.

Authors:  Christoph Domnick; Patric Garcia; Michael J Raschke; Johannes Glasbrenner; Georg Lodde; Christian Fink; Mirco Herbort
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  [Current treatment of pelvic ring fractures].

Authors:  U Culemann; H J Oestern; T Pohlemann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Outcome of osteoporotic pelvic fractures: an underestimated severity. Survey of 60 cases.

Authors:  Véronique Breuil; Christian Hubert Roux; Jean Testa; Christine Albert; Madleen Chassang; Olivier Brocq; Liana Euller-Ziegler
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  A Nationwide Analysis of Pelvic Ring Fractures: Incidence and Trends in Treatment, Length of Stay, and Mortality.

Authors:  Leonard T Buller; Matthew J Best; Stephen M Quinnan
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2016-03

10.  Sacral insufficiency fractures: a case of mistaken identity.

Authors:  Mathew J Baldwin; Laura J Tucker
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2014-05-30
View more
  3 in total

1.  Design and evaluation of an intelligent reduction robot system for the minimally invasive reduction in pelvic fractures.

Authors:  Chunpeng Zhao; Yu Wang; Xinbao Wu; Gang Zhu; Shuchang Shi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  Biomechanical Comparison of Five Fixation Techniques for Unstable Fragility Fractures of the Pelvic Ring.

Authors:  Moritz F Lodde; J Christoph Katthagen; Clemens O Schopper; Ivan Zderic; Geoff Richards; Boyko Gueorguiev; Michael J Raschke; René Hartensuer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Does Cement Augmentation of the Sacroiliac Screw Lead to Superior Biomechanical Results for Fixation of the Posterior Pelvic Ring? A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Moritz F Lodde; J Christoph Katthagen; Clemens O Schopper; Ivan Zderic; R Geoff Richards; Boyko Gueorguiev; Michael J Raschke; René Hartensuer
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.