Literature DB >> 17703607

A code of ethics for the life sciences.

Nancy L Jones1.   

Abstract

The activities of the life sciences are essential to provide solutions for the future, for both individuals and society. Society has demanded growing accountability from the scientific community as implications of life science research rise in influence and there are concerns about the credibility, integrity and motives of science. While the scientific community has responded to concerns about its integrity in part by initiating training in research integrity and the responsible conduct of research, this approach is minimal. The scientific community justifies itself by appealing to the ethos of science, claiming academic freedom, self-direction, and self-regulation, but no comprehensive codification of this foundational ethos has been forthcoming. A review of the professional norms of science and a prototype code of ethics for the life sciences provide a framework to spur discussions within the scientific community to define scientific professionalism. A formalization of implicit principles can provide guidance for recognizing divergence from the norms, place these norms within a context that would enhance education of trainees, and provide a framework for discussing externally and internally applied pressures that are influencing the practice of science. The prototype code articulates the goal for life sciences research and the responsibilities associated with the freedom of exploration, the principles for the practice of science, and the virtues of the scientists themselves. The time is ripe for scientific communities to reinvigorate professionalism and define the basis of their social contract. Codifying the basis of the social contract between science and society will sustain public trust in the scientific enterprise.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17703607     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-006-0007-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  12 in total

1.  Normative orientations of university faculty and doctoral students.

Authors:  M S Anderson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Scientific societies as sentinels of responsible research conduct.

Authors:  M S Frankel
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  2000-09

3.  Science ethics: a study of eminent scientists' professional values.

Authors:  Katarina Prpić
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.238

4.  The social responsibilities of biological scientists.

Authors:  Stanley Joel Reiser; Ruth Ellen Bulger
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  The role of scientific societies in promoting research integrity.

Authors:  Mark S Frankel; Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Ethics: a weapon to counter bioterrorism.

Authors:  Margaret A Somerville; Ronald M Atlas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.

Authors:  N S Wenger; S G Korenman; R Berk; S Berry
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  The code of the scientist and its relationship to ethics.

Authors:  A Cournand
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Ethics in research: current issues for dental researchers and their professional society.

Authors:  M S Frankel
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.116

10.  Evaluation of the research norms of scientists and administrators responsible for academic research integrity.

Authors:  S G Korenman; R Berk; N S Wenger; V Lew
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  14 in total

1.  Hype and public trust in science.

Authors:  Zubin Master; David B Resnik
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Utilitarianism and the evolution of ecological ethics.

Authors:  Gary Varner
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Mental models: an alternative evaluation of a sensemaking approach to ethics instruction.

Authors:  Meagan E Brock; Andrew Vert; Vykinta Kligyte; Ethan P Waples; Sydney T Sevier; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Variations in Scientific Data Production: What Can We Learn from #Overlyhonestmethods?

Authors:  Louise Bezuidenhout
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Scientific Ethics: A New Approach.

Authors:  Marcello Menapace
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  A room with a view of integrity and professionalism: personal reflections on teaching responsible conduct of research in the neurosciences.

Authors:  Emily Bell
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Developing a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum for professionalism and scientific integrity training for biomedical graduate students.

Authors:  Nancy L Jones; Ann M Peiffer; Ann Lambros; Martin Guthold; A Daniel Johnson; Michael Tytell; April E Ronca; J Charles Eldridge
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Moving life science ethics debates beyond national borders: some empirical observations.

Authors:  Louise Bezuidenhout
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Ethical issues in engineering models: an operations researcher's reflections.

Authors:  J Kleijnen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  On genies and bottles: scientists' moral responsibility and dangerous technology R&D.

Authors:  David Koepsell
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.