BACKGROUND: Patients with newly diagnosed HIV may be part of social networks with elevated prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection. Social network recruitment by persons with newly diagnosed HIV may efficiently identify undiagnosed cases of HIV infection. We assessed social network recruitment as a strategy for identifying undiagnosed cases of HIV infection. METHODS: In a sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi, 3 groups of 45 "seeds" were enrolled: STI patients with newly diagnosed HIV, STI patients who were HIV-uninfected, and community controls. Seeds were asked to recruit up to 5 social "contacts" (sexual or nonsexual). Mean number of contacts recruited per group was calculated. HIV prevalence ratios (PRs) and number of contacts needed to test to identify 1 new case of HIV were compared between groups using generalized estimating equations with exchangeable correlation matrices. RESULTS: Mean number of contacts recruited was 1.3 for HIV-infected clinic seeds, 1.8 for HIV-uninfected clinic seeds, and 2.3 for community seeds. Contacts of HIV-infected clinic seeds had a higher HIV prevalence (PR: 3.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 7.8) than contacts of community seeds, but contacts of HIV-uninfected clinic seeds did not (PR: 1.1, 95% confidence interval: 0.4 to 3.3). Results were similar when restricted to nonsexual contacts. To identify 1 new case of HIV, it was necessary to test 8 contacts of HIV-infected clinic seeds, 10 contacts of HIV-uninfected clinic seeds, and 18 contacts of community seeds. CONCLUSIONS: Social contact recruitment by newly diagnosed STI patients efficiently led to new HIV diagnoses. Research to replicate findings and guide implementation is needed.
BACKGROUND:Patients with newly diagnosed HIV may be part of social networks with elevated prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection. Social network recruitment by persons with newly diagnosed HIV may efficiently identify undiagnosed cases of HIV infection. We assessed social network recruitment as a strategy for identifying undiagnosed cases of HIV infection. METHODS: In a sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi, 3 groups of 45 "seeds" were enrolled: STI patients with newly diagnosed HIV, STI patients who were HIV-uninfected, and community controls. Seeds were asked to recruit up to 5 social "contacts" (sexual or nonsexual). Mean number of contacts recruited per group was calculated. HIV prevalence ratios (PRs) and number of contacts needed to test to identify 1 new case of HIV were compared between groups using generalized estimating equations with exchangeable correlation matrices. RESULTS: Mean number of contacts recruited was 1.3 for HIV-infected clinic seeds, 1.8 for HIV-uninfected clinic seeds, and 2.3 for community seeds. Contacts of HIV-infected clinic seeds had a higher HIV prevalence (PR: 3.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 7.8) than contacts of community seeds, but contacts of HIV-uninfected clinic seeds did not (PR: 1.1, 95% confidence interval: 0.4 to 3.3). Results were similar when restricted to nonsexual contacts. To identify 1 new case of HIV, it was necessary to test 8 contacts of HIV-infected clinic seeds, 10 contacts of HIV-uninfected clinic seeds, and 18 contacts of community seeds. CONCLUSIONS: Social contact recruitment by newly diagnosed STI patients efficiently led to new HIV diagnoses. Research to replicate findings and guide implementation is needed.
Authors: Gregorio A Millett; John L Peterson; Stephen A Flores; Trevor A Hart; William L Jeffries; Patrick A Wilson; Sean B Rourke; Charles M Heilig; Jonathan Elford; Kevin A Fenton; Robert S Remis Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lillian B Brown; William C Miller; Gift Kamanga; Naomi Nyirenda; Pearson Mmodzi; Audrey Pettifor; Rosalie C Dominik; Jay S Kaufman; Clement Mapanje; Francis Martinson; Myron S Cohen; Irving F Hoffman Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Ann M Dennis; Wendy Murillo; Flor de Maria Hernandez; Maria Elena Guardado; Ana Isabel Nieto; Ivette Lorenzana de Rivera; Joseph J Eron; Gabriela Paz-Bailey Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Nora E Rosenberg; Audrey E Pettifor; Guy De Bruyn; Daniel Westreich; Sinead Delany-Moretlwe; Frieda Behets; Suzanne Maman; David Coetzee; Mercy Kamupira; William C Miller Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Nora E Rosenberg; Christopher C Stanley; Sarah E Rutstein; Naomi Bonongwe; Gift Kamanga; Audrey Pettifor; Clement Mapanje; Francis Martinson; Irving F Hoffman; William C Miller Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Jerry O Jacobson; Carmen Cueto; Jennifer L Smith; Jimee Hwang; Roly Gosling; Adam Bennett Journal: Malar J Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Tiffany A Lillie; Navindra E Persaud; Meghan C DiCarlo; Dismas Gashobotse; Didier R Kamali; Magda Cheron; Lirica Nishimoto; Christopher Akolo; Hally R Mahler; Maria C Au; R Cameron Wolf Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kevin Theunissen; Christian Hoebe; Gerjo Kok; Rik Crutzen; Chakib Kara-Zaïtri; Nanne de Vries; Jan van Bergen; Robert Hamilton; Marianne van der Sande; Nicole Dukers-Muijrers Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.390