Literature DB >> 24757357

Implant retained auricular prosthesis with a modified hader bar: a case report.

M Lovely1, Pradeep C Dathan2, Dinesh Gopal3, Biji Thomas George4, K Chandrasekharan Nair5.   

Abstract

Auricular prostheses for defects of external ear are retained either by mechanical means or implants. All implant retained prostheses are retained by various means such as bar and clip, magnetic attachments or a combination of bar, clip and magnets. The commonest problem encountered with the bar and clip system is loosening of the clip after 3-4 months. When magnets are used as retaining component they tend to corrode over a period of time. So various alternative retention methods which possess good retentive qualities, ease of reparability and patient friendly were tried. In the present case a newly modified Hader bar design which can act as an additional retentive feature apart from the clip is employed to increase retention. The major advantages in the modified Hader bar system were that only two implants were employed, the additional loops in the Hader bar prevented micro movements and the retentive acrylic locks were easy to repair if broken. The modified Hader bar has anti-rotational slots which prevents the sliding or rotation of the prosthesis which gave new confidence to the patient who was otherwise worried of inadvertent displacement of the ear prosthesis while playing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auricular prostheses; Craniofacial implants; Modified Hader bar design

Year:  2013        PMID: 24757357      PMCID: PMC3990766          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-013-0277-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  10 in total

1.  Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients.

Authors:  Daniel Buser; Sigurgísli Ingimarsson; Karl Dula; Adrian Lussi; Hans Peter Hirt; Urs C Belser
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Magnet-retained auricular prosthesis with an implant-supported composite bar: a clinical report.

Authors:  Robin W C Chung; Adam S C Siu; Frederick C S Chu; Tak W Chow
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Magnetic retention and bar-clip attachment for implant-retained auricular prostheses: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Andréa Alves de Sousa; Beatriz Silva Câmara Mattos
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

4.  Modified bar superstructure for an implant-retained orbital prosthesis.

Authors:  Z Khan; M Bowden; D Beam
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Use of a surgical positioner for bone-anchored facial prostheses.

Authors:  D J Reisberg; S W Habakuk
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems.

Authors:  A G Payne; Y F Solomons
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period.

Authors:  P I Brånemark; B O Hansson; R Adell; U Breine; J Lindström; O Hallén; A Ohman
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl       Date:  1977

Review 8.  Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review.

Authors:  Theodoros Trakas; Konstantinos Michalakis; Kiho Kang; Hiroshi Hirayama
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.454

9.  Retention designs for bone-anchored facial prostheses.

Authors:  J J Gary; M Donovan
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: one-year results.

Authors:  R H Batenburg; H J Meijer; G M Raghoebar; R P Van Oort; G Boering
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.977

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  A different wax sculpture technique for implant-retained auricular prosthesis.

Authors:  Necla Demir; Pınar Cevik; Yener Okutan; A Nilgun Ozturk; Bahar Colpan
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.