Literature DB >> 24756537

Novel single-loop and double-loop knot stitch in comparison with the modified Mason-Allen stitch for rotator cuff repair.

Stephan Frosch1, Gottfried Buchhorn, Anja Hoffmann, Peter Balcarek, Jan Philipp Schüttrumpf, Florian August, Klaus Michael Stürmer, Hans Joachim Walde, Tim Alexander Walde.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In rotator cuff repair, strong and long-lasting suturing techniques that do not require additional implants are needed. This study examines the ultimate load to failure and the Young's modulus at the suture-tendon interface for a novel single-loop knot stitch and double-loop knot stitch. These values are compared to those of the modified Mason-Allen stitch.
METHODS: Twenty-four infraspinatus muscles with tendons were dissected from porcine shoulders (twelve Goettingen minipigs). The preparations were randomly allocated to three groups of eight samples. Load-to-failure testing of the single-loop knot stitch, the double-loop knot stitch and the mMAS were performed using a Zwick 1446 universal testing machine (Zwick-Roell AG, Ulm, Germany).
RESULTS: The highest ultimate load to failure for the three techniques occurred with the double-loop knot stitch with a median value of 382.2 N (range 291.8-454.2 N). These values were significantly higher than those of the single-loop knot stitch, which had a median value of 259.5 N (range 139.6-366.3 N) and the modified Mason-Allen stitch, which had a median value of 309.3 N (range 84.55-382.9 N). The values of the single-loop knot stitch and the modified Mason-Allen stitch did not differ significantly. Regarding the Young's modulus, no significant differences were found between the double-loop knot stitch with a median value of 496.02 N/mm² (range 400.4-572.6 N/mm²) and the modified Mason-Allen stitch with 498.5 N/mm² (range 375.5-749.2 N/mm²) with respect to the stiffness of the suture-tendon complex. The median value for the Young's modulus of the single-loop knot stitch of 392.1 N/mm² (range 285.7-510.6 N/mm²) was significantly lower than those of the double-loop knot stitch and modified Mason-Allen stitch.
CONCLUSION: This in vitro animal study demonstrated that both the single-loop knot stitch and the double-loop knot stitch have excellent ultimate load-to-failure properties when used for rotator cuff repair. The introduced single-loop knot stitch and double-loop knot stitch offer an alternative to other common used stitch techniques in rotator cuff repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24756537     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2976-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  35 in total

1.  Muscle sizes and moment arms of rotator cuff muscles determined by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  B Juul-Kristensen; F Bojsen-Moller; L Finsen; J Eriksson; G Johansson; F Stâhlberg; C Ekdahl
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.481

2.  The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Leesa M Galatz; Craig M Ball; Sharlene A Teefey; William D Middleton; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of rotator cuff repairs in a sheep model: suture anchors using arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches compared with transosseous sutures using traditional modified Mason-Allen stitches.

Authors:  Hans-Michael Klinger; Gottfried H Buchhorn; Gabert Heidrich; Enrico Kahl; Mike H Baums
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 4.  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations.

Authors:  Brian J Cole; Neal S ElAttrache; Ammar Anbari
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  Clinical evidence shows no difference between single- and double-row repair for rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Daniel J Reardon; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable screws: An in vivo and ex vivo investigation.

Authors:  Craig A Cummins; Sabrina Strickland; Richard C Appleyard; Zoltan L Szomor; Jeanette Marshall; George A C Murrell
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Tendon-healing to cortical bone compared with healing to a cancellous trough. A biomechanical and histological evaluation in goats.

Authors:  P St Pierre; E J Olson; J J Elliott; K C O'Hair; L A McKinney; J Ryan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  [Tensile strength of the tendon of the supraspinatus muscle in the human. A biomechanical study].

Authors:  M Rickert; H Georgousis; U Witzel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  D F Gazielly; P Gleyze; C Montagnon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Robert T Burks; Julia Crim; Nick Brown; Barbara Fink; Patrick E Greis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  2 in total

1.  The primary factor for suture configuration at rotator cuff repair: Width of mattress or distance from tear edge.

Authors:  Onur Hapa; Ahmet Karakaşlı; Onur Başçı; Hakan Cici; Berivan Çeçen; Hasan Havitçioğlu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 1.511

2.  Comparison of the double loop knot stitch and Kessler stitch for Achilles tendon repair: A biomechanical cadaver study.

Authors:  Stephan Frosch; Gottfried Buchhorn; Thelonius Hawellek; Tim Alexander Walde; Wolfgang Lehmann; Jan Hubert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.