Literature DB >> 24752832

Macular pigment optical density measurements by one-wavelength reflection photometry--influence of cataract surgery on the measurement results.

Bogdana Komar1, Franziska Georgia Rauscher, Renate Wiedemann, Jens Dawczynski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The main objective of the present study was the investigation of possible influence of lens opacification on macular pigment optical density (MPOD) measurements.
METHODS: Eighty-six eyes of 64 patients (mean age 73.4 ± 8.3 years) were included in the study. MPOD was prospectively measured using the one-wavelength reflection method (Visucam500, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) before and after cataract extraction, with implantation of a blue-light filtering intraocular lens (AlconSN60WF). The median of the maximum optical density (MaxOD) and the median of the mean optical density (MeanOD) measurements of macular pigment across the subject group were evaluated.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were noticed between pre-operative and post-operative measurements, the absolute values were generally lower after cataract extraction. The following median (lower/upper quartile) differences across the group were determined: MaxOD -33.8 % (-46.2 to -19.1 %), MeanOD -44.0 % (-54.6 to -26.6 %). Larger changes were observed in elderly patients [<70 years of age (n = 25 eyes): MaxOD -13.4 % (-20.5 to 3.6 %), MeanOD -23.6 % (-30.5 to -15.3 %) versus patients ≥70 years (n = 61 eyes) MaxOD -40.5 % (-53.2 to -30.1 %), MeanOD -47.2 % (-57.8 to -40.1 %)] and in patients with progressed stage of cataract. MaxOD for lens opacification grade 1 (n = 9 eyes): -27.4 % (-42.1 to -19.6 %), grade 2 (n = 26 eyes): -35.0 % (-44.2 to -25.3 %), grade 3 (n = 21 eyes): -34.4 % (-45.4 to -11.4 %), grade 4 (n = 25 eyes): -32.6 % (-53.2 to -6.4 %), and grade 5 (n = 5 eyes): -53.5 % (-61.7 to -38.7 %) and MeanOD for cataract stage 1 (n = 9 eyes): -42.6 % (-46.0 to -26.0 %), stage 2 (n = 26 eyes): -44.1 % (-51.8 to -26.2 %), stage 3 (n = 21 eyes): -45.7 % (-54.7 to -24.7 %), stage 4 (n = 25 eyes): -39.5 % (-59.4 to -26.1 %), and stage 5 (n = 5 eyes): -57.0 % (-66.1 to -51.4 %).
CONCLUSIONS: As established by comparison of pre- to post-operative measurements, cataract presented a strong effect on MPOD measured by one-wavelength reflection method. Particular care should therefore be taken when evaluating MPOD using this method in elderly patients with progressed stage of cataract. Future optimization of correcting parameters of scattered light and consideration of cataract influence may allow more precise evaluation of MPOD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24752832     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2627-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  73 in total

1.  A portable instrument for measuring macular pigment with central fixation.

Authors:  J Mellerio; S Ahmadi-Lari; F van Kuijk; D Pauleikhoff; A Bird; J Marshall
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.424

2.  Macular pigment and percentage of body fat.

Authors:  John Nolan; Orla O'Donovan; Heather Kavanagh; Jim Stack; Michael Harrison; Annalouise Muldoon; John Mellerio; Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Fast assessment of the central macular pigment density with natural pupil using the macular pigment reflectometer.

Authors:  Jan van de Kraats; Tos T J M Berendschot; Suze Valen; Dirk van Norren
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  The glare hypothesis of macular pigment function.

Authors:  James M Stringham; Billy R Hammond
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Identification and quantitation of carotenoids and their metabolites in the tissues of the human eye.

Authors:  P S Bernstein; F Khachik; L S Carvalho; G J Muir; D Y Zhao; N B Katz
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  Dietary modification of human macular pigment density.

Authors:  B R Hammond; E J Johnson; R M Russell; N I Krinsky; K J Yeum; R B Edwards; D M Snodderly
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The spatial distribution of macular pigment in humans.

Authors:  S F Chen; Y Chang; J C Wu
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.424

Review 8.  Risk factors for age-related maculopathy are associated with a relative lack of macular pigment.

Authors:  John M Nolan; Jim Stack; Orla O' Donovan; Edward Loane; Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.467

9.  Macular carotenoid levels of normal subjects and age-related maculopathy patients in a Japanese population.

Authors:  Akira Obana; Tadahisa Hiramitsu; Yuko Gohto; Akihiro Ohira; Satoshi Mizuno; Toru Hirano; Paul S Bernstein; Hisako Fujii; Ken Iseki; Masaki Tanito; Yoshihiro Hotta
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 10.  The value of measurement of macular carotenoid pigment optical densities and distributions in age-related macular degeneration and other retinal disorders.

Authors:  Paul S Bernstein; François C Delori; Stuart Richer; Frederik J M van Kuijk; Adam J Wenzel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  7 in total

1.  Macular pigment optical density measurements by one-wavelength reflection photometry--influence of cataract surgery on the measurement results.

Authors:  Kyung-Sun Na; Ji-Sun Paik; Yong-Gyu Park
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  What do we know about the macular pigment in AMD: the past, the present, and the future.

Authors:  Ranganathan Arunkumar; Charles M Calvo; Christopher D Conrady; Paul S Bernstein
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Influence of macular oedema on the measurement of macular pigment optical density.

Authors:  Simone Thiele; Franziska Georgia Rauscher; Peter Wiedemann; Jens Dawczynski
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Evaluation of macular pigment optical density following femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Tommaso Verdina; Purva Date; Caterina Benatti; Andrea Lazzerini; Elisa Fornasari; Michele De Maria; Elena Pellacani; Matteo Forlini; Gian Maria Cavallini
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-06

5.  Foveal macular pigment dip in offspring of age-related macular degeneration patients is inversely associated with omega-3 index.

Authors:  Grant A Rutledge; Steven G Pratt; Stuart P Richer; Byki Huntjens; C Blake Perry; Gunilla Pratt; Carla Podella
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Macular Pigment Optical Density in Chinese Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Using the One-Wavelength Reflectometry Method.

Authors:  Yuying Ji; Chengguo Zuo; Mingkai Lin; Xiongze Zhang; Miaoling Li; Lan Mi; Bing Liu; Feng Wen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-10       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Correlations Between Macular, Skin, and Serum Carotenoids.

Authors:  Christopher D Conrady; James P Bell; Brian M Besch; Aruna Gorusupudi; Kelliann Farnsworth; Igor Ermakov; Mohsen Sharifzadeh; Maia Ermakova; Werner Gellermann; Paul S Bernstein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.