| Literature DB >> 27144013 |
Yuying Ji1, Chengguo Zuo1, Mingkai Lin1, Xiongze Zhang1, Miaoling Li1, Lan Mi1, Bing Liu1, Feng Wen1.
Abstract
Purpose. To investigate macular pigment optical density (MPOD) and its relationship with retinal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients using the one-wavelength reflectometry method. Methods. A total of 30 eyes from 30 POAG patients (18 males and 12 females, mean age 47.27 ± 16.93) and 52 eyes from 52 controls (27 males and 25 females, mean age 49.54 ± 19.15) were included in this prospective, observational, case-control study. MPOD was measured in a 7-degree area using one-wavelength reflectometry method. Two parameters, max and mean optical density (OD), were used for analyses. Spectral-domain-optical coherence tomography was used to measure retinal thickness, including central retinal thickness (CRT), the macular ganglion cell complex (GCC), and the circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL). Results. Both maxOD and meanOD were significantly reduced in POAG patients compared with normal subjects (P < 0.001). GCC, CRT, and RNFL thicknesses were also significantly reduced in POAG patients (P < 0.001). GCC thickness had a positive relationship with MPOD. Conclusions. MPOD within the 7-degree area was significantly lower in Chinese POAG patients than in control subjects, and GCC thickness was significantly and positively associated with MPOD. Whether the observed lower MPOD in POAG contributes to the disease process or is secondary to pathological changes caused by the disease (such as loss of ganglion cells) warrants further and longitudinal study.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27144013 PMCID: PMC4842072 DOI: 10.1155/2016/2792103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.909
Characteristics of the study eyes.
| POAG ( | Control ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age ± SD (y) (range) | 47.27 ± 16.93 (20–76) | 49.54 ± 19.15 (10–77) | 0.413 |
| Sex, | 18/12 | 27/25 | 0.500 |
| Smoking, | 7/23 | 5/47 | 0.112 |
| BMI ± SD (range) | 22.24 ± 2.46 (19.10–28.32) | 21.24 ± 2.97 (15.31–28.60) | 0.086 |
| C/D ± SD | 0.83 ± 0.15 | 0.32 ± 0.12 | <0.001 |
BMI: body mass index.
C/D: cup to disc ratio.
Comparison of macular pigment optical density values in two groups.
| POAG | Control |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| MaxOD (d.u.) | 0.301 | 0.076 | 0.370 | 0.056 | <0.001 |
| MeanOD (d.u.) | 0.116 | 0.033 | 0.137 | 0.026 | <0.001 |
d.u.: (density units) the unit for maxOD and meanOD.
Retinal thickness values and comparison of study subjects.
| POAG | Control |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean, | SD, | Mean, | SD, | ||
| GCC | |||||
| 6 mm | 80.80 | 17.33 | 113.10 | 7.71 | <0.001 |
| Superior | 82.92 | 18.47 | 116.95 | 9.00 | <0.001 |
| Inferior | 80.89 | 19.10 | 116.40 | 8.16 | <0.001 |
| Nasal | 86.01 | 21.66 | 119.71 | 9.43 | <0.001 |
| Temporal | 77.65 | 13.12 | 96.91 | 7.22 | <0.001 |
| CRT | |||||
| 6 mm | 290.86 | 26.74 | 328.05 | 17.42 | 0.021 |
| Superior | 293.98 | 29.47 | 333.12 | 18.03 | <0.001 |
| Inferior | 285.61 | 28.80 | 327.45 | 19.86 | <0.001 |
| Nasal | 299.05 | 30.58 | 338.07 | 19.81 | 0.001 |
| Temporal | 288.80 | 26.54 | 320.88 | 16.76 | <0.001 |
| OR | |||||
| 6 mm | 210.06 | 15.40 | 214.95 | 12.64 | 0.271 |
| Superior | 211.06 | 17.74 | 216.18 | 12.81 | 0.135 |
| Inferior | 204.72 | 14.83 | 211.05 | 14.69 | 0.065 |
| Nasal | 213.04 | 16.78 | 218.35 | 15.74 | 0.155 |
| Temporal | 211.15 | 19.66 | 223.97 | 13.90 | 0.308 |
| RNFL | |||||
| Total | 70.20 | 10.84 | 97.93 | 8.33 | <0.001 |
| Superior | 78.25 | 15.74 | 113.71 | 16.95 | <0.001 |
| Inferior | 78.01 | 21.06 | 128.71 | 16.59 | <0.001 |
| Nasal | 58.00 | 8.47 | 68.38 | 6.57 | <0.001 |
| Temporal | 66.53 | 11.23 | 81.42 | 10.60 | <0.001 |
GCC: ganglion cell complex.
CRT: central retinal thickness.
OR: outer retinal thickness (CRT minus GCC).
RNFL: retinal nerve fiber layer.
Pearson correlations between MPOD and retinal thickness in the POAG and control groups.
| POAG | Control | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaxOD | MeanOD | MaxOD | MeanOD | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| GCC | ||||||||
| 6 mm | 0.423 |
| 0.266 | 0.155 | −0.150 | 0.289 | −0.141 | 0.318 |
| Superior | 0.334 | 0.071 | 0.174 | 0.357 | −0.098 | 0.490 | −0.101 | 0.476 |
| Inferior | 0.509 |
| 0.355 | 0.054 | −0.225 | 0.109 | −0.189 | 0.181 |
| Nasal | 0.342 | 0.065 | 0.207 | 0.272 | −0.153 | 0.278 | −0.131 | 0.356 |
| Temporal | 0.521 |
| 0.373 | 0.037 | 0.038 | 0.789 | 0.038 | 0.790 |
| OR | ||||||||
| 6 mm | 0.359 | 0.051 | 0.113 | 0.551 | −0.081 | 0.570 | −0.138 | 0.330 |
| Superior | 0.212 | 0.261 | 0.144 | 0.449 | −0.159 | 0.261 | −0.201 | 0.152 |
| Inferior | 0.451 |
| 0.387 |
| 0.007 | 0.961 | −0.057 | 0.688 |
| Nasal | 0.321 | 0.083 | 0.281 | 0.133 | −0.023 | 0.869 | −0.092 | 0.516 |
| Temporal | 0.333 | 0.073 | 0.249 | 0.185 | −0.216 | 0.124 | −0.252 | 0.071 |
| RNFL | ||||||||
| Total | 0.236 | 0.210 | 0.113 | 0.551 | 0.020 | 0.891 | 0.002 | 0.987 |
| Superior | 0.027 | 0.886 | −0.046 | 0.809 | 0.022 | 0.875 | −0.020 | 0.890 |
| Inferior | 0.212 | 0.262 | 0.112 | 0.557 | 0.107 | 0.449 | 0.090 | 0.525 |
| Nasal | 0.181 | 0.338 | 0.088 | 0.642 | −0.196 | 0.164 | −0.134 | 0.344 |
| Temporal | 0.338 | 0.068 | 0.226 | 0.230 | 0.107 | 0.450 | 0.071 | 0.617 |
GCC: ganglion cell complex.
OR: outer retinal thickness (values of CRT subtracting GCC).
RNFL: retinal nerve fiber layer.
Multiple linear regression model showing the relationship between age, sex, BMI, retinal thickness, maxOD, and meanOD.
| Variables | MaxOD | MeanOD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age | 0.408 |
| 0.591 |
|
| Sex | 0.167 | 0.089 | 0.172 | 0.066 |
| BMI | −0.188 | 0.042 | −0.193 | 0.028 |
| smoking | 0.030 | 0.763 | 0.047 | 0.622 |
| GCC | 0.454 |
| 0.316 |
|
| OR | 0.029 | 0.763 | 0.010 | 0.909 |
BMI: body mass index.
GCC: ganglion cell complex.
OR: outer retinal thickness (CRT minus GCC).
Figure 1Scatter plot depicting the correlation between GCC thickness and MPOD. (a) Positive relation between maxOD and GCC. (b) Positive relation between meanOD and GCC.
Figure 2Patient examples of MPOD and GCC. (a) Fundus photography of case 1 with a cup to disc ratio of approximately 0.6. (b) Fundus photography of case 2 with a cup to disc ratio of approximately 0.9. (c and d) MPOD profile indicating that case 1 (c) exhibits a higher MPOD than case 2 (d) (red arrow). (e and f) GCC profile indicating that case 1 (e) exhibits a thicker GCC than case 2 (f) (deeper blue means thicker thickness).