Literature DB >> 24751607

Short-term follow-up of pertrochanteric fractures treated using the proximal femoral locking plate.

Benjamin Johnson1, Jonathan Stevenson, Ramsey Chamma, Amit Patel, Shin-Jae Rhee, Caroline Lever, Ian Starks, Phillip J Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The proximal femoral locking compression plate is a fixed angled anatomically contoured stainless steel plate used to treat pertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. Recent reports quote a high failure rate associated with this implant. We aimed to identify the common methods of failure and determine the elements of surgical techniques that could be altered to potentially improve outcomes should this implant be used for the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fractures.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart analysis.
SETTING: Three separate centers. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine patients with 29 fractures. INTERVENTION: All patients were treated for pertrochanteric fractures using the proximal femoral locking compression plate. OUTCOME MEASURES: The patient demographics, fracture classification, implant details, and complications.
RESULTS: Twelve of 29 fractures (41.4%) suffered a complication associated with the implant, and 83% of these occurred in elderly women. Complications included bending, backing-out, fracture, or cut-out of the proximal screws and plate fracture. Common technical errors included the following: (1) leaving the plate proud proximally, (2) malposition of the proximal screws within the femoral neck/head, (3) inappropriate use of the hook plate, (4) creating too ridged a construct when used as a bridging plate.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with the use of this implant suggests an unacceptably high failure rate (41.4%). A knowledge of the common pitfalls encountered when using this device is critical in an effort to reduce failure rates. Based on our data, we would urge caution when considering this device for unstable pertrochanteric fractures, especially in the elderly female. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24751607     DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000435629.86640.6f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  9 in total

1.  Management of unstable pertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral locking compression plates and affect of neck-shaft angle on functional outcomes.

Authors:  Emrah Kovalak; Cenk Ermutlu; Tolga Atay; Özgür Başal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-07-15

2.  Comment on "Evaluation of proximal femoral locking plate in unstable extracapsular proximal femoral fractures: Surgical technique & mid term follow up results" [J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma 5 (3) (2014) 137-145].

Authors:  Ankit Chawla; Abhipray Gahlowt
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-07-03

Review 3.  Fatigue failure of the cephalomedullary nail: revision options, outcomes and review of the literature.

Authors:  Adam Tucker; Michael Warnock; Sinead McDonald; Laurence Cusick; Andrew P Foster
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-17

4.  Complications following proximal femoral locking compression plating in unstable proximal femur fractures: medium-term follow-up.

Authors:  Sandro Hodel; Frank J P Beeres; Reto Babst; Björn-Christian Link
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-25

5.  The Influence of Static Load and Sideways Impact Fall on Extramedullary Bone Plates Used to Treat Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture: A Preclinical Strength Assessment.

Authors:  Pratik Nag; Bhaskar Borgohain; Kashif Akhtar Ahmed; Pranjal Phukan; Neeraj Kumar; Alireza Borjali; Kartik Mangudi Varadarajan; Souptick Chanda
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  Shi-Min Chang; Ying-Qi Zhang; Zhuo Ma; Qing Li; Jens Dargel; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 7.  Poor relation between biomechanical and clinical studies for the proximal femoral locking compression plate.

Authors:  Bjarke Viberg; Katrine M V Rasmussen; Søren Overgaard; Cecilia Rogmark
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Proximal Femur Locking Plate for Sub-Trochanteric Femur Fractures: Factors Associated with Failure.

Authors:  Akbar Zubairi; Rizwan Haroon Rashid; Marij Zahid; Pervaiz Mahmood Hashmi; Shahryar Noordin
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-08-29

9.  Controlled study on Gamma nail and proximal femoral locking plate for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures with broken lateral wall.

Authors:  Lei Han; Jing-Jing Liu; Yun-Gen Hu; Ren-Fu Quan; Wei-Li Fang; Bo Jin; Wei-Long Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.