Literature DB >> 23773005

The role of women's attitudinal profiles in satisfaction with the quality of their antenatal and intrapartum care.

Helen M Haines1, Ingegerd Hildingsson, Julie F Pallant, Christine Rubertsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare perceptions of antenatal and intrapartum care in women categorized into three profiles based on attitudes and fear.
DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal cohort study using self-report questionnaires. Profiles were constructed from responses to the Birth Attitudes Profile Scale and the Fear of Birth Scale at pregnancy weeks 18 to 20. Perception of the quality of care was measured using the Quality from Patient's Perspective index at 34 to 36 weeks pregnancy and 2 months after birth.
SETTING: Two hospitals in Sweden and Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred and five (505) pregnant women from one hospital in Västernorrland, Sweden (n = 386) and one in northeast Victoria, Australia (n = 123).
RESULTS: Women were categorized into three profiles: self-determiners, take it as it comes, and fearful. The self-determiners reported the best outcomes, whereas the fearful were most likely to perceive deficient care. Antenatally the fearful were more likely to indicate deficiencies in medical care, emotional care, support received from nurse-midwives or doctors and nurse-midwives'/doctors' understanding of the woman's situation. They also reported deficiencies in two aspects of intrapartum care: support during birth and control during birth.
CONCLUSIONS: Attitudinal profiling of women during pregnancy may assist clinicians to deliver the style and content of antenatal and intrapartum care to match what women value and need. An awareness of a woman's fear of birth provides an opportunity to offer comprehensive emotional support with the aim of promoting a positive birth experience.
© 2013 AWHONN, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fear of Birth Scale; attitudes; beliefs; fear of birth; profiling; quality; satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23773005     DOI: 10.1111/1552-6909.12221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  7 in total

1.  The influence of detailed maternal ethnicity on cesarean delivery: findings from the U.S. birth certificate in the State of Massachusetts.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Summer S Hawkins; Bruce B Cohen
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.689

2.  Expectations and satisfaction with antenatal care among pregnant women with a focus on vulnerable groups: a descriptive study in Ghent.

Authors:  Anna Galle; An-Sofie Van Parys; Kristien Roelens; Ines Keygnaert
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  Is quality of care a key predictor of perinatal health care utilization and patient satisfaction in Malawi?

Authors:  Andreea A Creanga; Sara Gullo; Anne K Sebert Kuhlmann; Thumbiko W Msiska; Christine Galavotti
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Information Needs During Pregnancy and Its Associated Factors in Afghan Pregnant Migrant Women in Iran.

Authors:  Mahnaz Sharifi; Leila Amiri-Farahani; Shima Haghani; Syedeh Batool Hasanpoor-Azghady
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

5.  Gaining insight into how women conceptualize satisfaction: Western Australian women's perception of their maternity care experiences.

Authors:  Lucy Lewis; Yvonne L Hauck; Fiona Ronchi; Caroline Crichton; Liana Waller
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Psychometric testing of the support and control in birth scale.

Authors:  Shu-Yu Liu; Yu-Ying Lu; Meei-Ling Gau; Chieh-Yu Liu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 7.  Patient experience studies in the circumpolar region: a scoping review.

Authors:  Christine Ingemann; Nathaniel Fox Hansen; Nanna Lund Hansen; Kennedy Jensen; Christina Viskum Lytken Larsen; Susan Chatwood
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.