Literature DB >> 24748428

Adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an overview of fifty countries.

Florence Margraff1, Delphine Bertram.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The modalities and contributions to drug safety of patient adverse drug reaction reporting systems in 50 countries have been reviewed and analysed.
METHODS: The means made available by National Health Competent Authorities (NCAs) for patients to report drug side effects were compared through literature review and questionnaire.
RESULTS: Among the 50 countries included in this study, we found that direct patient reporting systems exist in 44 countries and represent 9 % of total reports, the rest coming from healthcare professionals. Australia was the first, in 1964, and the United States has the system in which patients are the most involved. A total of 27 countries have a patient-specific reporting form, and 31 countries provide a form to complete online. In order to help patients, four countries constrain the description of the reaction and 12 constrain the choice of drug on the reporting form. Most of the surveyed countries request the patient's medical history (30 countries) and concomitant therapies (41 countries). The total number of fields per form ranges from 6 to 59, with a mean of 36 items.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the surveyed countries have implemented a patient adverse drug reaction reporting system. From this study, it seems that an online reporting form increases the rate of reporting. Currently, many different forms exist worldwide; these should be harmonized by considering the strengths and weaknesses of all existing forms. But above all, to increase the number of reports, each country should promote NCA-initiated adverse drug reactions reporting systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24748428     DOI: 10.1007/s40264-014-0162-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  18 in total

Review 1.  Experiences with adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an 11-country survey.

Authors:  Florence van Hunsel; Linda Härmark; Shanthi Pal; Sten Olsson; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a review of published literature and international experience.

Authors:  A Blenkinsopp; P Wilkie; M Wang; P A Routledge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Web-scale pharmacovigilance: listening to signals from the crowd.

Authors:  Ryen W White; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Nigam H Shah; Russ B Altman; Eric Horvitz
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Specific features of medicines safety and pharmacovigilance in Africa.

Authors:  Ambrose O Isah; Shanthi N Pal; Sten Olsson; Alexander Dodoo; Rachida Soulayami Bencheikh
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2012-02

5.  The proportion of patient reports of suspected ADRs to signal detection in the Netherlands: case-control study.

Authors:  Florence van Hunsel; Attje Talsma; Eugène van Puijenbroek; Lolkje de Jong-van den Berg; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting.

Authors:  Ethan Basch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  How do patients contribute to signal detection? : A retrospective analysis of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in the UK's Yellow Card Scheme.

Authors:  Lorna Hazell; Victoria Cornelius; Philip Hannaford; Saad Shakir; Anthony J Avery
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Adverse drug reaction reporting by patients in the Netherlands: three years of experience.

Authors:  Joyce de Langen; Florence van Hunsel; Anneke Passier; Lolkje de Jong-van den Berg; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Motives for reporting adverse drug reactions by patient-reporters in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Florence van Hunsel; Christine van der Welle; Anneke Passier; Eugène van Puijenbroek; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Comparative evaluation of adverse drug reaction reporting forms for introduction of a spontaneous generic ADR form.

Authors:  Anshi Singh; Parloop Bhatt
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2012-07
View more
  26 in total

1.  Comment on: "Adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an overview of fifty countries".

Authors:  Syed Rizwanuddin Ahmad
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Authors' reply to Ahmad SR: "Adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an overview of fifty countries".

Authors:  Florence Margraff; Delphine Bertram
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems.

Authors:  Linda Härmark; Florence van Hunsel; Birgitta Grundmark
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Consumer reporting of adverse drug reactions: Systems that allow patients to report side effects of the drugs they are taking have yielded valuable information for improving drugs safety and health care.

Authors:  Katrin Weigmann
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Patient Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions: An International Survey of National Competent Authorities' Views and Needs.

Authors:  Cristiano Matos; Linda Härmark; Florence van Hunsel
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Direct reporting of adverse drug reactions by healthcare consumers in Africa: a narrative review.

Authors:  Halimat Adedeji-Adenola; Manimbulu Nlooto
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2020-09-09

7.  Pharmacovigilance in developing countries (part I): importance and challenges.

Authors:  Shaimaa Elshafie; Iman Zaghloul; Anne Marie Roberti
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-08

8.  Patients' Perspectives on Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in a Developing Country: A Case Study from Ghana.

Authors:  George Tsey Sabblah; Delese Mimi Darko; Hudu Mogtari; Linda Härmark; Eugène van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  The value of patient reporting to the pharmacovigilance system: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pedro Inácio; Afonso Cavaco; Marja Airaksinen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Informativeness of patient initial reports of adverse drug reactions. Can it be improved by a pharmacovigilance centre?

Authors:  F Kheloufi; A Default; F Rouby; D Laugier-Castellan; M Boyer; B Rodrigues; J Ponte-Astoul; M J Jean-Pastor; O Blin; J Micallef
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.