Literature DB >> 25627832

ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems.

Linda Härmark1, Florence van Hunsel, Birgitta Grundmark.   

Abstract

Consumer reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has existed in several countries for decades, but throughout Europe the role of consumers as a source of information on ADRs has not been fully accepted until recently. In Europe, The Netherlands and Sweden were among the first countries to implement consumer reporting well before it was mandated by law throughout the EU. Consumer reporting is an integral part of the spontaneous reporting systems in both The Netherlands and Sweden, with yearly numbers of reports constantly increasing. Consumer reporting forms and handling procedures are essentially the same as for healthcare professional reporting; the message in the reports, not the type of messenger, is what is of importance. Studies have established the significant contribution of consumer reporting to ADR signal detection. Combining all reports regardless of reporter type is recommended since it yields the largest critical mass of reports for signal detection. Examples of signals where consumer reports have been of crucial importance for signal detection are electric shock-like sensations associated with the use of duloxetine, and persistent sexual dysfunction after discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. An example of consumer reporting significantly strengthening a detected signal is Pandemrix(®) (influenza H1N1 vaccine)-induced narcolepsy. Raising public awareness of ADR reporting is important, but time- and resource-consuming. The minimum effort taken should be to passively inform consumers, e.g. via stakeholders' homepages and via drug product information leaflets. Another possibility of reaching out to this target group could be through co-operation with other (non-government) organizations. Information from consumer reports may give a new perspective on ADRs via the consumers' unfiltered experiences. Consumers' views may change the way the benefit-harm balance of drugs is perceived and assessed today, and, being the ultimate users of drugs, consumers could have a relevant influence in the regulatory decision-making processes for drugs. All stakeholders in pharmacovigilance should embrace this new valuable source of information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25627832     DOI: 10.1007/s40264-015-0264-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  43 in total

1.  [Thrombosis and embolism during Diane-35 use: analysis of reports made to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb].

Authors:  Florence P A M van Hunsel; Agnes C Kant; Eugène P van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2014

2.  Shock-like sensations after discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

Authors:  L Frost; S Lal
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  The proportion of patient reports of suspected ADRs to signal detection in the Netherlands: case-control study.

Authors:  Florence van Hunsel; Attje Talsma; Eugène van Puijenbroek; Lolkje de Jong-van den Berg; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Medicine safety: experiences and perceptions of the general public in Liverpool.

Authors:  Janet Krska; Laura Jones; Jonathan McKinney; Craig Wilson
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  [Direct reporting of side effects by the patient: favourable experience in the first year].

Authors:  A C van Grootheest; J L M Passier; E P van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2005-03-05

Review 6.  Sexual dysfunction, depression, and the impact of antidepressants.

Authors:  Sidney H Kennedy; Sakina Rizvi
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.153

7.  Adverse drug reaction reporting by patients in the Netherlands: three years of experience.

Authors:  Joyce de Langen; Florence van Hunsel; Anneke Passier; Lolkje de Jong-van den Berg; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Adverse drug reaction reports of patients and healthcare professionals-differences in reported information.

Authors:  Leàn Rolfes; Florence van Hunsel; Sarah Wilkes; Kees van Grootheest; Eugène van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  [Does sexual dysfunction persist upon discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors?].

Authors:  G C Ekhart; E P van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Tijdschr Psychiatr       Date:  2014

Review 10.  Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions : a systematic review.

Authors:  Lorna Hazell; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.228

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  [Adverse ocular effects of vaccinations].

Authors:  T Ness; H Hengel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Consumer reporting of adverse drug reactions: Systems that allow patients to report side effects of the drugs they are taking have yielded valuable information for improving drugs safety and health care.

Authors:  Katrin Weigmann
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Patient Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions: An International Survey of National Competent Authorities' Views and Needs.

Authors:  Cristiano Matos; Linda Härmark; Florence van Hunsel
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Direct reporting of adverse drug reactions by healthcare consumers in Africa: a narrative review.

Authors:  Halimat Adedeji-Adenola; Manimbulu Nlooto
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2020-09-09

5.  Comment on "Patient Reporting in the EU: Analysis of EudraVigilance Data".

Authors:  Farid Kheloufi; Anne Default; Frank Rouby; Olivier Blin; Joelle Micallef
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Serious adverse events reported for antiobesity medicines: postmarketing experiences from the EU adverse event reporting system EudraVigilance.

Authors:  L Aagaard; C E Hallgreen; E H Hansen
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  Opportunities for changes in the drug product design to enhance medication safety in older people: Evaluation of a national public portal for medication incidents.

Authors:  Fatma Karapinar-Çarkit; Patricia M L A van den Bemt; Mariam Sadik; Brigit van Soest; Wilma Knol; Florence van Hunsel; Diana A van Riet-Nales
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  The value of patient reporting to the pharmacovigilance system: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pedro Inácio; Afonso Cavaco; Marja Airaksinen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  The Role of European Patient Organizations in Pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Cristiano Matos; Gerda Weits; Florence van Hunsel
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Patient-Reported Safety Information: A Renaissance of Pharmacovigilance?

Authors:  Linda Härmark; June Raine; Hubert Leufkens; I Ralph Edwards; Ugo Moretti; Viola Macolic Sarinic; Agnes Kant
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.