Literature DB >> 24748227

Evaluation of endoscopic transpapillary brushing cytology for the diagnosis of bile duct cancer based on the histopathologic findings.

Yu Sasaki1, Yoshinobu Okabe, Yusuke Ishida, Tomoki Taira, Makiko Yasumoto, Kei Kuraoka, Yoshiki Naito, Masamichi Nakayama, Osamu Tsuruta, Michio Sata.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Diagnosis of the bile duct cancer still needs more accuracy. Studies on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided brushing cytology were carried to evaluate the role of the endoscopic transpapillary brushing cytology for the diagnosis of bile duct cancer. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: The study involved 76 consecutive patients who underwent ERCP-guided bile duct cytology for the diagnosis of bile duct cancer from 2008 to August 2012. Three types of cytological specimens were obtained using different sampling methods, i.e., bile aspiration cytology (BAC), brush tip cytology (BTC), and post brushing bile cytology (PBC), to investigate their diagnostic abilities, and comparatively studied with each macroscopic type of the surgically resected specimens.
RESULTS: The cancer-positive rate was 67.1 % (BAC alone: 41.9 %), and the use of BTC and PBC in addition to BAC yielded a statistically significant increase of the cancer-positive rate (p = 0.0031). In 34 resected cases, the cancer-positive rate in relation to the macroscopic type was improved by the addition of BTC and PBC to BAC alone for the papillary (87.5 vs. 40.0 %, p = 0.071) and nodular (100 vs. 70.0 %, p = 0.0603) types, but not for the flat type (62.5 vs. 57.1 %; p = 0.7651).
CONCLUSION: The diagnostic ability of ERCP-guided brushing cytology could be improved by the addition of PBC. However, the cancer-positive rate was the lowest for the flat type of bile duct cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24748227     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3124-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  23 in total

1.  The combination of stricture dilation, endoscopic needle aspiration, and biliary brushings significantly improves diagnostic yield from malignant bile duct strictures.

Authors:  R J Farrell; A K Jain; S L Brandwein; H Wang; R Chuttani; D K Pleskow
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 2).

Authors:  Mario de Bellis; Stuart Sherman; Evan L Fogel; Harvey Cramer; John Chappo; Lee McHenry; James L Watkins; Glen A Lehman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  How many cytological examinations should be performed for the diagnosis of malignant biliary stricture via an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube?

Authors:  Naohito Uchida; Hideki Kamada; Masahiro Ono; Yuichi Aritomo; Tsutomu Masaki; Toshiaki Nakatsu; Shigeki Kuriyama
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 4.029

4.  Endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy without sphincterotomy for diagnosing biliary strictures: a prospective comparative study with bile and brush cytology.

Authors:  M Sugiyama; Y Atomi; N Wada; A Kuroda; T Muto
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  EUS-FNA for suspected malignant biliary strictures after negative endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ohshima; Ichiro Yasuda; Hiroshi Kawakami; Masaki Kuwatani; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Takuji Iwashita; Shinpei Doi; Masanori Nakashima; Yoshinobu Hirose; Masahiro Asaka; Hisataka Moriwaki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stenoses.

Authors:  R Schoefl; M Haefner; F Wrba; F Pfeffel; C Stain; R Poetzi; A Gangl
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study.

Authors:  V Pugliese; M Conio; G Nicolò; S Saccomanno; B Gatteschi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Biliary tract cytology in specimens obtained by direct cholangiographic procedures: a study of 74 cases.

Authors:  M N de Peralta-Venturina; D K Wong; M J Purslow; S R Kini
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.582

9.  Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology (ERBC) of the biliary and pancreatic ducts.

Authors:  M Osnes; A Serck-Hanssen; J Myren
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  A prospective, controlled analysis of endoscopic cytotechniques for diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.

Authors:  P G Foutch; D M Kerr; J R Harlan; T D Kummet
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic Ability of Endoscopic Bile Cytology Using a Newly Designed Biliary Scraper for Biliary Strictures.

Authors:  Kazunari Nakahara; Yosuke Michikawa; Ryo Morita; Keigo Suetani; Nozomi Morita; Junya Sato; Kensuke Tsuji; Hiroki Ikeda; Kotaro Matsunaga; Tsunamasa Watanabe; Nobuyuki Matsumoto; Shinjiro Kobayashi; Takehito Otsubo; Fumio Itoh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  High Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Brush Cytology for Indeterminate Strictures.

Authors:  Abdulsemed M Nur; Misbah Salim; Scott Boerner; Suqing Li; Cindy C Y Law; Leanne Edwards; Kaitlin Ryan; Paul D James
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-05

3.  Outcomes of Different Methods for Analysis of Biliary Brush Cytology and of Factors Associated with Positive Diagnosis in an Age-Dependent Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Mariana Costa; Jorge Canena; Luís Mascarenhas-Lemos; Rafaela Loureiro; Mário Silva; Diana Carvalho; Tiago Capela; Pedro Russo; Gonçalo Ramos; António Mateus-Dias; Mário Ferraz-Oliveira; Pedro Mota Veiga; João Coimbra
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.