Literature DB >> 21526370

EUS-FNA for suspected malignant biliary strictures after negative endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy.

Yasuhiro Ohshima1, Ichiro Yasuda, Hiroshi Kawakami, Masaki Kuwatani, Tsuyoshi Mukai, Takuji Iwashita, Shinpei Doi, Masanori Nakashima, Yoshinobu Hirose, Masahiro Asaka, Hisataka Moriwaki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy are widely used for the pathological diagnosis of suspected malignant biliary strictures (MBS). However, the sensitivity of these methods remains insufficient, and it can be difficult to confirm the diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and the impact of this technique on clinical management in patients with suspected MBS where endoscopic brush cytology and biopsy yielded negative results.
METHODS: This study included 225 consecutive patients with suspected MBS, who underwent endoscopic brush cytology and biopsy at our institutions. Negative results were obtained for these pathological tests in 75 patients, and EUS-FNA was performed in 22 of these patients. We retrospectively compared the EUS-FNA results with the final diagnosis and examined the influence of the EUS-FNA diagnosis on treatment selection.
RESULTS: FNA specimens were successfully obtained in all patients, and the pathological results confirmed malignancy in 16 cases and predicted that the other 6 cases were benign. Of the 6 cases that were suspected to be benign, 3 patients were diagnosed with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis by surgical pathology, and the remaining 3 patients were diagnosed with benign diseases at a follow-up after 12-18 months. Thus, the EUS-FNA-based diagnosis was proven correct for all the patients. In addition, the treatment strategy was altered as a result of the EUS-FNA results in the above 6 patients (27%).
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA is a sensitive and safe diagnostic modality for patients with suspected MBS and can be an additional option in cases where endoscopic brush cytology and biopsy have produced negative results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21526370     DOI: 10.1007/s00535-011-0404-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0944-1174            Impact factor:   7.527


  33 in total

1.  How to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.

Authors:  E L Fogel; S Sherman
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Melanoma seeding of an EUS-guided fine needle track.

Authors:  Janak N Shah; Douglas Fraker; DuPont Guerry; Michael Feldman; Michael L Kochman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  A first report of tumor seeding because of EUS-guided FNA of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sarto C Paquin; Gilles Gariépy; Luigi Lepanto; Raymond Bourdages; Ginette Raymond; Anand V Sahai
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy without sphincterotomy for diagnosing biliary strictures: a prospective comparative study with bile and brush cytology.

Authors:  M Sugiyama; Y Atomi; N Wada; A Kuroda; T Muto
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Endoscopic scraping biopsy of malignant biliary strictures.

Authors:  J W Leung; J Y Sung; S C Chung; K M Chan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  J Jailwala; E L Fogel; S Sherman; K Gottlieb; J Flueckiger; L G Bucksot; G A Lehman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Diagnosis of cancer by cytologic methods performed during ERCP.

Authors:  P G Foutch
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study.

Authors:  V Pugliese; M Conio; G Nicolò; S Saccomanno; B Gatteschi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for splenic tumor: a case series.

Authors:  T Iwashita; I Yasuda; H Tsurumi; N Goto; M Nakashima; S Doi; Y Hirose; T Takami; H Moriwaki
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 10.  Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Review.

Authors:  E H Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  21 in total

1.  What is the current role of endoscopy in primary sclerosing cholangitis?

Authors:  Benjamin Tharian; Nayana Elizabeth George; Tony Chiew Keong Tham
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-08-10

2.  EUS-guided FNA for biliary disease as first-line modality to obtain histological evidence.

Authors:  Saori Onda; Takeshi Ogura; Yoshitaka Kurisu; Daisuke Masuda; Tatsushi Sano; Wataru Takagi; Shinya Fukunishi; Kazuhide Higuchi
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.409

3.  Can endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration offer clinical benefit for thick-walled gallbladders?

Authors:  Takeshi Ogura; Yoshitaka Kurisu; Daisuke Masuda; Akira Imoto; Saori Onda; Rieko Kamiyama; Michihiro Hayashi; Malak Mohamed; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Kazuhide Higuchi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  A case of follicular cholangitis mimicking hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Masakuni Fujii; Junji Shiode; Takefumi Niguma; Mamoru Ito; Shuhei Ishiyama; Akiko Fujiwara; Soichiro Nose; Masao Yoshioka; Tetsushige Mimura
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-03

5.  Evaluation of endoscopic transpapillary brushing cytology for the diagnosis of bile duct cancer based on the histopathologic findings.

Authors:  Yu Sasaki; Yoshinobu Okabe; Yusuke Ishida; Tomoki Taira; Makiko Yasumoto; Kei Kuraoka; Yoshiki Naito; Masamichi Nakayama; Osamu Tsuruta; Michio Sata
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Endoscopic ultrasonography guided-fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of solid pancreaticobiliary lesions: Clinical aspects to improve the diagnosis.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Matsubayashi; Toru Matsui; Yohei Yabuuchi; Kenichiro Imai; Masaki Tanaka; Naomi Kakushima; Keiko Sasaki; Hiroyuki Ono
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Brush Cytology, Forceps Biopsy, or Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling for Diagnosis of Bile Duct Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seung Bae Yoon; Sung-Hoon Moon; Sung Woo Ko; Hyun Lim; Ho Suk Kang; Jong Hyeok Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 8.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasound for tissue diagnosis of malignant biliary stricture: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux De Moura; Wanderlei Marques Bernardo; Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura; Felipe I Baraca; André Kondo; Sérgio Eijii Matuguma; Everson Luis Almeida Artifon
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 9.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Anna Strongin; Harkirat Singh; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Ali A Siddiqui
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.628

10.  Safety and utility of single-session endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of pancreatobiliary diseases.

Authors:  Kazumichi Kawakubo; Hiroshi Kawakami; Masaki Kuwatani; Shin Haba; Taiki Kudo; Yoko Abe; Shuhei Kawahata; Manabu Onodera; Nobuyuki Ehira; Hiroaki Yamato; Kazunori Eto; Naoya Sakamoto
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.