Literature DB >> 24748161

Hospital and geographic variability in two colorectal cancer surgery outcomes: complications and mortality after complications.

M Schootman1, M Lian, S L Pruitt, S Hendren, M Mutch, A D Deshpande, D B Jeffe, N O Davidson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe hospital and geographic variation in 30-day risk of surgical complications and death among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and the extent to which patient-, hospital-, and census-tract-level characteristics increased risk of these outcomes.
METHODS: We included patients at least 66 years old with first primary stage I-III CRC from the 2000-2005 National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data linked with 1999-2005 Medicare claims. A multilevel, cross-classified logistic model was used to account for nesting of patients within hospitals and within residential census tracts. Outcomes were risk of complications and death after a complication within 30 days of surgery.
RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 35,946 patients undergoing surgery at 1,222 hospitals and residing in 12,187 census tracts; 27.2 % of patients developed complications, and of these 13.4 % died. Risk-adjusted variability in complications across hospitals and census tracts was similar. Variability in mortality was larger than variability in complications, across hospitals and across census tracts. Specific characteristics increased risk of complications (e.g., census-tract-poverty rate, emergency surgery, and being African-American). No hospital characteristics increased complication risk. Specific characteristics increased risk of death (e.g. census-tract-poverty rate, being diagnosed with colon (versus rectal) cancer, and emergency surgery), while hospitals with at least 500 beds showed reduced death risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Large, unexplained variations exist in mortality after surgical complications in CRC across hospitals and geographic areas. The potential exists for quality improvement efforts targeted at the hospital and/or census-tract levels to prevent complications and augment hospitals' ability to reduce mortality risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24748161      PMCID: PMC4090776          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3472-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  39 in total

1.  Can administrative data be used to ascertain clinically significant postoperative complications?

Authors:  Patrick S Romano; Michael E Schembri; Julie A Rainwater
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Value of failure to rescue as a marker of the standard of care following reoperation for complications after colorectal resection.

Authors:  A M Almoudaris; E M Burns; R Mamidanna; A Bottle; P Aylin; C Vincent; O Faiz
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Thirty-day postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in England.

Authors:  Eva J A Morris; Elizabeth F Taylor; James D Thomas; Philip Quirke; Paul J Finan; Michel P Coleman; Bernard Rachet; David Forman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Assessment of operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model.

Authors:  Victor W Fazio; Paris P Tekkis; Feza Remzi; Ian C Lavery
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Postoperative 30-day mortality following surgical resection for colorectal cancer in veterans: changes in the right direction.

Authors:  Jessica A Davila; Linda Rabeneck; David H Berger; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Hospital and patient characteristics associated with death after surgery. A study of adverse occurrence and failure to rescue.

Authors:  J H Silber; S V Williams; H Krakauer; J S Schwartz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Potential role of comanagement in "rescue" of surgical patients.

Authors:  Keiki Hinami; Joe Feinglass; Darlene E Ferranti; Mark V Williams
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  W E Longo; K S Virgo; F E Johnson; C A Oprian; A M Vernava; T P Wade; M A Phelan; W G Henderson; J Daley; S F Khuri
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 9.  Common complications in the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Kathleen B To; Lena M Napolitano
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Importance of the first postoperative year in the prognosis of elderly colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  J W T Dekker; C B M van den Broek; E Bastiaannet; L G M van de Geest; R A E M Tollenaar; G J Liefers
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  11 in total

1.  Multilevel analysis in rural cancer control: A conceptual framework and methodological implications.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Sara L McLafferty; Jan M Eberth
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Improved perioperative care is associated with improved long-term survival in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eligijus Poskus; Marius Kryzauskas; Tomas Poskus; Saulius Mikalauskas; Narimantas Evaldas Samalavicius; Oleg Aliosin; Sarunas Dailidenas; Algimantas Tamelis; Zilvinas Saladzinskas; Paulius Lizdenis; Audrone Jakaitiene; Giedre Smailyte; Kestutis Strupas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Nationwide variation in outcomes and cost of laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Ciara R Huntington; Tiffany C Cox; Laurel J Blair; Tanushree Prasad; Amy E Lincourt; B Todd Heniford; Vedra A Augenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Patient, Hospital, and Geographic Disparities in Laparoscopic Surgery Use Among Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Patients With Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Kendra L Ratnapradipa; Min Lian; Donna B Jeffe; Nicholas O Davidson; Jan M Eberth; Sandi L Pruitt; Mario Schootman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Patient, hospital, and geographic disparities associated with comanagement during hospitalization for colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Simone de Vries; Donna B Jeffe; Sandi L Pruitt; Nicholas O Davidson; Mario Schootman
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.960

6.  Outcomes of support rod usage in loop stoma formation.

Authors:  Ian Whiteley; Michael Russell; Natasha Nassar; Marc A Gladman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Outcome of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Danilo Coco; Silvana Leanza
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2019-09

8.  Short-term outcome in patients treated with cytoreduction and HIPEC compared to conventional colon cancer surgery.

Authors:  Geert A Simkens; Vic J Verwaal; Valery E Lemmens; Harm J Rutten; Ignace H de Hingh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  The prediction accuracy of dynamic mixed-effects models in clustered data.

Authors:  Brian S Finkelman; Benjamin French; Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.522

10.  Validity of the CR-POSSUM model in surgery for colorectal cancer in Spain (CCR-CARESS study) and comparison with other models to predict operative mortality.

Authors:  Marisa Baré; Manuel Jesús Alcantara; Maria José Gil; Pablo Collera; Marina Pont; Antonio Escobar; Cristina Sarasqueta; Maximino Redondo; Eduardo Briones; Paula Dujovne; Jose Maria Quintana
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.