Literature DB >> 26139490

Nationwide variation in outcomes and cost of laparoscopic procedures.

Ciara R Huntington1, Tiffany C Cox2, Laurel J Blair2, Tanushree Prasad2, Amy E Lincourt2, B Todd Heniford2, Vedra A Augenstein3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare systems and surgeons are under increasing pressure to provide high-quality care for the lowest possible cost . This study utilizes national data to examine the outcomes and costs of common laparoscopic procedures based on hospital type and location.
METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2008 to 2011 for five laparoscopic procedures: colectomy (LC), inguinal hernia repair, ventral hernia repair (LVHR), Nissen fundoplication (NF), and cholecystectomy (LCh). Outcomes, including complication rate and inpatient mortality, were stratified by region and hospital type. Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed using regression-based survey methods; risk-adjusted mean costs for hospital were calculated after adjusting for patient characteristics.
RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the rates of minor complications varied significantly between geographic regions for LCh, LC, NF, and LVHR (p < 0.05). Though LCh and LVHR had statistical variation between regions for rates of major complications (p < 0.05), all regions were equivalent in rates of inpatient mortality for the procedures (p > 0.05). Rural and urban centers had similar rates of complications (p > 0.05), except for higher rates of major complications following IHR and LC in rural centers (p < 0.02) and following Nissen fundoplication in urban facilities(p < 0.0003). Though urban centers were more expensive for all procedures (p < 0.0001), mortality was similar between groups (p > 0.05). For hospital ownership, private investor-owned facilities were substantially more expensive (p < 0.0001), but had no significant differences in complications compared to other hospital types (p > 0.05). In multivariate analysis, while patient factors helped explain differences between outcome differences in different hospital types and locations, in general, the difference in cost remained statistically significant between hospitals.
CONCLUSION: Though patient demographics and characteristics accounted for some differences in postoperative outcomes after common laparoscopic procedures, higher cost of care was not associated with better outcomes or more complex patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; Hospitals; Laparoscopy; National Inpatient Sample (NIS); Outcomes; Regional variation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26139490     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4328-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  43 in total

1.  Medicare costs and surgeon supply in hospital service areas.

Authors:  Thomas C Ricketts; Daniel W Belsky
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The employed surgeon: a changing professional paradigm.

Authors:  Anthony G Charles; Shiara Ortiz-Pujols; Thomas Ricketts; Erin Fraher; Simon Neuwahl; Bruce Cairns; George F Sheldon
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Continuity of care in a rural critical access hospital: surgeons as primary care providers.

Authors:  Alfred Rossi; Daniel Rossi; Mathew Rossi; Phillip Rossi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Survey finds few orthopedic surgeons know the costs of the devices they implant.

Authors:  Kanu Okike; Robert V O'Toole; Andrew N Pollak; Julius A Bishop; Christopher M McAndrew; Samir Mehta; William W Cross; Grant E Garrigues; Mitchel B Harris; Christopher T Lebrun
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Outcomes associated with resident involvement in laparoscopic colorectal surgery suggest a need for earlier and more intensive resident training.

Authors:  Emre Gorgun; Cigdem Benlice; Elizabeth Corrao; Jeff Hammel; Ozgen Isik; Tracy Hull; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Minimally invasive surgery is underutilized for colon cancer.

Authors:  Celia N Robinson; G John Chen; Courtney J Balentine; Shubhada Sansgiry; Christy L Marshall; Daniel A Anaya; Avo Artinyan; Daniel Albo; David H Berger
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery: socioeconomic inequalities in access and in 30 day mortality. A population-based study in Rome, Italy.

Authors:  C Ancona; N Agabiti; F Forastiere; M Arcà; D Fusco; S Ferro; C A Perucci
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The new 'gold standard'?

Authors:  N J Soper; P T Stockmann; D L Dunnegan; S W Ashley
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-08

9.  Rural-Urban Differences in Access to Specialist Providers of Colorectal Cancer Care in the United States: A Physician Workforce Issue.

Authors:  Jonathan K Aboagye; Heather E Kaiser; Awori J Hayanga
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review.

Authors:  Michol A Cooper; Susan Hutfless; Dorry L Segev; Andrew Ibrahim; Heather Lyu; Martin A Makary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-07-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  A simple "passive awareness" intervention to decrease the cost of thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Richard Liu; Anas Wess; Biniam Kidane; Sadeesh Srinathan; Larry Tan; Gordon Buduhan
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-03

2.  Management of a primary ventral incisional hernia: a survey of the International Hernia Collaboration.

Authors:  James G Bittner; Mercedeh Baghai; Brian P Jacob
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-04

3.  Practice Patterns for Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Patients With Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Robert J Huang; Monique T Barakat; Mohit Girotra; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  The impact of surgeon choices on costs associated with uncomplicated minimally invasive colectomy: you are not as important as you think.

Authors:  John Tillou; Deborah Nagle; Vitaliy Poylin; Thomas Cataldo
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2017-09-27

5.  Statistical analysis plan of a randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy (SECURE trial).

Authors:  Sarah Z Wennmacker; Aafke H van Dijk; Joost P H Drenth; Sandra C Donkervoort; Djamila Boerma; Gert P Westert; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven; Marja A Boermeester; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Philip R de Reuver
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 6.  2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis.

Authors:  Michele Pisano; Niccolò Allievi; Kurinchi Gurusamy; Giuseppe Borzellino; Stefania Cimbanassi; Djamila Boerna; Federico Coccolini; Andrea Tufo; Marcello Di Martino; Jeffrey Leung; Massimo Sartelli; Marco Ceresoli; Ronald V Maier; Elia Poiasina; Nicola De Angelis; Stefano Magnone; Paola Fugazzola; Ciro Paolillo; Raul Coimbra; Salomone Di Saverio; Belinda De Simone; Dieter G Weber; Boris E Sakakushev; Alessandro Lucianetti; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Gustavo P Fraga; Imitaz Wani; Walter L Biffl; Osvaldo Chiara; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Ernest E Moore; Ari Leppäniemi; Yoram Kluger; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.