BACKGROUND: Balloon valvuloplasty has been considered a mandatory step of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), although it is not without risk. The aim of this work was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of TAVI performed without pre-dilation (direct TAVI) of the stenosed aortic valve. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between June 2012 and June 2013, 55 consecutive TAVI performed without pre-dilation at our institution using the self-expandable CoreValve prosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) were analyzed and compared with 45 pre-dilated TAVI performed the previous year. Inclusion criteria were a symptomatic and severe aortic stenosis. Exclusion criteria were defined as presence of pure aortic regurgitation, degenerated surgical bioprosthesis or bicuspid aortic valve and prior procedure of balloon aortic valvuloplasty performed as a bridge to TAVI. RESULTS: High-burden calcification in the device landing zone, assessed by CT scan, was found in most of the patients. The valve size implanted was similar in both groups. Device success was higher in direct TAVI (85%vs.64%,p=0.014), mostly driven by a significant lower incidence of paravalvular leak (PVL≥2;9%vs.33%,p=0.02). Safety combined end point at 30 days was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Compared to TAVI with pre-dilation, direct TAVI is feasible regardless of the presence of bulky calcified aortic valve and the valve size implanted. Device success was higher in direct TAVI, mostly driven by a lower incidence of paravalvular leak. Safety at 30 days was similar in two groups.
BACKGROUND:Balloon valvuloplasty has been considered a mandatory step of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), although it is not without risk. The aim of this work was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of TAVI performed without pre-dilation (direct TAVI) of the stenosed aortic valve. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between June 2012 and June 2013, 55 consecutive TAVI performed without pre-dilation at our institution using the self-expandable CoreValve prosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) were analyzed and compared with 45 pre-dilated TAVI performed the previous year. Inclusion criteria were a symptomatic and severe aortic stenosis. Exclusion criteria were defined as presence of pure aortic regurgitation, degenerated surgical bioprosthesis or bicuspid aortic valve and prior procedure of balloon aortic valvuloplasty performed as a bridge to TAVI. RESULTS: High-burden calcification in the device landing zone, assessed by CT scan, was found in most of the patients. The valve size implanted was similar in both groups. Device success was higher in direct TAVI (85%vs.64%,p=0.014), mostly driven by a significant lower incidence of paravalvular leak (PVL≥2;9%vs.33%,p=0.02). Safety combined end point at 30 days was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Compared to TAVI with pre-dilation, direct TAVI is feasible regardless of the presence of bulky calcified aortic valve and the valve size implanted. Device success was higher in direct TAVI, mostly driven by a lower incidence of paravalvular leak. Safety at 30 days was similar in two groups.
Authors: Matteo Pagnesi; Luca Baldetti; Paolo Del Sole; Antonio Mangieri; Marco B Ancona; Damiano Regazzoli; Nicola Buzzatti; Francesco Giannini; Antonio Colombo; Azeem Latib Journal: Interv Cardiol Date: 2017-09
Authors: Rodrigo Bagur; Chun Shing Kwok; Luis Nombela-Franco; Peter F Ludman; Mark A de Belder; Sandro Sponga; Mark Gunning; James Nolan; Pantelis Diamantouros; Patrick J Teefy; Bob Kiaii; Michael W A Chu; Mamas A Mamas Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Christian Butter; Peter Bramlage; Tanja Rudolph; Claudius Jacobshagen; Jürgen Rothe; Hendrik Treede; Sebastian Kerber; Derk Frank; Lenka Seilerova; Gerhard Schymik Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Glen P Martin; Matthew Sperrin; Rodrigo Bagur; Mark A de Belder; Iain Buchan; Mark Gunning; Peter F Ludman; Mamas A Mamas Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-02-18 Impact factor: 5.501