Literature DB >> 24746645

DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice and cancer.

Tomas Aparicio1, Richard Baer2, Jean Gautier3.   

Abstract

Since DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) contribute to the genomic instability that drives cancer development, DSB repair pathways serve as important mechanisms for tumor suppression. Thus, genetic lesions, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, that disrupt DSB repair are often associated with cancer susceptibility. In addition, recent evidence suggests that DSB "mis-repair", in which DSBs are resolved by an inappropriate repair pathway, can also promote genomic instability and presumably tumorigenesis. This notion has gained currency from recent cancer genome sequencing studies which have uncovered numerous chromosomal rearrangements harboring pathological DNA repair signatures. In this perspective, we discuss the factors that regulate DSB repair pathway choice and their consequences for genome stability and cancer.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  53BP1–BRCA1; DNA double strand break; DNA ends; Microhomology-mediated end joining; Repair pathway choice; Resection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24746645      PMCID: PMC4051845          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  96 in total

1.  Molecular cloning of the human gene, PNKP, encoding a polynucleotide kinase 3'-phosphatase and evidence for its role in repair of DNA strand breaks caused by oxidative damage.

Authors:  A Jilani; D Ramotar; C Slack; C Ong; X M Yang; S W Scherer; D D Lasko
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-08-20       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination.

Authors:  Marie Frank-Vaillant; Stéphane Marcand
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  Genetic manipulation of genomes with rare-cutting endonucleases.

Authors:  M Jasin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Fyodor D Urnov; Jeffrey C Miller; Ya-Li Lee; Christian M Beausejour; Jeremy M Rock; Sheldon Augustus; Andrew C Jamieson; Matthew H Porteus; Philip D Gregory; Michael C Holmes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Alternative end-joining catalyzes robust IgH locus deletions and translocations in the combined absence of ligase 4 and Ku70.

Authors:  Cristian Boboila; Mila Jankovic; Catherine T Yan; Jing H Wang; Duane R Wesemann; Tingting Zhang; Alex Fazeli; Lauren Feldman; Andre Nussenzweig; Michel Nussenzweig; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Fanconi anemia proteins stabilize replication forks.

Authors:  Lily Chien Wang; Stacie Stone; Maureen Elizabeth Hoatlin; Jean Gautier
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-09-25

7.  Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.

Authors:  Nicole Bennardo; Amanda Gunn; Anita Cheng; Paul Hasty; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1.

Authors:  Grzegorz Ira; Achille Pellicioli; Alitukiriza Balijja; Xuan Wang; Simona Fiorani; Walter Carotenuto; Giordano Liberi; Debra Bressan; Lihong Wan; Nancy M Hollingsworth; James E Haber; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The interaction between CtIP and BRCA1 is not essential for resection-mediated DNA repair or tumor suppression.

Authors:  Colleen R Reczek; Matthias Szabolcs; Jeremy M Stark; Thomas Ludwig; Richard Baer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Metabolomic profiling unravels DNA adducts in human breast that are formed from peroxidase mediated activation of estrogens to quinone methides.

Authors:  Nilesh W Gaikwad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  136 in total

Review 1.  Patching Broken DNA: Nucleosome Dynamics and the Repair of DNA Breaks.

Authors:  Ozge Gursoy-Yuzugullu; Nealia House; Brendan D Price
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint defects in a mouse model of 'BRCAness' are partially rescued by 53BP1 deletion.

Authors:  Sarah M Misenko; Dharm S Patel; Joonyoung Her; Samuel F Bunting
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Mechanism of action studies of lomaiviticin A and the monomeric lomaiviticin aglycon. Selective and potent activity toward DNA double-strand break repair-deficient cell lines.

Authors:  Laureen C Colis; Denise C Hegan; Miho Kaneko; Peter M Glazer; Seth B Herzon
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  The Mechanism of Action of (-)-Lomaiviticin A.

Authors:  Seth B Herzon
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 22.384

5.  Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Is Associated with Oxidative Stress-induced Genome Instability.

Authors:  Bennett Van Houten
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Competing interaction partners modulate the activity of Sgs1 helicase during DNA end resection.

Authors:  Kristina Kasaciunaite; Fergus Fettes; Maryna Levikova; Peter Daldrop; Roopesh Anand; Petr Cejka; Ralf Seidel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  Ways of improving precise knock-in by genome-editing technologies.

Authors:  Svetlana A Smirnikhina; Arina A Anuchina; Alexander V Lavrov
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase-Mediated Genotoxicity of 2-Methoxyestradiol in Hippocampal HT22 Cell Line.

Authors:  Magdalena Gorska; Michal A Zmijewski; Alicja Kuban-Jankowska; Maciej Wnuk; Iwona Rzeszutek; Michal Wozniak
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 5.590

9.  Phage Mu Gam protein promotes NHEJ in concert with Escherichia coli ligase.

Authors:  Sudipta Bhattacharyya; Michael M Soniat; David Walker; Sooin Jang; Ilya J Finkelstein; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Local sequence assembly reveals a high-resolution profile of somatic structural variations in 97 cancer genomes.

Authors:  Jiali Zhuang; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.