John W Ayers1, Benjamin M Althouse2, Morgan Johnson3, Mark Dredze4, Joanna E Cohen5. 1. Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California. Electronic address: ayers.john.w@gmail.com. 2. The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico. 3. The Mondays Campaign, New York, New York. 4. Human Language Technology Center of Excellence, Johns Hopkins University. 5. Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biological clocks govern numerous aspects of human health, including weekly clocks-called circaseptan rhythms-that typically include early-week spikes for many illnesses. PURPOSE: To determine whether contemplations for healthy behaviors also follow circaseptan rhythms. METHODS: We assessed healthy contemplations by monitoring Google search queries (2005-2012) in the U.S. that included the word healthy and were Google classified as health-related (e.g., healthy diet). A wavelet analysis was used in 2013 to isolate the circaseptan rhythm, with the resulting series compared by estimating ratios of relative query volume (healthy versus all queries) each day (e.g., (Monday-Wednesday)/Wednesday). RESULTS: Healthy searches peaked on Monday and Tuesday, thereafter declining until rebounding modestly on Sunday. Monday and Tuesday were statistically indistinguishable (t=1.22, p=0.22), but their combined mean had 30% (99% CI=29, 32) more healthy queries than the combined mean for Wednesday-Sunday. Monday and Tuesday query volume was 3% (99% CI=2, 5) greater than Wednesday, 15% (99% CI=13, 17) greater than Thursday, 49% (99% CI=46, 52) greater than Friday, 80% (99% CI=76, 84) greater than Saturday, and 29% (99% CI=27, 31) greater than Sunday. We explored media-based (priming) motivations for these patterns and they were consistently rejected. CONCLUSIONS: Just as many illnesses have a weekly clock, so do healthy considerations. Discovery of these rhythms opens the door for a new agenda in preventive medicine, including implications for hypothesis development, research strategies to further explore these rhythms, and interventions to exploit daily cycles in healthy considerations.
BACKGROUND: Biological clocks govern numerous aspects of human health, including weekly clocks-called circaseptan rhythms-that typically include early-week spikes for many illnesses. PURPOSE: To determine whether contemplations for healthy behaviors also follow circaseptan rhythms. METHODS: We assessed healthy contemplations by monitoring Google search queries (2005-2012) in the U.S. that included the word healthy and were Google classified as health-related (e.g., healthy diet). A wavelet analysis was used in 2013 to isolate the circaseptan rhythm, with the resulting series compared by estimating ratios of relative query volume (healthy versus all queries) each day (e.g., (Monday-Wednesday)/Wednesday). RESULTS: Healthy searches peaked on Monday and Tuesday, thereafter declining until rebounding modestly on Sunday. Monday and Tuesday were statistically indistinguishable (t=1.22, p=0.22), but their combined mean had 30% (99% CI=29, 32) more healthy queries than the combined mean for Wednesday-Sunday. Monday and Tuesday query volume was 3% (99% CI=2, 5) greater than Wednesday, 15% (99% CI=13, 17) greater than Thursday, 49% (99% CI=46, 52) greater than Friday, 80% (99% CI=76, 84) greater than Saturday, and 29% (99% CI=27, 31) greater than Sunday. We explored media-based (priming) motivations for these patterns and they were consistently rejected. CONCLUSIONS: Just as many illnesses have a weekly clock, so do healthy considerations. Discovery of these rhythms opens the door for a new agenda in preventive medicine, including implications for hypothesis development, research strategies to further explore these rhythms, and interventions to exploit daily cycles in healthy considerations.
Authors: John W Ayers; Benjamin M Althouse; Jon-Patrick Allem; Eric C Leas; Mark Dredze; Rebecca S Williams Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jon-Patrick Allem; Patricia Escobedo; Kar-Hai Chu; Daniel W Soto; Tess Boley Cruz; Jennifer B Unger Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Christine Hill; Brian W Weir; Laura W Fuentes; Alicia Garcia-Alvarez; Danya P Anouti; Lawrence J Cheskin Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: John W Ayers; J Lee Westmaas; Eric C Leas; Adrian Benton; Yunqi Chen; Mark Dredze; Benjamin M Althouse Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Date: 2016-03-31