Hyungchul Park1, Ji Yong Ahn2, Hyungil Seo1, Gyu Young Pih1, Hee Kyong Na3, Jeong Hoon Lee3, Kee Wook Jung3, Do Hoon Kim3, Kee Don Choi3, Ho June Song3, Gin Hyug Lee3, Hwoon-Yong Jung3, Jisuk Lee4, Jinwoo Jeong5, Seon Ok Kim6, Jung Bok Lee6. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. ji110@hanmail.net. 3. Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. 4. Motion Device Inc., Building C, 106, Indukwon IT Valley, 40, Imi-ro, Uiwang-Si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. 5. Robotics Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea. 6. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Valid and reliable methods for measurement of lesion sizes during endoscopy have not been established. METHODS: We developed a novel software program (ENDOVER; Poinbionics, Seoul, Republic of Korea) to measure lesions sizes and assessed its validity and reliability. To validate the program, we measured standard coin sizes and estimated measurement errors. To assess program reliability, 32 pictures of endoscopically resected specimens were used to measure tissue sizes six times in a 24-h interval by two examiners. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess intraobserver and interobserver agreements. Agreement between the program and pathological measurements was assessed by absolute differences. RESULTS: The nominal standard sizes of 10-won, 100-won, and 500-won coins were 18.0, 24.0, and 26.5 mm, and the calculated sizes were 18.09, 24.48, and 26.31 mm, respectively. ICCs of the long and short diameters were, respectively, 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.95] and 0.93 (CI 0.89-0.96) for examiner 1 and 0.88 (CI 0.81-0.93) and 0.92 (CI 0.87-0.95) for examiner 2. Interobserver ICCs of the long and short diameters were 0.97 (CI 0.94-0.99) and 0.97 (CI 0.94-0.99), respectively. The mean absolute differences between the program and pathological measurements were 4.4 and 4.7 mm for the long and short diameters, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the novel measurement program is a valid and reliable method for estimation of lesion sizes from endoscopic findings during and after examination.
BACKGROUND: Valid and reliable methods for measurement of lesion sizes during endoscopy have not been established. METHODS: We developed a novel software program (ENDOVER; Poinbionics, Seoul, Republic of Korea) to measure lesions sizes and assessed its validity and reliability. To validate the program, we measured standard coin sizes and estimated measurement errors. To assess program reliability, 32 pictures of endoscopically resected specimens were used to measure tissue sizes six times in a 24-h interval by two examiners. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess intraobserver and interobserver agreements. Agreement between the program and pathological measurements was assessed by absolute differences. RESULTS: The nominal standard sizes of 10-won, 100-won, and 500-won coins were 18.0, 24.0, and 26.5 mm, and the calculated sizes were 18.09, 24.48, and 26.31 mm, respectively. ICCs of the long and short diameters were, respectively, 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.95] and 0.93 (CI 0.89-0.96) for examiner 1 and 0.88 (CI 0.81-0.93) and 0.92 (CI 0.87-0.95) for examiner 2. Interobserver ICCs of the long and short diameters were 0.97 (CI 0.94-0.99) and 0.97 (CI 0.94-0.99), respectively. The mean absolute differences between the program and pathological measurements were 4.4 and 4.7 mm for the long and short diameters, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the novel measurement program is a valid and reliable method for estimation of lesion sizes from endoscopic findings during and after examination.
Authors: Ji Yong Ahn; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Kee Don Choi; Ji Young Choi; Mi-Young Kim; Jeong Hoon Lee; Kwi-Sook Choi; Do Hoon Kim; Ho June Song; Gin Hyug Lee; Jin-Ho Kim; Young Soo Park Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 9.427